-
Posts
8,482 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
2
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Downloads
Posts posted by backup
-
-
-
2 minutes ago, Junior Soprano said:
Aye but I’d still rather have Kent tbh.
Too late, looks like Leeds !
-
Wrong thread
-
The pissing on us from a great height started the day minty borrowed the money from masterton to take the keys of Ibrox,, that anyone is still surprised, is the biggest surprise of all.
-
42 minutes ago, NornIronBear said:
Until Rangers gets of it's arse and employs a proper PR strategy the attacks will continue and increase.
The board are only interested when it's one of them that's targeted. Are Rangers blind to the fact the press and the snp are setting them up as the target for point deductions and stand closures?
Our board has two open goals to shoot at involving sporting integrity sceptic, that they refuse to do so is a bigger mystery than the meaning of life.
- Blumhoilann, HG5, NornIronBear and 1 other
- 4
-
2 hours ago, TMB said:
We do need Kent back
The way some chaps go on about kent he must be a one man team.
-
18 minutes ago, govanblue said:
a remember when wummin had a day oot at the steamie, aye great days then and the beer wizny like a chemical bath 😏
-
-
6 minutes ago, Sweettartangirl said:
Get a grip. Typical that you would be the one "backing up" idiots and passing them off as okay to do Rangers over.
No idea why I actually even reply to you, but it certainly won't be happening again. Like that absolute walloper BP9, you're now on ignore as well.
Have a marvellous day. Take your sarcastic comments and ram it.
thank you for a reasonless reply....equality has a lot to answer for...🤗🤗🤗😏
-
-
27 minutes ago, Sweettartangirl said:
he is still a wanker
if that’s your best shot 😂
-
5 hours ago, Sweettartangirl said:
Mike Ashley or what he has done.
What has he done that he can be charged/prosecuted for, apart from being a shrewd business chap.
No one need look any further than the mint, who tossed us aside like a £1 rag.....or slippery the contract breaker, for the valid reasons to our present impasse.
-
25 minutes ago, bluebovril said:
How many does it hold mate
250 👍
-
A useful asset for the Academy.
New Academy Stand Opens - Rangers Football Club, Official Website
https://Rangers.co.uk/news/academy-news/new-academy-stand-opens/
- WATP-FOREVER and Amokachi
- 2
-
-
Security "consultant".
-
9 minutes ago, Moody Blue Legend said:
The ball was a floater.
right up there with the grass was too long/short/ wrong direction/wrong colour....,.
-
-
-
jamie currie takes the rhebel's filthy lucre, or maybe it is for free ?
-
Only if you have never heard of Jim Baxter, there are others.
-
From figures it would appear the demise of mines was more than double the tory total, under labour.
Then there is the charge that it was Margaret Thatcher who "destroyed" the coal mines and the mining communities. How many times have the BBC broadcast that claim without refutation? Yet the facts show that far more coal mines closed under the Labour Prime Ministers Harold Wilson and James Callaghan.
These are the figures for the sharply declining number of coal mines open each year under those Labour Governments.
1964 545
1965 .. 504
1966 .. 442
1967 .. 406
1968 .. 330
1969 .. 304
1974 .. 250
1975 .. 241
1976 .. 239
1977 .. 231
1978 .. 223
1979 .. 219These are the figures for the Thatcher years:
1979 .. 219
1980 .. 213
1981 .. 200
1982 .. 191
1983 .. 170
1984 .. 169
1985 .. 133
1986 .. 110
1987 .. 94
1988 .. 86
1989 .. 73
1990 .. 65The Lord Palmerston blog says:
It was the ever-erudite @allanholloway who brought to my attention a few weeks back that more coal mines closed under Harold Wilson’s governments than under Margaret Thatcher’s, and I owe him an apology for not having credited him sooner, given the number of retweets I got for passing that on earlier. Based on these figures from the government about 290 mines closed under Wilson in all his time in office, and about 160 under Thatcher. Because the figures are based on year end totals of pits operating, it’s not possible to be precise, but the relative scale of those numbers is clear. So why isn’t Wilson execrated by the Left for his part in the decline of coal mining?
That is a fair question. Do the Left seriously claim that Harold Wilson was accepting economic realities while Margaret Thatcher was motivated by sheer spite?
-
12 minutes ago, SeparateEntityMyArse said:
So are we filing this under a scum bam up, a hoax, a photoshop for a laugh etc and there was never any club call to the papers / lawyers etc?
Correct.
-
33 minutes ago, ForeverAndEver said:
You do realise he hasn’t said that, that is the front page eh?
Page nine allegedly. chap on FF said he had one of the 300 editions in circulation, again allegedly, but couldn't supply any pics as it was a matter of confidentiality, or such.
We're going to win the league
in Jimmy Bell's Kitroom
Posted
😱😂😂😂