crazy bob swollenbaws

He really is. Cunt that he is.

Ahem. Throw ins as well.

So again I ask. Why make allowances just for tav and not other past it players? Why invite enforced squad rotation decisions on our manager. Also, you seem to assume he is even good enough/strong spined enough for pressure keg games like against them. He is not. Like previous players such as boyd, ferguson etc he will be moved on and we will be glad.

Look mate. Sorry but I have to ask why the fuck we need to 1. Make changes elsewhere in the team to cater for tavs loss of ability. 2. Risk further trophy loss as a result of point 1. We are Rangers and no player is bigger than our club. You seem to infer tav is.

Pretty sure there is a reason we did so well in the closed door season. I have wanted a change of captain for a while now. Someone much more aggressive and not just a technocrat which I think is what tav is. As it is we need most of a new defence. Then we can look at the forward roles.

Someone will be on soon to tell you that the Armband is not that important in the modern game don't you know. Whole team should be leaders blah blah

We hardly did any shooting

This is it for me. If those two (tav and goldson) had any serious use at a senior level, we would have had offers. We have not for a reason.

Before his injury matondo was getting results coming on as sub when opposition legs were tired. We know it works. Stick with it. He is less affective as a starter in my view.

Fuck that. Not for us.

For fuck sake. That will never catch on.

Remember we tried that years ago with pushing him forward and sticking hodson at right back.

Much like the boyd arguments of old you seem to assume that we would not replace him with anyone. If the defence of which tav is a major part, could be trusted, we would also be a different proposition up from. Tavs prime role is defending and he is poor at this level.

Take tavs penalties out his stats and his appeal is much less salubrious

Ah well. Thems the breaks