willygers4life

Till ch condemns the fans that abused fans for going into the megastore with their kid (s). Then he is just as much to blame as anyone else for abusing fans. But as lawman said our chairman put a statement in the accounts about the profit from the merchandise deal. Does that not equate to more than what the rst is giving to the club percentage wise

When the sos and their sheep was calling fans scum for going into the megastore at the last gang bang they had, didnt they have a banner spouted the pish about 5p in the £ or whatever it was, has ma/sd sued them then since you make a basic claim that's what would happen if a banner was shown about it

Looking for a good game with plenty of goals, and someone to stamp their authority on gibbons early on

It's if these guarantees are fulfilled, currently we have loans outstanding that the board are hoping to be converted to shares. Do you really think they will allow any other shareholder to get shares before they are paid back

But currently and till there is actually a share issue the club doesn't benefit. The only actual way the club will benefit is from the other suggestions yourselves, others and my self have mentioned

The thing is rst can't guarantee anything till a share issue is actually announced and arranged, till there is one the rst is giving as much to the club as rrl is. Correct am I not. And we keep hearing from the board how the ongoing court cases is making it hard to have a share issue. So really the club is not benefitting in this at all

So what money from this money making scheme is going to the club right now. And what money is going to the club right.now.from rrl

The only thing we know is what king agreed and stated in the accounts about,think it was profit, that was made for merchandise

I actually think some fell that's it ok to ask question as long it isn't asking questions about supposed supporter groups out for themselves

Well if that's correct that I apologise, but it was never corrected that it changed from 50 50 split of any profits. But till their accounts are out and shows the break down of it then no one actually knows how much will be set aside for the share issue. And till that share issue happens the club will benefit as much from this as they do from rrl. Am I correct about that or not

The rst stated before that any of their merchandise would then be split from profits, that would then be 50% goes to a share issue pot and the other 50% into someone pocket i presume. Except no one actually knows what the profit will be, so can't actually state more money will go to the club than rrl will give to the club from our 51%

The clause is 'ask no questions, hear no lies'

It was always mentioned before in the statements that was any profit would be spelt 50-50, haven't seen anything saying that has changed, so no one really knows what will go to the pot for buying shares.

Except it ain't 50% of their sales it's actually been stated all along its 50% of profit. But what exactly is there profit. Also they tout there gear as an alternative to official merchandise, they are trying to get fans to wear this as as the match day gear instead of official tops. The rst are looking out for themselves rather than for the benefits of the club. If they were truly in this for the benefits of the club they would actually be advising the fans in other ways to get money in the club instead of it being all rst or nothing.

Now surely ff and Dingwall are to be trusted lol

Goal of the game

Nah 4-0 now

Kenny has earned his wage and bonus today. Nothing fancy just simple football

Is that not if it's the same country rather than cross border transfers

Fyvie got nutted at school cause he was mouthing off after he signed youth terms with aberdeen, he was bragging about being better than everyone and said it to the wrong person. This came from a lad I worked with that was at school with him. Fyvie was disliked by most folk, he thinks he is doing great the way he acts against us.

Buying Rangers merchandise is not and never will be siding with Ashley. It is showing your support for the club and players, while also showing who the greatest team in world is. Yes Ashley makes a pretty profit off it but so would rangers if fans was to buy more. We also have staff costs to cover aswell as other bills in the store to pay. But don't let that put You off your agenda driven hatred of all.things Ashley

And when did king come out and say to boycott buying club merchandise. But hey let's just cost the club money eh. Yiu go join up with ff where freedom.of speech is stifled and everyone agrees with you

This ain't about the vb. But going by what I read on here, they only sell to their members and they don't advertise their car boot sales flogging crap. Now don't deflect from the point I made. If the rst was all about doing what's bes t for rages then they would mention the legit alternatives in their statements when flogging the knock offs. That way the club gets 100% of the money don't they, and that's what we all want ain't it

But it's not as good as buying stuff from Rangers directly, like rangers tv subscription, rising stars or even match day tickets. So in that situation they are taking from the club like Ashley is. If the rst was putting the club first then they would be advocating the fans to buy things from the club that I have mentioned, while also going down the route they are, but currently it seems the rst is all about rst rather than being about Rangers

The thing is if it's about getting as much shares in fans hands, why is it just a need to go all in with the rst of RF, why not when arranging things like this, with the statements and press releases, instead of snide digs about the money goes to the club, why not also suggest taking the money to buy a subscription torangers tv or buy half time draw tickets and the rangers lotto, and even suggest folk by there own shares and it means they get to vote whatever way they want rather than to fund someone else to buy up shares. Something for esk to answer, why doesn't the rst actually highlight that fans should buy from the club shop due to there being overheads to cover, but it's their opinion that money should be spent elsewhere like the event yesterday.