Jump to content

TheBillyBoys1872

New Signing
  • Posts

    209
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    Your missus dunghatch

Recent Profile Visitors

617 profile views

TheBillyBoys1872's Achievements

Fringe Player

Fringe Player (3/12)

25

Reputation

  1. That's what a share issue is all about. He doesn't own the club. At least wait till the share issue and see how much we generate. You're still failing to understand that the club needs to grow its income streams. No bank will touch us so we need those loans from the board and the others who put money in. The fact you've admitted King has put money into thr club backs up my point. The share issue will happen and we will see how much is invested. Is that fair?
  2. My point with him being on the board is if he didn't put money into the club the board would kick him of the board as he is doing fuck all and spends most of his time in South Africa. If you had a business and nominated a chairman to be chairman but he lived in South Africa and didn't bother his arse to be at Rangers full time, would you keep him on? Or get rid? You would get rid cause he is doing fuck all. But if he has out money or is putting money in then he would keep his seat as the club couldn't afford to get rid if he has the money. That's how i see it.
  3. So he has put money in? Yes? God ffs. That's all i said he did. It's money we never had and he helped pay up for thr clubs losses. If we spend in January who is going to pay if we buy a player? You just answered and proved my point.
  4. They clearly haven't ffs if they think a man can get on the board and be chairman without putting money in. So you're saying you could be the chairman and fly around the world whenever you want without putting any money in? Really? Wow, do you really believe has hasn't put money in?
  5. And I'm telling you. If he did fuck all and contributed nothing. Would he be on thr board? Yes or no?
  6. Where did I say he put in significant sums of money? I said he's put money in. I can't give you an exact figure i don't know the board personally. But am sure he's put in millions. It mighy not be a lot to some but its money Rangers don't have as we're running at a loss. That's all i was saying. I'm not a King fan or any board member fan. I am a Rangers fan. A fan that wants us to succeed but not be put at risk like administration. I want us to grow our brand and business and spend wisely till we're in a position we can spend larger sums of moneu. But that isn't going to happen anytime soon.
  7. I knew King didn't have his fans but people literally twisting the truth to support there argument. It's like they want us to fail. They're willing to put the club at risk so we can beat the tarriers. Half these idiots haven't been to school or any form of education. I've tried to explain why we can't spend 20 million and whatever huge sums of money being branded. It then gets turned into a Dave King argument. He may not be an angel but he's helped us. People can't prove King hasn't put any money in just proves my point altogether.
  8. I figured you couldn't prove it. You lost the argument. Have a good day
  9. And you've stated he's put no money in. So prove he's put no money in. I'm waiting. If you can't prove he's not put money into Rangers then it means he has put money in. You think he'd be on thr board, flying back and forth when he liked from South Africa if he didn't have money? Surely you can't be that fucking stupid?
  10. And I've said why we can't chuck money at it. If i knoe that don't you think King knows that now, now he knows what the fucks going on with Rangers. I've told you repeatedly now. You're asking me how much King has put in. I can't give you a definitive answer but it was more than Ashley did. It is more than anyone else on this forum. He wouldn't be on the board, who comes and goes when he pleases if he wasn't putting money in. I'm done repeating myself to you.
  11. The fact is you don't have evidence he hasn't put money in. So its a flawed argument which you consider an argument. I've proved it. Do you think a man who was nominated the chairman, doesn't need to be in the same county, comes.and goes when he pleases back to South Africa has no money or hasn't invested in Rangers? What sane person would allow King to be on the board then if he contributed nothing? Surely the board would have kicked him out if he has not invested. Again, prove he hasn't put money in. I'll await your response if you can find any evidence. Which you won't.
  12. I've told you. I couldn't give two fucks about King. But he is the man running our club. Who else would you suggest? Go ahead. And if he really is a liability as you say. Why not try and get him removed? Like protesting? Just a thought. Why don't you prove to all the Rangers support that Dave King doesn't have two pennies to rub together. Is using Rangers for whatever it is he's using us for. Go ahead. Cause if i believed that shite was the truth I'd be doing everything in my power to expose that cunt. You don't know anything about what Kings put in and until you do, you should just let it go.
  13. He's obviously the leader of the group who are our board. He's the chairman so he must have the money. You actually think Paul Murray is the one with the money? Loooool. So you think a man who has no money, comes and goes when he pleases back and forth to South Africa was nominated chairman of the board by other members all this and he isn't the cunt with the money?
  14. Quote me correctly.i said between 5 and 10 million. Prove to me he hasn't put in money at all.
  15. Well, take into account last year losses this years losses. His shareholding and paying back Ashley loan. I know he didn't fork all that out hinself but hr must have spent at least over 5 to 10 million. But nobody knows.
×
×
  • Create New...