glasgowrangersno1

Not a member no. Well that's fair enough then I suppose. Stockbridge would be the first one I would remove. That video getting released was utterly shameful. He is a friend of Green and therefore I cannot trust him one bit.

That's what me, amongst many others replied when people questioned Craig Whyte. I do not want something similar to happen again. The board at the moment is totally dysfunctional and the very fact they've flown out to meet King sets alarm bells ringing for me.

Sorry but I don't think the investing money argument is valid. Mather, for example, invested £1m but will make that from the club in 2/3 years. Who's to say Jim McColl won't invest once people he trusts are on the board? We all know that he could write a cheque today and buy them all out but he doesn't want to pay over the odds and line the current shareholder's pockets. He, like King, wants his money to benefit Rangers. That's my grasp of the situation anyway. My main issue is I cannot trust guys like Stockbridge as he is an acquaintance of Green/Ahmad.

Scanned through it and saw the word cheating so stopped. What is wrong with these people?

I knew a guy who used to give it loyalist tunes on the way to school, I saw him playing 5's last year wearing a scum top....

I'm underwhelmed at times by the 'grilling' the board get at these meetings. I'm not sure how the people are selected but maybe it needs looked at.

Nothing of the sort, have a read at what I've posted so far. I couldn't really care less about petty squabbles between groups of fans, I care about Rangers. All you are really doing is confirming what I thought. All you want to do is rubbish what I'm saying as 'pro RST' rather than actually read and reply to what I'm saying.

Because the well being of the club is far more important that what we are doing on the park at the moment?

Give yourself piece. I registered with this forum to try and understand why people want to current board to remain, I'm still no further forward. Try answering that instead of making daft comments.

It seems to me a lot of people are missing the point. Have we learned nothing from the Craig Whyte debacle? We must ask questions of everyone until we know we can trust them.

He obviously hasn't read this forum. I keep asking though, what is it people feel the current board are doing right? I don't get it. Or is this just about not agreeing with RST or FF?

Wallace is the best Scottish left back at the moment, no question. Let himself down with that last comment though

I'm not saying Rangers people have to run the club, far from it. What I'm saying is, we need to be able to trust the people who run the club and not to embarrass our great support. Green, Stockbridge, Ahmad (jury's out on Mather for me) have been an embarssment and I have lost all trust in them. After Whyte I cannot trust someone who comes out of the blue and no 'Rangers men' can endorse. Regarding Paul Murray being on the current board, I believe he takes collective blame but I don't think you can hold it against him forever, he was just one board member who, in the end, were powerless when the bank came in. This is about more than petty agendas against RST or FollowFollow, this is about our club.

Love it. Is expect a certain group of people might not haha.

If people are openly saying ''I don't want King or Murray" then that suggests the current board are a better option. I'm not going to say Murray or King are the best thing since sliced bread or anything of the sort, the main points are trust and stability. These guys are Rangers men, and while they may not be businessmen of the year or the answer in the long term(although they might be) they are not their to line their own pockets which is what the current board are clearly doing.

Can someone explain to me the support for the current board? What is it that makes people think Mather and Stockbridge are doing a good job and can take this club forward?

Would like to see him start the next game to see how he goes. He's a goalscorer.

Hope Nacho does well there