Jump to content

backup

First Team
  • Content Count

    8,482
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

Reputation Activity

  1. dougie76 liked a post in a topic by backup in it's a miracle   
    😂

    WhatsApp Video 2019-05-15 at 21.10.55.mp4
  2. Bobby Hume liked a post in a topic by backup in Rangers statement r.e. Flanagan Citation   
    The board need to start standing up for players and fans, full stop.
    Words are just that, actions speak louder than words.
  3. SonOfLuther liked a post in a topic by backup in it's a miracle   
    😂

    WhatsApp Video 2019-05-15 at 21.10.55.mp4
  4. Courtyard Bear liked a post in a topic by backup in Rangers statement r.e. Flanagan Citation   
    There was a saying that decisions evened themselves out over a season, Wattie quoted it often, how we doing with the evening out with this new fangled system, we aren't !
  5. backup liked a post in a topic by eejay the dj in Rangers statement r.e. Flanagan Citation   
    If our club let this go . We will get it both barrels next season . Count on it
  6. backup liked a post in a topic by Dave Hedgehog in Rangers statement r.e. Flanagan Citation   
    Flanagan is citied and it appears on the SFA disciplinary updates page on their website.
    Rangers ask why Flanagan is being citied after being dealt with by the ref but Simunovic isn’t despite it being missed by the officials.
    The SFA then say Simunovic was citied but the panel couldn’t agree to ban him.
    That is bullshit. If he had been citied it would have appeared as a charge on their disciplinary updates. It didn’t.
    They are now lying to cover their tracks. Corrupt to the core.
  7. Bears r us liked a post in a topic by backup in Rangers statement r.e. Flanagan Citation   
    "but that sending off offence was not seen by any of the match officials at the time that it was committed"
    Clancy saw a yellow card offence, the co referred it to the panel, she must be asked by our board why suminovic was also not referred.
  8. backup liked a post in a topic by siddiqi_drinker in Rangers statement r.e. Flanagan Citation   
    Other countries are using VAR and goal-line technology to SUPPORT the match officials -- in Scotland, we have some wee woman lawyer overruling match officials game decisions. 
    Ref saw the incident and made a decision - should be the end of the story. 
  9. 16BlueSherbert90 liked a post in a topic by backup in Rangers statement r.e. Flanagan Citation   
    The board need to start standing up for players and fans, full stop.
    Words are just that, actions speak louder than words.
  10. Blumhoilann liked a post in a topic by backup in Rangers statement r.e. Flanagan Citation   
    "but that sending off offence was not seen by any of the match officials at the time that it was committed"
    Clancy saw a yellow card offence, the co referred it to the panel, she must be asked by our board why suminovic was also not referred.
  11. Blumhoilann liked a post in a topic by backup in Rangers statement r.e. Flanagan Citation   
    The board need to start standing up for players and fans, full stop.
    Words are just that, actions speak louder than words.
  12. backup liked a post in a topic by rabc10000 in Rangers statement r.e. Flanagan Citation   
    Yeah what I was meaning with their own verdict was ofc whether a player should have been sent of or if it was in fact a yellow etc with ot just making stuff up to suit themselves if you know what I mean? 
  13. backup liked a post in a topic by Jimbeamjunior in Rangers statement r.e. Flanagan Citation   
    She never, seemingly a panel of ex refs did and couldnt agree that it was a red card
  14. rabc10000 liked a post in a topic by backup in Rangers statement r.e. Flanagan Citation   
    They can't give their own verdict, their conclusion must be within the laws of the game, which imho means the sumnovic decision needs to be challenged under natural justice.
  15. siddiqi_drinker liked a post in a topic by backup in Jon Flanagan   
    “any official” includes linesmen
  16. Bobby Hume liked a post in a topic by backup in Jon Flanagan   
    Dignified silence is the reason they have their boots on our neck !
  17. LiverpoolBlue liked a post in a topic by backup in Jon Flanagan   
    Rangers have vowed to ‘vigorously defend’ Jon Flanagan at a Scottish FA hearing and called for ‘full transparency’ over the disciplinary process as they question why celtic defender Jozo Simunovic has escaped punishment for an alleged elbow on Jermain Defoe.
    Flanagan faces a two-match ban after being cited by Compliance Officer Clare Whyte for an incident in the Light Blues’ Old Firm win on Sunday.
    Referee Kevin Clancy booked the full-back for catching captain Scott Brown in the face as celtic prepared to take a corner in the second half of the derby clash and both Brown and boss Neil Lennon queried why Flanagan wasn’t sent off.
    But the 26-year-old now faces the prospect of a two-match suspension after being cited by Whyte and he will face a tribunal hearing on Thursday to determine whether he misses Rangers’ final Premiership match of the campaign with Kilmarnock this weekend and the first game that Steven Gerrard’s side play next term.
    Keeper Allan McGregor is already ruled out of both outings after serving the first game of a three-match ban against celtic following his red card in the victory over Hibernian at Ibrox.
    Rangers will challenge the charge against Flanagan and have also once again raised concerns over the process that sees games being ‘re-refereed’ as incidents that are highlighted in television coverage come under the microscope from Compliance Officer Whyte.
    The Light Blues have questioned why Simunovic wasn’t penalised by referee Clancy for lashing out at Defoe in the first half as the Englishman was struck in the face by an elbow from the Hoops defender.
    A club spokesperson said: “Once again, there seems intent to change the decision of a Referee in a match involving Rangers. There seems to be a steady erosion of respect for Scotland’s Referees and the authority they are meant to enjoy under Rule 5 of the Laws of the Game.
    “The decisions of Referees regarding facts connected with play are meant to be final but Referees are now routinely invited to change their decisions after a game has finished.
    “It is particularly shocking that another Rangers player has been singled out for retrospective action and issued with a notice of complaint while Jozo Simunovic, the celtic player who used an elbow to fell Jermain Defoe, has escaped any kind of censure.
    “Why did one incident escape punishment while the other is now deemed worthy of a red card? We cannot understand how these two incidents could be studied yet only one be considered worthy of punishment.
    “It seems as if Rangers’ players are being held to a different code of conduct from players at other clubs. We shall vigorously defend Mr Flanagan and have also asked for full transparency on what matters are brought forward for retrospective action. Are those decisions being made even-handedly?”
  18. Malvern liked a post in a topic by backup in Jon Flanagan   
    Dignified silence is the reason they have their boots on our neck !
  19. Bears liked a post in a topic by backup in Jon Flanagan   
    Simunovic committed a straight assault.
  20. jintybear liked a post in a topic by backup in Jon Flanagan   
    “any official” includes linesmen
  21. jintybear liked a post in a topic by backup in Jon Flanagan   
    “Scott Brown has explained why Rangers’ Jon Flanagan avoided a red card in Sunday’s Old Firm derby, telling the Daily Record that referee Kevin Clancy did not believe the celtic skipper had been caught in the face by the defender’s arm”
     
