Jump to content

willygers4life

Senior Member
  • Posts

    3,618
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by willygers4life

  1. I agree apart from I would keep Crawford and Mitchell, try and get a fee or free transfer the ones to move on
  2. Does it not say in the report two players that won't be going is Wallace and daly. It's now a case of ally being able to manage a team to success rather than buy it.
  3. Your lucky I bought the missus plenty and as a reward for me she works so I got the baby to look after, no game for me on boxing day
  4. Your lucky I bought the missus plenty and as a reward for me she works so I got the baby to look after, no game for me on boxing day
  5. The board or should I say Wallace has said they are going to discuss with current investors about new investment, maybe stop worrying about agenda driven problems and watch me Wallace's interview on rangers tv. Also before further investment to board wants to sort out what and where the money is going. If that means telling ally he getting offered a new contract on highly reduced wages then so be it, can see ally being told it either durrant or McDowell, also several players like smith and that will be told they are being released or offered less wages
  6. i agree with everything you said, if he dont turn it around he needs to be honest and say he fucked up today rather than his daft excuses, but hoping that we turn it around
  7. no is the time for ally to prove us wrong and show why he earns so much, and i dont mean with his excuses either. needs to change the time and get something sorted asap
  8. what is both teams not on the park, or are you ally, that an excuse he will come out with, both teams playing in same conditions, so no excuse for that is there
  9. They took him to court and won did they not, if he don't pay not the club that is liable. So they cant then can't base the club for the money, and how are they meant to plug that gap in their accounts with having shares in the club. Doesn't add up does it.
  10. So what makes you guess that it is ticketus, I haven't seen anything to suggest this,
  11. Yes I know but its not the easdales that is trying to force change is it, and it wasn't the board either but its them that gets the constant attacks about showing their hand and their plans, but Murray and co don't get none of that, easdales have made their money probe by being shrewd and make harsh decisions, what makes anyone think they feel they need to realise statements. They will make their plans known when they feel they need to, I don't disagree with your op, but it should be a equal street. If they need their plans in the open to keep their 50% of the votes or whatever, then shouldn't Murray be making his plans known to actually get votes he needs, as currently of I was a shareholder I wouldn't be voting for him, cause he ain't made anything that makes it clear what he actually wants to do. Says he not worried about being on board so why try and get voted on then and take the club to court to get that pleasure. What I am trying to say is trust the easdales, what they done in the past won't do with the spotlight being on them with being involved with rangers, due to them being under scrutiny
  12. I don't it think they should speak now but more that they need to speak now, but none of this running to the media and that but through the club instead, but it should be an equal walk down the same street, people calling for them to state their plans. But then so should Murray and that, or is his plans the same from the tbk days and involve ticketus. Or maybe it a case of the easdales keeping there cards close to their chest ready to play a joker card, and bring out something that really is for the good of the club. It more a case of wait and see, but yes they didn't buy all their shares in the IPO but bought shares from people that was chased and people that didn't want to be around no more. So remember that, can't all have your cake and eat it.
  13. Last time I watched this was when a Steven watt played for Scotland,played in school teams with him and against in under 10s and that, good lick to the young rangers lads
  14. So lets say Murray and his lot get in, don't make a profit does that mean he is a spiv and theif as well, or is it cause he a supposed rangers man along his his lot, its ok to make a loss on the accounts
  15. If Paul Murray has the clubs best interests, why is he the common factor in factions trying to get on the board, also did Malcolm Murray get a pay off to leave the board, if he did and now wants back would he not in the best interests of the club hand back the payment. As far as my opinion is they have been there done it and failed. Its time for them both to move on, cause now its about them and not the club.
  16. Tell me how minico won, as far it is concerned they have only succeeded in delaying the agm, nothing is won, the only losers in this just now is the club and the shareholders who have booked time off their work to go to this, those are the people who are out of pocket. But if Murray loses the agm vote and others get in, and they turn out to be as some groups and fans call it to be spivs, will all those people and Murray call for them to be out, or will it be ok cause these people are so called rangers men
  17. Aye U can, my mate got them on the 29th last month
  18. Also Dave king has stated that his appointment is not determined to include any other person, so the great news story today stating that king would only join the board if pm got included was bollocks, but everyone that believed the news must feel a bit stupid now
  19. Right people keep going on that pm is a TRUE rangers man, well we all are rangers men on here yes. If any of us was minted to the point of buying the club when we was in admin, any one of us would have, correct me if I am wrong. So why didn't this so called rangers man not actually put the fuck up. He made excuse after excuse, so I am sorry in my opinion after that and his constant attempts at screwing the club up, he ain't no rangers man
  20. Simple answer about pm, if he loved the club as much as he claims then why didn't he buy shares in the IPO, along with everyone else, if he loves the club why ain't he been forthcoming with how he could benefit the club. I distrust him, he wants everything for nothing, also daily record or whatever paper says that dk said he only getting involved if pm brought back. Don't believe till the board or the man himself releases a statment. As only the other day, there was no statement to be released by dk. So believe what you all want without the actual facts to show
×
×
  • Create New...