billmcmurdo

Ssshh Don't tell the thousands who read my blog every day - you'll burst the bubble

http://billmcmurdo.wordpress.com/2012/12/20/charles-green-everything-is-for-sale/

http://www.thecoplandroad.org/2012/12/celtic-supporting-solicitor-ruins.html

http://billmcmurdo.wordpress.com/2012/12/19/the-strong-arm-of-the-law/

http://www.thecoplandroad.org/2012/12/by-bill-mcmurdo-cro-editor-at-large-cro.html

Very simple. He had answered those questions to others. Why ask the same questions over and over? The piece we did on CW was to give him his say.

http://billmcmurdo.wordpress.com/2012/12/11/things-they-dont-want-you-to-know/

http://billmcmurdo.wordpress.com/2012/12/05/biting-the-hand-that-feeds/

http://billmcmurdo.wordpress.com/2012/12/02/the-green-seat-brigade/

http://www.thecoplandroad.org/2012/11/tell-your-sons-and-daughters.html

http://billmcmurdo.wordpress.com/2012/11/21/triumphant-tuesday/

The OP post came from CRO. CRO was unaware that RTC had uploaded the docs. As, it appears, were most bears. CRO did NOT get the docs from the RTC blog.

http://www.thecoplandroad.org/2012/10/the-david-murraycraig-whyte-share.html

Cheers, mate. I don't expect everybody to agree with everything I write. It's snidey people I have no time for. I don't "get" them either. But I guess not everybody has the same things at heart, after all.

Wasn't offended, just being clear. I knew you weren't directing it at me.

I don't recall calling anyone on here a taig just to be clear.

Don't have a problem with people disagreeing but when the remarks are snide or a personal dig I will give as good as I get. I don't come on to Bears forums to have a pop at other bluenoses so I expect the same courtesy from other people.

Just returning your serve, Educator. You are the one who questioned what my blog had to do with Rangers. Why don't you ask all the Rangers fans who like it? That you don't maybe says more about you...

Have you got a "Jim Fixed It For Me" badge in your keepsake box? And I didn't bring it up - it's a news item.

Like the BBC you mean? As regards my blog, I get plenty of support from real Rangers people, thanks. Plastics, on the other hand, I couldn't care less about...

Saville's guilt is not the point of the story - the BBC cover up is. You say the programme didn't run. Which one? The Newsnight one pulled because it DID uncover evidence or the ITV one showing this week? Then you say are we back to believing everything written in rags after citing a news report to back you up. Which is it? We believe the news reports or not? I don't even know which news report you are referring to. The news reports I have in my source files all point to the Newsnight programme being pulled because the investigators uncovered stuff that would embarrass the BBC. Which is the point of the blog - cover-up at the BBC. Something which appears to be of interest to many Rangers supporters who are fed up of their club being attacked by this media organisation.

It's a free country. For now.

Some Catholics are signing it because they are being stigmatized as Protestants just because they support Rangers. They know there is a religious dimension to the attack on Rangers. Rangers are perceived as a Protestant club by its enemies. If you read my blogs you will see I refute that Rangers are a Protestant club. The petition was designed to include all people who are under attack in this country under the broad banner of Protestant, Unionist, Loyalist and Rangers supporter. If none of these apply, don't sign it. Our enemies label us with these labels. And many of our support self-identify by these labels. You don't need to be a Muslim to sign a petition supporting rights for Muslims. And you don't need to sign a petition supporting rights for Protestants if the word Protestant offends you. You have the freedom to sign or not sign. Thanks to the Protestant Reformation, of course.

The rationale behind the petition is here:- www.thepeopletogether.webs.com It is not a "proddy" petition. Catholics are signing it because they identify with some of it. The only objections so far are from Rangers fans who object to the word "Protestant" And that's why it is in the petition. When Protestant stops being an offensive word, we will have no need for a petition like this. You will see that Unionists, Loyalists and Rangers supporters can be people of all faiths and none.

" the Commission’s mandate should allow it to investigate and extract testimony under oath as to the utilization by all clubs of the concept of multi-contracts separating wages for playing football from other services."