    There is also no way the footage shows JF catching anyone in the face.
  22. BlueKnight87 liked a post in a topic by backup in Jon Flanagan   
    Rangers have vowed to ‘vigorously defend’ Jon Flanagan at a Scottish FA hearing and called for ‘full transparency’ over the disciplinary process as they question why celtic defender Jozo Simunovic has escaped punishment for an alleged elbow on Jermain Defoe.
    Flanagan faces a two-match ban after being cited by Compliance Officer Clare Whyte for an incident in the Light Blues’ Old Firm win on Sunday.
    Referee Kevin Clancy booked the full-back for catching captain Scott Brown in the face as celtic prepared to take a corner in the second half of the derby clash and both Brown and boss Neil Lennon queried why Flanagan wasn’t sent off.
    But the 26-year-old now faces the prospect of a two-match suspension after being cited by Whyte and he will face a tribunal hearing on Thursday to determine whether he misses Rangers’ final Premiership match of the campaign with Kilmarnock this weekend and the first game that Steven Gerrard’s side play next term.
    Keeper Allan McGregor is already ruled out of both outings after serving the first game of a three-match ban against celtic following his red card in the victory over Hibernian at Ibrox.
    Rangers will challenge the charge against Flanagan and have also once again raised concerns over the process that sees games being ‘re-refereed’ as incidents that are highlighted in television coverage come under the microscope from Compliance Officer Whyte.
    The Light Blues have questioned why Simunovic wasn’t penalised by referee Clancy for lashing out at Defoe in the first half as the Englishman was struck in the face by an elbow from the Hoops defender.
    A club spokesperson said: “Once again, there seems intent to change the decision of a Referee in a match involving Rangers. There seems to be a steady erosion of respect for Scotland’s Referees and the authority they are meant to enjoy under Rule 5 of the Laws of the Game.
    “The decisions of Referees regarding facts connected with play are meant to be final but Referees are now routinely invited to change their decisions after a game has finished.
    “It is particularly shocking that another Rangers player has been singled out for retrospective action and issued with a notice of complaint while Jozo Simunovic, the celtic player who used an elbow to fell Jermain Defoe, has escaped any kind of censure.
    “Why did one incident escape punishment while the other is now deemed worthy of a red card? We cannot understand how these two incidents could be studied yet only one be considered worthy of punishment.
    “It seems as if Rangers’ players are being held to a different code of conduct from players at other clubs. We shall vigorously defend Mr Flanagan and have also asked for full transparency on what matters are brought forward for retrospective action. Are those decisions being made even-handedly?”
  23. Bears r us liked a post in a topic by backup in Jon Flanagan   
    Dignified silence is the reason they have their boots on our neck !
  24. thehost liked a post in a topic by backup in Jon Flanagan   
    Dignified silence is the reason they have their boots on our neck !
  25. surfsup2 liked a post in a topic by backup in Jon Flanagan   
    Dignified silence is the reason they have their boots on our neck !
×
×
  • Create New...