But that's NOT the approach we are taking. We have already removed the contentious stuff.
Also, flippant remarks like yours (or unsubstantiated claims like Spiers') don't achieve the objectives you claim to want. They only cause further division.
On reflection, it appears you're right. It has caused further division (see posts above ). That was not the intention.
I would like to agree that we have removed the contentious stuff but we both know that is not the case...to an acceptable level anyway. It will never be completely irradicated, that's just unrealistic, but the best way to get it up the journos is to stop fueling the fires which have been fueling their which hunt.
Still no examples.
I said it was a flippant remark, yes?