Jump to content

Hoosier Ranger

Senior Member
  • Posts

    5,473
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    4

Everything posted by Hoosier Ranger

  1. No..reading comprehension is not your strong point. I said what RFC earned in profit per the accounts. Profits are different than dividends. There are no guarantees on dividends at this point...especially with a boycott going on. Wouldn't be surprised to see only 60-80% released this year with 20-40% held back as working capital.
  2. Per the accounts, RFC earned £2.60 for every £10 this year while the overall profit percentage for RRL was 52%. Dave King and the Board signed off on the accounts and made a statement confirming the amount earned ($1M). This year's profit is probably the primary reason why the Board has decided to pay the loan to SD off prior to the Board of RRL declaring dividends for the year. It is a smart business decision given the potential dividend this year from the huge profit.
  3. Get back to the fryer... Break is over
  4. You happy with zero quid cash from these shorts going to the club this year?
  5. But you agree that the club receives no cash from these shirts. 0 quid for every 10 quid .....given that a share issue is a year away per Gilligan.
  6. The club receive zero cash from the profits this year. That's 0 quid out of every 10 quid spent. Since Gilligan said a share issue is medium to long term, cash flow will not flow to the club for 2-3 years. In terms of cash flow, SD deal is better than this unless the RST change their terms.
  7. If the profits are being held by the RST for the next share issue, doesn't that mean that the club receives 0.00 out of every 10 quid sold if you use the same terminology that the RST uses for sports direct?
  8. Come on...now you have me curious. Let go of your little peanuts and fire away your question to them. Hopefully it will be something other than a quote from the IRA like The Dude shat out.
  9. Can someone post the video to youtube?
  10. True.....the only difference is that some are non-profit
  11. D'Art...how do they do that type of stuff without selling training gear and tops?
  12. Crazy shit. Sounds like a hit. RIP...had just seen him play against Canada a month ago.
  13. Must not have been enough self-promotion involved.
  14. I have asked the question of...what has the year long protest against Sports Direct accomplished for the club? Outside of lining the pockets of those that organize the protest, what progress has been made on the contract (outside of the profits of the JV)?
  15. IF you can't get one signed in crayon, what good is that?
  16. Still taking "claims that he and followers called other bears and their kids scum with a pinch of salt."?
  17. I think the "scum" chants occur around 6:28 in the first video....
  18. A number of reasons I am sure...financially that club has lost a lot of money..plus, there seemed to be a willing buyer. Some folks didn't like the power struggle between a turd and a giant douche and the damage that was being done to the club as a result of this battle.
  19. Because there were existing shareholders willing to sell as well as current shareholders that were willing to increase their shares through subsequent purchases.
  20. No difference at all to be honest. With regards to Sports Direct, the club is not in a better place with regards to its relationship and deal with Sports Direct. With regards to the ownership changes at Ibrox, no difference either unless he is claiming to have loaned King and T3B the money to have purchased stock in the club to achieve a sizable ownership percentage.
×
×
  • Create New...