Jump to content


First Team
  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won


Everything posted by Fury

  1. I didn't know until recently how bad it was but it's interesting that it's from the same people.
  2. Actually I didn't. I was aware I'd get plenty from tims, never in a million years did I think I'd get the same (and it often is indistinguishable) from bears.
  3. You at least alluded to where you sit because we've discussed previously why you've never taken the chance to challenge some club employees directly. I think you actually were very specific about being in the Members. Again you assume wrongly where something has come from. You seem to have plenty time to post on here and other forums. If you are so concerned would you not want to do something more constructive? I just don't get it. Anyway it's not a good idea to make allegations at the behest of others or on inaccurate information.
  4. That was always perfectly clear but I'm happy to clarify it for you.
  5. So I shouldn't express my opinion of the abuse on here on Twitter? This is an open forum, anyone including non members can read it. I often get Tims sending me screenshots of things said on here, pishing themselves laughing at the abuse I've taken from a small group of posters. But you think I shouldn't comment on it anywhere? The simple solution is for the personal abuse to stop and then there will be nothing to discuss. I'm happy to argue a point with anyone but I'll comment on people personally abusing me and others wherever I like.
  6. I am not fascinated at all. I'm just asking why you won't step up to lend your experienced voice to the argument you want to put forward? You personally attack other people and claim they are all working together to the detriment of the club but your only response to that is to post those personal attacks on an internet forum. Why not do something more constructive? You've said you are in the Members. Why not go round and get support of other well off Rangers fans for your approach and make a difference? Have you tried?
  7. That's a fair point. I had decided not to post anymore mainly because I thought my absence might stop the constant personal attacks. It's clear that isn't the case though since, if anything, they got worse when I wasn't here. I don't agree with the personal abuse that is allowed on here and the constant shouting down of anyone with an opinion different to a certain group of posters but that is up to admin. If they want to allow it then I'll reserve the right to criticise that approach. I am far from alone in that criticism.
  8. I didn't say all at RM were wankers. However I think I've made my feelings about a group of posters on here pretty clear. Just my opinion of course. Given some of the personal abuse that's allowed on here I'd find it pretty odd if someone on the moderator team was getting precious about that comment.
  9. I'm taking notes here. If I added that vast income to all the money I'm getting from the BBC and the Daily Record, and got Ian Black to stick a bet on for me, then I could retire!
  10. You've made several allegations. You have presented them as fact. If you are so so concerned about the actions of "people like me" and you believe I am working to the detriment of the club then why don't you have the courage of your convictions and put your name to those allegations? You've insinuated many times that you are a successful businessman, that you know what you are talking about and you've made snide digs about other people's credentials to speak about board room matters and the like. Why don't you step out into the light and make your allegations with the weight of your experience
  11. I totally agree. I don't post much on forums but I'm not sure what you mean about me vanishing and coming back?
  12. Tell me. Are you prepared to make any of these allegations in your own name? Not just the ones in this post but all the others you've made on this thread and the board in general? Because if you are then why don't you do it and lend them some credibility? And if not then why? You seem confident you know exactly what is going on.
  13. To be fair I won't be answering PMs from them either, sorry. Just to be clear before they think that's a good idea.
  14. As others have already pointed out, the BBC pay expenses if you are on a panel show either on TV or radio. From memory I've done that 3 times over the past 2 years. All prior to the BBC ban by the club. Since then I have turned them down several times (5+) because the club banned them. They don't pay expenses for news interviews or anything else to my knowledge. STV don't pay anything for panel shows or interviews which, being the place I have appeared most frequently, is disappointing! I'd imagine overall that I'm actually out of pocket given the number of times I've had to drive into town to
  15. I quite agree. This thread is ridiculous and no offence taken.
  16. Bizarrely my mind was focussed elsewhere! My Mrs had a good laugh reading this thread though. I'm just glad she didn't post on it!
  17. So to summarise....I'm leaking info to the Daily Record (and may be getting paid by them to do so), on the BBC payroll, laughing at disability and working for Mark Dingwall? These have all been presented as fact. Have I missed anything? Just as well there is nothing else going on today..... Oh and thanks to those who have been attempting to introduce some sanity to this thread and others I've made the mistake of posting on today. Very much appreciated.
  18. I think I'll give posting a miss again since the usual suspects seem to be up in arms about me being here. Best of the luck to anyone wanting to discuss anything properly on here.
  19. No arguments with me. I've not even been posting until today.
  20. On the contrary. I'm attempting to respond politely to people dishing out personal abuse. Something they do no matter whether I post or not.
  21. How would you know what I speak to admin about? Oh dear. Surely they haven't got a leak? You seem to live your life in a state of perpetual rage at other Rangers fans or employees. Shame.
  22. Your constructive criticism on this thread is noted. Thanks for the input.
  23. They do state that, at least the Trust certainly do. I think your issue might lie with the Assembly since they are meant to be the overarching fan group for the entire support but have been posted almost completely missing over the past two years. I am all for the type of membership scheme discussed briefly at the fan meeting the other night. It's important to have a strong supporter group to represent people not interested in fan ownership or shares. No reason why a membership scheme can't replace the Assembly and provide a strong democratic voice for the support.
  • Create New...