Jump to content

daviecooper01

New Signing
  • Posts

    2,706
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

Everything posted by daviecooper01

  1. Extremely poor. But TBH it has been com8bg for weeks. This team is nowhere near ready even for the mince that is the Scottish Premiership. That we will win the league season is probable. But teams are wise to the single dimension stuff that we seem to lapse into when Plan A does not work. Centre defence has been wrong all season. Today it got found out.
  2. They already have a section which requires no one to be moved. Why should their wishes rank higher than anyone else's?
  3. They are being forced to move. Sign up or ship out was our new MD's first contact with ST holders. PR at its very best.
  4. Why should their wishes be taken ahead of say 30 year st veterans? They can stay where they are. They went there. They don't like it, tough.
  5. Hmmm....Doesn't say that. And if only one section why email all st holders in CR? Poor idea. Badly conceived and terribly implemented.
  6. Why should a loosely organised group such as UB or BO get priority or any special treatment over other mostly longer standing st holders who are not in any wee fan group? What makes the UB so special?
  7. You could explain please why having previously boycotting neds most of whom are not old enough to remember pre Souness, leaping around far away from the pitch brings a better atmosphere....
  8. Indeed. And the more I think about it, despite this being the first public act by our new MD, this has been in the works for weeks. Before the EGM. Before MD appointment and crucially obviously before ST renewals.
  9. I am more than a little concerned not only by this proposal but by the fact it seems to be the first public action of our new MD. NOT a good start!
  10. Doesn't matter who has to move. Why should they have to in order to accommodate these groups?
  11. What gives them the right ahead of long held st already in cr?
  12. But it would be OK to force long held st holders from CR to say BF then again if we play them.... No. They have a section. Many boycotted.
  13. And that makes it ok? Screaming for transparency on the SD contracts yet ignoring same on their own setup.
  14. But you do seem to know quite a lot of details and perhaps those involved (?) If so perhaps assisting with getting this info released would be an idea....
  15. Esk. So if the guys running the red and black shirt deal are so clear and good, why can a simple breakdown of where the sales price of each shirt goes not be provided? Should be extremely easy. Take minutes really.
  16. So rather get a strange top and some of that purchase price then goes to club than buy tickets where all the money goes to club? Again those behind the red and black stuff could clear this all up immediately with publication of full cost breakdown. Why will they not do this?
  17. Transparency? And as I said, why not simply ask folk to give the full £35 direct to the club instead of getting daft looking unofficial tops with all the work and bad publicity that us coming with it? Why can they not just tell us exactly where the full £35 goes? Transparency.
  18. One is a commercial operation the other supposed to be only for the club. So again why not just encourage 100% of sales price to go to club instead of only part? If they are taking nothing out it actually makes their life easier.
  19. So as long as "Rangers men" get cuts it is ok? How about instead of buying a red and black top for 35 you donate direct to club by buying ticket? That way club gets all of the pie.
  20. SD and Ashley run a commercial operation. The red and black tops claim to be only for support of club not a commercial operation. Big difference.
×
×
  • Create New...