Ross-Gazza genius

Same way it was a bit early for folk to be writing the season off coz we didn't bring in another striker. The fact we won something already should have been enough for people to be patient. Wouldn't be RM if folk weren't going OTT

We should be trying our best to keep him, he's been unreal for a while now. I know we have sterling but we need a squad and sterling can be used in a variety of areas. It's a no brainier for me, get him signed on a 3 year deal. Get rid of the other guf.

Remember when the cry babies were saying we won't win a league with Dessers up top in January 😂. I don't care if he misses a few chances, if he keeps scoring and we keep winning I'm happy.

Don't dispute that, but I know celtic fans who go there as it's their local so it can be a mixed crowd.

Tbh I think all pubs in ek are no club colours.

The village inn, just don't end up in legends. The Murray bar is mixed but most pubs are, generally whoever is playing is normally what support turn up.

I just gave you examples of where that is not always the case, you gave examples of the successful players and I'm merely pointing out that there is others which proves differently. Dodds 1st stint at Dundee utd he had a better scoring rate 27 goals in 55 games and at us 34 in 84 games. The main difference which even Boyd found out is that when you play for us we expect an all round game as goals will not save them from criticism and that's where some of these signings struggle. Boyd was slated at times as he struggled in Europe and against them, most recently Colak was criticised but had a decent record.

Sandaza had a better strike rate at St Johnstone and failed, Nicky Clark had a better strike rate at Queen of the south and failed and Billy dodds had a better strike rate at Dundee utd compared to his stint with us. There was also ciftci who had a better strike rate at Dundee utd and failed at them as well. Could have had Lafferty, Jon daly, Alan Gow as well. Fwiw I think Miovski is a great player and would excel with us.

Where are these comments??? Only players getting slated is Matondo and Raskin, everyone said he played well and showing signs of a good player.

Mind that time Raskin wanted to use us as stepping stone to Chelsea......he'd struggle to get selected for the woman.

Folk need to stop greetin when there's 30 mins to go that we're going to blow it. Chill out, they were always going to get a lift from a new manager being appointed.

Alec Cleland and Carlos Cuellar

If you bought it from the megastore you will be able to return it to any Rangers store, you will not be able to go to castore with it. That would be like buying a shit pair of nikes from sports direct and trying to return it to the Nike store 😆

Is that even a saying? Is it not clean up his act???

The way Lawrence walks always makes me think he's about to go down injured 😂

Sorry but for as long as Raskin has been here he just isn't good enough.

Quality professional, wish him nothing but luck in whatever he decides to do now.

He's only just turning 30 so has easily another 2 years in him before his legs will start to go.

Get rid of Raskin then as he is hopeless, apart from a stint when he 1st moved here, he has been garbage.

Never said anyone earning the same but getting guys like Roofe, Davies, Jack, Cifuentes, Matondo, Wright, Lammers and arguably Dessers off the wage bill would be more beneficial than someone who is playing a major role under the new manager. We would then start to build a squad round these important experienced players.

We might not get a monetary return on them but if they contribute to us possibly qualifying for the Champions league or extended runs in Europe then it's justified. At the moment Lundstram is pivotal to the way we play under PC and if he thinks we should be trying to keep him then I'll trust that. There's other players we should be saving money on, at this moment in time it's not Lundstram.

Hi Alfredo

Is this not exactly what you've just done?

As long as no sand castles were attacked it can't be that bad.

It's yet to be seen whether devine is good enough, but we'll find out in due course.