ItsRangersForMe

And scoring about 250 goals.

Fair point Bad Robot but I would be interested to know when the SFA changed this and what reasons they have given. The obvious conclusion is that they can see possible cases arising in the near future and don't want to be forced into having to take legal action. Maybe they have decided that issues such as this should be taken up by the police and not by the football authorities, but would still be interesting to see who was involved in the decision to make the change at a time when Ceptic and Hibs could potentially fall foul of the rule.

DK lookalike.

When I think of the best headed goals this one from big DJ is always the first one that comes to mind. About 14 yards out but no sign of ball dropping before it hits the net. Great timing and power to beat an international keeper with a header from that distance.

Alex Salmond and many of his SNP cronies understand how a UK wide broadcasting company helps to unite the people of the UK and they intended to start prising it apart if they had the powers. Just feel that demonising the BBC as a whole could end up weakening the interests of the PUL community in the long run.

I agree that BBC Scotland's treatment of Rangers has been a disgrace for a number of years now but we need to differentiate between BBC Scotland and the rest of the BBC. The BBC as a whole is one of the remaining pillars that helps to keep Britain together so we should be doing everything we can to deal with the biased individuals at the BBC rather than condemning the BBC as a whole. It's in our interests to keep the BBC strong.

If the worst outcome does happen I would hope that the Rangers songs would be blaring through the speakers until all Ceptic fans have left the stadium. Rangers need to do everything they can to make sure they don't enjoy coming to Ibrox.

Repeating the line from the song over and over again to drown them out should do the trick 54 titles we're still going strong 54 titles we're still going strong ........

Good passer, good going forward, should also improve our dead ball options. Still a question mark over him defensively although hopefully Murty can improve the cover around him by playing McCorie beside him. Against Hibs he let McGinn go past him and score. In the second half against Hibs he also gave a Hibs player a free header around the penalty spot which they should have scored with to make it 0-2. Agree that he's done well and been a good signing so far but need to see how he performs against the top teams before attempting anything permanent.

Agree that hibs won the midfield battle in the first half leading to us looking wide open numerous times down our left side. Having said that, Rangers had more of what I would call chances in first half so we could have been winning. Rangers controlled most of second half so Murty and the team must have changed something even if subs didn't come on until later. Aimless crosses and bad delivery in the final third was the main issue in the second half. I reckon Rangers would have gone on to win the game if it wasn't for a stupid challenge by Tav.

Good to watch, and further proof that Ceptic didn't invent the huddle. And I thought that people had never stood in a circle with their arms around each other until Ceptic invented it a few years ago. Don't remember ever hearing it at Ibrox but Blue Heaven by Fats Domino always makes me think of being at Ibrox.

After Warburton and Pedro experiments the next manager has to be a safe option. Reckon McLeish is that man although pretty sure Gus Hiddink could get us back to the top so he wouldn't be much of a gamble. At this stage in his career I would expect the Rangers job would be interesting to Hiddink. Rangers is a one of a kind club and it's just come through a situation that is unlikely to happen again so to be the manager that takes Rangers back to the top is a one-off opportunity that might interest Hiddink.

If some totally independent body had decided on Rangers punishment then it would be understandable for Ceptic to say they have won the title fair and square over the last few years, but in reality they were heavily involved in influencing what Rangers punishment was. Conflict of interest doesn't quite cover it. It was a clear attempt by their club to maximise the benefits they could get out of Rangers problems. That's why there's no doubt to me that the titles are tainted. While the fans need to keep promoting the tainted titles argument, I agree with an earlier poster that the main focus needs to be on stopping them getting more.

Shocked at how one sided that German documentary is. Definite propaganda win for them and looked like a deliberate tactic by the film maker. Rangers talking about business and making money versus Desmond White talking about them doing a lot for charity (they are never shy about mentioning how much they do for charity - would be good to see the figures). Even the clips of the game mainly showed Rangers putting in hard tackles on Ceptic players. Also didn't realise how anti-rangers Cliff Hanley was. And to finish the documentary making Waddell look like a numpty - when you think of the foresight and input he eventually had in redeveloping Ibrox.

I agree with you Ronnie that the enemy don't seem to realise where this could end up and it is creating a poisonous atmosphere. Even if you're not up for the fight just keep going to games and supporting the club. We can't afford to lose support.