Jump to content

Bluejon

New Signing
  • Posts

    130
  • Joined

  • Last visited

2 Followers

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    Middle Earth

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

Bluejon's Achievements

Fringe Player

Fringe Player (3/12)

47

Reputation

  1. The SFA and Well will try to bury this incident. If Police do follow it up, there are a few Well players, and possibly staff, who will have to answer for their actions. The video show a few of them laying into Mohsni. SFA will HAVE to take action on them too and it will be Well who lose out on it. We all know how 'corrupt' the SFA is when dealing with anything to do with us, so I don't believe anything should be left in their hands when it comes to 'legal' matters. The ' 5 way agreement' should be sufficient evidence to prove my point.
  2. You really are fucked up. You started this off with posting a pile of lies, and now you say I'M deranged. Fox and Ian STILL haven't received the 'list' you're supposed to have sent them, so figure it out from there. Now they you know I'm not the person responsible for the bans, will you be calling for the dismissal of the person who has been doing the banning??
  3. Yes, I do believe you know him. If you think he's a buffoon (which I don't as he's entitled to his opinion) why did YOU 'like' his post? YOU may not like to talk about it anymore, but more than a few people are now. Don't forget to 'edit' you twitter feeds too. Btw - Rangerschat accounts can't be deleted. Pity you won't be in the Lobby there as a few people want to ask you questions about your posts here.
  4. 'Taig like'? I think one or two Ulstermen will be taking exception to that. Dunnys finally got his minions to come to his defense. ​
  5. I did reply, if you don't understand what I was saying, then fair enough
  6. Would have no problem with that mate - except it wasn't me who brought it on here. Have you told Dunny the same thing? As Dunny seems to have blocked me somehow, is he now calling for the person responsible for the banning to be sacked from Rangerschat? :
  7. Just as a follow up - Ian and Fox still haven't received the imaginary list the bare-faced liar Dunny claims to have. Are they still in the post. I notice Dunny has edited all his posts regarding his lies. Why is that Dunny?
  8. So you people think someone telling bare-faced lies about something should just be ignored? Ian, I don't see you make any statement regarding the 'list' Dunny has sent you. Do YOU, being admin on Rangerschat, agree with Dunny on this? I would much rather have done this in private, but as can be read, Dunny decided to air it in open, but refuses to 'engage' with me on the issue. So, is Dunny a bare-faced liar, or exposer of underhand tactics at Rangerschat?
  9. You made the accusation on here, so show the proof on here. Nothing you could do or say would ever embarrass me. So show everyone the list and let them decide if you're lying or not.
  10. For the past couple of years the Boards we've had have been under intense scrutiny mainly because of the Whyte fiasco. Why should that change now. I, for one, really do hope Dave King/3Bears make good on the promises made. We can then get back to doing what we do best which is support our team. Until such time, Rangerschat will continue to question the goings on at the club, as we have done, even though we were accused of being 'pro-board'. This was only because pro-King supporters wouldn't call in to put over their opinion. So if anyone feels they show has gone too far in one direction, call in and say why you think that to be the case. Unfortunately, we do get some people who only want to be abusive. Those calls tend to be dropped. We try to keep debates open and flowing, which means it can get heated at times.
  11. Voted with or, probably more accurately, didn't vote against him. Had the Easdale and Ashley votes gone against Dave King, it would have been a much closer contest. As I understand it, Dave King was told by Lambias that he had won the vote, so Lambias knew in advance the result. Easdale/Ashley share/proxy amounts to more than 30% so if they had abstained, as some reports claim, it would only have been a 70% vote cast. So taking into account the floating vote, with no attachment/loyalty to either side, it's possible to reach the conclusion that Ashley or Easdale, or both in some way supported Dave King.
  12. You hatred for me is beginning to leak out Dunny. Making accusations you can't support. Show the list of people whom I've banned for no reason. YOU were banned for threatening behaviour, and later reinstated, though I could have objected to that. Every accusation I've made against King has been backed up with reports, but I notice you haven't proven them wrong. So carry on making a complete dick of yourself and when you can PROVE me wrong, please do so. Until then, this "crank" will continue to ask relevant questions, no matter how much YOU dislike hearing opinions YOU don't agree with.
  13. Not just the media would be pissed off. Excellent idea. Give the PC brigade a GIRFUYs
×
×
  • Create New...