Jump to content

Youllneverwinaway

New Signing
  • Posts

    2,983
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Youllneverwinaway

  1. whare i was the day a few said they haerd the scum fans singing u black b----rd, when bouggie and edu cleared at our end, dunno when exact but first 25 easy, im gonna have to wait at replays, i dinna think they would but they believe thats what was sung

    It was maybe you fat bastard... I know that was getting belted out at Mcdonald

    Heard that as well just after Skippy had performed yet another swan dive.... (tu)

  2. There were times during the match when their support sounded as if we were outnumbered 7-1.

    The only logical explanations are that the microphones were placed at their end or they turned ours down.

    Yet another match where the pictured jumped from time to time.

    I don't think I'll be renewing after this month.

    Heard from a few of my mates at the game we outsung them but you would never have known from the Shitanta coverage. Clearly some of the sound crew were sitting in the Broomloan themselves.

    Its a difficult one though as without it, you miss some games. :-(

  3. Never thought I'd say this, (either about the subsitution and the manager)....BUT bringing on Lafferty to LM effectively WON us the game today. I feared Smith would have got a roasting in the last 15 mins.

    WS bringing on Lafferty WAS a master stroke! Tactical genius...almost! :praise:

    I know im being picky here but......... Lafferty came on and played striker. Kenny Miller shifted to LM.

    Apart from that, i dont want to over criticise on a day we should be celebrating. I still want Smith to go, SPL or not (tu)

  4. Reminds me of the old joke about the 2 guys who get to the turnstyles and one turns to the other and says "I wish i had brought ma telly to the game with me the day" "How" enquires the other guy with a really confused look on him. "Cause ma ticket is sitting on top of it" :lol:

  5. We are governed by the FSA and have rules that we must abide by and are members of Supporters Direct.

    Just noticed this. Direct Sharedeal Glasgow are authorised and governed by FSA. The RST are merely a representative of them and have no direct responsibility to the FSA.

    Yet more smoke and mirrors....

    Oh and another thing....can you confirm if you are a member of the board, because you really shouldnt be asking for Personal data from others if you are not. It breaches the Data Protection Act...

  6. Yes, this is a poor Rangers side and an equally poor celtc side but today the players have a chance to make themselves heroes.

    It is in our hands and if we can't beat them at home it will show that we aren't good enough.

    Time for every player to stand up and be counted, No room for passengers today.

    My heart says Rangers 2-0 whilst my head is not so sure.

    :clap:

    Can i sue for plagiarism of my own thoughts ? :lol:

  7. I would have to agree cooperonthewing should either provide facts or resign, it's bad enough having liars run our club without the fans groups suffering the same fate.

    P.s I know there is no facts to provide.

    Again, one of the Trust ironies. They talk about SDM and his lies and smoke and mirrors in one breath then in another they lie about their membership size and the likes of the above.

  8. Why is the actual number of members a big secret? I paid for one year membership and didn't renew, although I still recieve invitations to AGM's and whatnot. Do I get to know the figures?

    I think it may be to save some embarrasment to be honest. For an organisation to have 5,000 "claimed" members and for it to decrease to around 800 members does not send the right message. It has been said before about the Irony in the situation where the RST are complaining how SDM runs a 40 million pound business when they cant even run a 800 member business themselves.

    I have said from my first day on here that their allignment to FF is their downfall. The leaders of the Trust are actually breaching their own codes and rules due to their connections to the above website on the basis that Rangers FC will have nothing to do with them. (tu)

    You know, I'm not sure what your problem is, you keep spouting so much crap that I really should ignore you. Okay, I'll bite. Tell me what 'codes and rules' we are breaching and tell me why Rangers FC will have 'nothing to do with us' when, in fact, they have requested two meetings wth us? As for your 800 figure, please!

    Im not sure i need to answer as i think you have been shown up by the few guys above but i will give you the courtesy. The aim of the Trust, and you have included it in your summary, is to get a fans voice on the Board. Until you lose the FF connection and im thinking the very name mentioned in the posts above, SDM will NEVER EVER allow any of you anywhere near the Board. This means that by alligning yourself to FF, you actually make the achievement of one of your CORE goals, in fact, THE CORE GOAL, of any trust an impossibility.

