Jump to content

billmcmurdo

First Team
  • Posts

    1,081
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by billmcmurdo

  1. Sadly I did....never again....

    At least you have impressed a few nutters and got the attention you craved.

    Anyway I'm of to watch the rest of the game in the pub and support my country, you can go and blog about us plastic fans who have had season tickets for 27 years and still dare to do that.

    P.s. stop pretending you have "sources" it's cringeworthy.

    The very nub of it. Off to support your country.

    Wondered where all that hate came from...

  2. He knows fuck all...there is no "source"

    He has seen a chance to attack a guy who has been having a go at rangers and wants to make a name for himself....the fact he has to use a stadium disaster to do it doesn't seem to bother him.

    these guys who are going "on the attack" on our behalf are making a right royal arse of it, I wish they would give us all a fecking break and shut up....

    You are free to do your own blog

    But one thing I've noticed

    Plastic bears never do...

  3. Ive read a few of your blogs and some are spot on, some not so much. Ive never felt compelled to criticise any of your blogs in the past which if nothing else means you are miles ahead of Leggo. You got this one woefully wrong, but it is my opinion.

    You do lose some credibility though by using Leggo as backing you up. If you are a regular reader of this place then you will have seen that Leggos stature has went down the drain rapidly recently, though a couple of recent blogs at least suggested that he had calmed down a little.

    It might help if you look again at the tweets and recognise the many contributions from all over the UK which clearly indicate the topic of discussion was not Rangers related.

    I actually suspect from reading a few of your posts on here that you now realise that you may have made an error but feel you can justify your error by using "aye but" statements about apparent previous form.

    A convinced author wouldnt feel the need to (tu)

    I didn't say Leggo backed me up. I said he, along with others - some of whom have more knowledge than yourself as regards the background- came to a conclusion AT was having a snide dig.

    The day I go through this or any other forum to see if what I blog will meet the approval of others is the day I chuck it. Especially "friendly" fire shootists like yourself.

    As for being convinced about something, I am very sure that the same compliment I gave Alex Thomson on my blog about how good a baiter he is applies equally to yourself.

  4. You dont know what Ive done for Rangers. (tu)

    Perhaps you can tell me what he has done for Rangers but please exclude his support for Craig Whyte and his unhinged obsessional hatred for Charles Green (tu)

    Won't be debating that one with you for the simple reason I have better things to do.

    Suffice to say it would really pain me to think you ever read my blog so feel free to desist from doing so.

    As for whether or not Leggo would feel the same about you reading his blog again,

    in the words of the man himself...

    I couldn't possibly comment.

  5. Now thats not strictly true is it. And this is exactly what i mean.

    He was talking about not having seen many wasps this year and people from Swindon says there were loads there. Someone from Liverpool said they had been attacked by loads. People from his local place started talking about bats. More joined in on the wasps including a MP. Someone from Crieff said there had been swarms. Then another guy about wasps in Oban. Back to Liverpool. Then the comment about them being like Daleks.

    You are entitled to your opinion but i like to call it as i see it and on this occasion 2 and 2 has got to 9 in mine. (tu)

    Other people who analysed the feed came to the same conclusion as myself. Including David Leggat, who first blogged on it. With all due respect, their opinions trump yours in my book.

    You are entitled to your opinion, though.

  6. I'm a huge fan of bloggers, I have the utmost respect for most but do you ever feel that these types of pieces give the unwashed exactly what they want? A seemingly angered Rangers support jumping on every word said as they are known for doing?

    This honestly isn't an accusation, just a question I'm unsure of the answer to. I believe we need to highlight the mud being slung our way but wonder whether it sometimes does more harm than good. Like I say, I'm not saying this is the case with your piece, just a question worthy of consideration.

    Yes yes yes.

    But not "seemingly" angered.

    Actually angered.

    Hot with rage and ready to pounce on every slight or jibe.

    More harm than good? Maybe one or two things.

    But in general being offended has worked for the other side.

    We've been the tail wagged by the dog too long.

    The best analogy is an angry bear.

    If you've ever seen one, you'd know why nobody messes with them.

  7. Just out of curiosity, did you read all the tweets pre the dalek reference from various people all over the UK and if so, what makes you believe this was or could have been intentional.

    The thing that im against is that for years we have been angered at veiled comments from bloggers on the other side that the masses turn into fact and for me its very hypocritical to take what looks like an innocent conversation(and i have read all the tweets) and to do the same.

    There are enough people out there who hate us to attack without inventing some of our own. For the record this only relates to this dalek thing as a lot of his other stuff is cringeworthy shite and he absolutely has a bee in his green bunnet.

    Yes I did. He was talking to Celtic fans about wasps and then compared them to Daleks - saying wasps that talk like Daleks.

    ???????

    If my five-year-old boy said this to me I would tell him to stop talking rubbish.

    He then said Discuss.

    Discuss about wasps talking like Daleks. In context to Celtic fans?

    One of whom has pulled a section of the thread off his Twitter, I am led to believe.

    Minutes later he tells a Rangers fan he is like an angry wasp.

    As I said, there is other stuff that backs up the likelihood that AT was having a wee dig.

    On top of his form already, of course.

  8. As the guy who wrote the piece let me throw my tuppence in.

    I wasn't familiar with the Dalek thing. I think I may have heard it but, not being a massive fan or collector of Ibrox Disaster jokes it's not one I would earmark for the after-dinner circuit.

    It was a good source - a trusted bluenose - who tipped me off to its meaning.

    I subsequently made some further enquiries and discovered it was a known slur among the dhims.

    My source also told me that Thomson learned it from a Celtic blogger - not 3 Names - he is known to hang around with.

    This man has previously been outed on the old FF forum as using this sick joke.

    If a tree falls in the forest and no-one hears it, does it make a sound?

    If there is a joke you haven't heard, does it exist?

    As Shane says, when you put the credibility of a PROVEN Disaster-mocker and Rangers-hater like Alex Thomson above that of fellow bluenoses, it's a sad day.

    This isn't said in arrogance but you sometimes have to accept that when myself and other bloggers say certain things we know a wee bit more than we actually say.

    That said, we can get it wrong.

    Thomson has wriggle room in this story, that's for sure.

    But it keeps the pressure up on Rangers' enemies, of which he is one for even surer.

×
×
  • Create New...