Jump to content


Senior Member
  • Posts

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won


TheLawMan last won the day on June 5 2017

TheLawMan had the most liked content!


Profile Information

  • Gender
  • Location

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

TheLawMan's Achievements

Hall of Fame

Hall of Fame (11/12)



  1. Just seen this mate. I actually went one further at the time and said we would run out of money by April 2012.......was 2 months out.
  2. Some reading for anyone interested on Resolution 12 https://www.twitlonger.com/show/n_1sr8gdt
  3. I wish i knew how to upload something of that size online without getting caught so it could be out there and he makes £5 instead of £500 in total. If anyone has a link to a dodgy copy then i would like a read even although i know it will be pish after pish after pish......just as it was from the very start.
  4. In those 4 games, by a country mile, the decision count went against us in every one of them. Is that fair ? Defo not. Is that acceptable ? Defo not. Do i believe the refs or officials set out to do it ? Defo not. I will say however that despite my views and what i say on bias etc, the only game that has made me uncomfortable about my views or certainly peaked my interest was ironically the CP game we won. That tested my resolve and im not sure if you saw the video that was pulled together with multiple incidents identified.
  5. I dont watch any of their games unless its v us. But i hear colleagues and others in the pub etc moaning just as much as i moan about our decisions. The one thing i do know is that the Stats prove 100% there is no bias against celtic so im readily available to shoot down anyone shouting conspiracy on their side. But they genuinely believe the refs and SFA are out to stop 10 in a row at all costs. And we have the above saying the refs and SFA are out to give them 10 at all costs. PS - I dont agree with it being shite reffing or utter incompetence. I am 100% of the opinion that officials make far less mistakes than players or managers. And they dont get 10 replays to get it right. Ive screamed black and blue at decisions both at the games and on telly then watched replays and had to have a bit of humble pie afterwards.
  6. I get as frustrated at these things as the next guy but it doesnt change my view there is no wide conspiracy. As an example, i believe Buffalo was lucky to stay on the park during the Beaton game last year. Then i dont think he should have been sent off against Motherwell or Aberdeen. We get away with some things and we are on the bad side of others. Its easy to remember the bad ones and overlook the ones we get away with. Same with the other mob.
  7. Sorry to say but there is no wide conspiracy to stop us winning anything. Ive said it loads of times that for every rant above from a Rangers fan, you will see the same rant naming the same refs by celtic fans. They think all refs are Rangers supporting Masons and "we" think all refs are celtic supporters. Its just nonsense to be honest. Refereeing and being a linesman is an incredibly difficult job, especially the speed things happen at. It is 100% humanly impossible to call tight offside decisions correctly. The vast majority of the time, its a gut feeling from the linesman and essentially its a 50/50 guess. They dont have enough eyes and VAR lines in their computerised brains to be able to process all the essential points to work it out. Handball at celtic Park, also extremely difficult to call. Of course there are in-explainable decisions like the rugby tackle on Morelos but the truth is they are few and far between. I just dont buy it. If we are good enough, we will win the league.
  8. Also @Virtuoso Just to confirm, the Board have came out and advised all shareholders to vote against the resolution, because as said, their legal team have confirmed its utter nonsense.
  9. Its UEFAs rules as opposed to being a law. In the past they have looked at what is deemed acceptable in a country either through football or political. The NI football authorities stated recently the Billy Boys was now completely unnaceptable which is why Linfield were done with it in 2016ish. In a decision which UEFA indicated that changing the words completely or even a little did not alter the meaning or intention behind the song. So as an extreme example, even if Gers fans sung the Edu song to the same tune or whistled it with no words, then UEFA would consider it equally as bad as the full version. The Scottish Government as part of the Offensive behaviour act set the stall out on the song and now UEFA will hear no more. Its simple ffs. Just drop it. Drop all the add ons. Drop all the stupid stuff. And sing for 90 minutes songs about the club. Its not as if we are struggling for songs for goodness sake. We will know our fate for the 2nd incident tomorrow and i wont be surprised if its a 1 game full enclosure which will cost the club £2m in lost revenue. PS - I am on a softer side of letting everyone sing what they want within reason as i dont believe that 16 year old boys want to wade in blood and equally dont believe the other lot want to kill us with bullets from the IRA. But we need to stop it.
  10. Jeez oh.... ? that's horrible news. RIP. ?
  11. If the boot was on the other foot then i would have wanted us to lose at Hibs and i would most certainly want us to lose at the weekend. No conspiracy for me. Horrible management decisions is the reason we are where we are.
  • Create New...