    Anyways, i see you have bigger fish to fry and i look forward to reading your responces to the other guys... :rolleyes:

  9. I think he is just poor at his job

    Great to see the usual people stick up for Murphy though. If you attempt to injure one of our players, lie about one of players wanting to leave the club or come down on the side of an official who has given 50/50 decisions against us you know who will be there...

    If only these guys would defend the club they turned there backs on so quickly........

    I defend the club in more ways than you can imagine and in more ways than you will ever find out. I know the above is aimed at me so to clarify. I never LIED about players wanting to leave the club. I got it wrong and I ADMITTED IT.

    Officials get things wrong. I cant help it if people spout shite in the hope all the lemmings follow on. Thats a Timmy trait and has been for years. Say it enough times and people start believing it.

    As for the Mendes injury, it was a 50/50 challenge, both had their feet up and the huge hole in his knee, even although it was his thigh, never prevented him from playing only 6 days later.

    Now stop stalking ma posts.. :dry:

  10. Given that it's general knowledge he's given a few bad decisions against us, it could work in our favour. With this much pressure on the game it might lead him to avoid 'favouring' them as much as possible.

    See to be brutally honest, he has given 2 borderline decisions against us. Decisions which are physically and humanly impossible to get 100% correct. All the other tosh spouted above is just that.... utter tosh.

    I reckon he will call it as he sees it tomorrow and i reckon on the whole, refs and their assistants do the same (tu)

    Some are really starting to sound and act like Timmy spreading a lot of shite in the hope people believe it and tell 10 to tell 10 (tu)

    Any chance you can stop ending quotes with those daft 'thumbs up' smilies ?

    Ok (tu)

    :craphead:

  11. Given that it's general knowledge he's given a few bad decisions against us, it could work in our favour. With this much pressure on the game it might lead him to avoid 'favouring' them as much as possible.

    See to be brutally honest, he has given 2 borderline decisions against us. Decisions which are physically and humanly impossible to get 100% correct. All the other tosh spouted above is just that.... utter tosh.

    I reckon he will call it as he sees it tomorrow and i reckon on the whole, refs and their assistants do the same (tu)

    Some are really starting to sound and act like Timmy spreading a lot of shite in the hope people believe it and tell 10 to tell 10 (tu)

  12. My ghast was flabbered at Tom Murphy's appointment to run the line in tomorrow's game, the empirical evidence against Tom is pretty damning reference both clubs involved. Maybe the SFA have decided to give Tom enough rope?

    My first memory of Tom at Ibrox was the old firm encounter that saw Dado Prso break through on to a pass, only to be halved in two by Sellik cenral defender, McManus. Kenny Clark immediately pointed to the spot and we deliberated on the colour of card to be waived in front of the seated and deflated McManus. Intervention came from dearest Tom, he stood, flag waving to attract referee Clark's attention. Reverse everything, Prso was offside, McManus stood up, Kenny pointed to a free kick for ra Sellik and the game restarted.

    In the last calander year, Tom has failed to flag Scot McDonald offside as he ran through to notch in the final old firm game of last season. TV proved McDonald to be a yard offside. Then, a trailing Sellik side at Falkirk received a huge boost as Nakamura's cross was headed in by a clearly offside Scot McDonald. Tom was racing back to the centre line with flag at his knees. At Fir Park in the autumn, Boyd was onside, took two steps and rifled an unstoppable shot into the roof of the net, but dearest Tom was back to standing errect with flag outstretched.

    Tom's decisions have been directly responsible for a 4-6 point turnaround this season in ra Sellik's favour, will he take the opportunity tomorrow to even that out? I hopw, whatever line Tom decides to run ie Main or Govan Stand tomorrow, that the denizens of those fine abodes take time to continually remind Tom of his duty to objectivity.

    :rolleyes:

    McDonald wasnt a yard offside. It was a bawhair but offside never the less.

    timmy have never been trailing Falkirk in the last year

    Falkirk havent scored against Timmy in nearly 2 years

    McDonald hasnt scored from a Naka cross v Falkirk in the last year

    Murphy wasnt the linesman in any of the Falkirk v Timmy games in the last year

    Prso was actually offside.

    Apart from that, you make a good point... :lol:

×
×
  • Create New...