crazy bob swollenbaws

Pretty sure there is a reason we did so well in the closed door season. I have wanted a change of captain for a while now. Someone much more aggressive and not just a technocrat which I think is what tav is. As it is we need most of a new defence. Then we can look at the forward roles.

Someone will be on soon to tell you that the Armband is not that important in the modern game don't you know. Whole team should be leaders blah blah

We hardly did any shooting

This is it for me. If those two (tav and goldson) had any serious use at a senior level, we would have had offers. We have not for a reason.

Before his injury matondo was getting results coming on as sub when opposition legs were tired. We know it works. Stick with it. He is less affective as a starter in my view.

Fuck that. Not for us.

For fuck sake. That will never catch on.

Remember we tried that years ago with pushing him forward and sticking hodson at right back.

Much like the boyd arguments of old you seem to assume that we would not replace him with anyone. If the defence of which tav is a major part, could be trusted, we would also be a different proposition up from. Tavs prime role is defending and he is poor at this level.

Take tavs penalties out his stats and his appeal is much less salubrious

Ah well. Thems the breaks

After yesterday, I agree.

To be fair mate, I reckon we could have much better corners in but still wouldn't score. From memory Katie and helander were always a threat. Not out current two.

Anyone know if we are still using that zone7 software?

Correct. Thought did not escape me as well. Been here far too long.

This. Our conversion rate for corners is fucking shocking. That changing will be a major sign of a proper Rangers for me. Won't happen with current centre backs or forwards tho.

Aye. That's him

Well done gers. Great performance. Dessers confidence should also be rising.

Every fucking time. He is a cheat bastard

Every fuckin game wae cunt McLean.

Thing is people would have placed bets on different results on Saturday from the 2-1 to sellick. So because of that a possible 2-2 draw was denied. I would argue there is a possible fraud implication Mistakes will always be made but as long as the process is followed that is OK. Process is meant to cater for those. Process was not followed here allegedly, could be incompetence, bias or attempted fraud.

Would need to know the format but I would hope there is a checksum in that metadata that is constructed from the pertinent information such as date and time, duration, the a tual audio information recorded. If any of that is altered then the checksum would not calculate correctly. Assuming it is digitally recorded and not old audio tape. Will do some research for mp3 and mp4 formats.

He has a very high opinion of himself

You are missing the point. The fact that ref and var did not see that as penalty is the issue. If they did then they would have said "off side free kick to ra sellick". The offside was a lucky get out.

Not with these officials he wouldn't.