Exactly, he was obviously due this money, not like the club was saying anything to counter this. Least this is my understanding?* Maybe he had a cheek also?
It can't be 'magical', if the courts deem him liable to have the money then he obviously was due it. Whether he was due it for the right reasons isn't properly known to us though.
Plenty of people are 'fraped' when someone posts on anothers FB when they are still signed in, not saying its what happened but saying it is very common. The days of the internet being free are numbered.