How could it be an unfair sporting advantage, when ceptic used them too? It's just they decided to stop after getting an inside tip-off, either from Reid, or from those who were leaking documents about our case from within HMRC. Indeed, is that tip-off for our rivals an unfair sporting advantage, just as they punted their entire squad into the dubious and infamous "movie rights" schemes? Perhaps that's why some of them aren't keen on title-stripping, as it might lead to campaigns which would uncover their other dubious schemes, including the property deals and Cooperative Bank's very cooperative interest rate on their loans, in which Reid is said to have had an influence. How could it be an advantage, when it was used against the Club to scare off investors, to the point that Whyte, now charged with a fraudulent takeover, was the only option? How could it be an advantage when it lead to a rejected CVA, a top tier expulsion and triple relegation for finishing second? How could it be an unfair advantage when half the English top tier was using them, with the FA helping 8 of them to mediate with HMRC, without ever considering penalties for any supposed unfair advantages? Bang on m8