Youllneverwinaway 0 Posted May 7, 2009 Author Share Posted May 7, 2009 pretty surprising stats, though i'm guessing he's scored a few coming of the bench Of the 101 goals for Rangers, only 7 have been scored after coming on as a substitute. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Youllneverwinaway 0 Posted May 7, 2009 Author Share Posted May 7, 2009 What's his scoring stats against the team that finishes top (or second)? The old firm are by far and away the best teams in the coutry and that's where he should really be measured. He has played a total of 376 minutes against Timmy and scored once. Whilst that is way out of line with the rest of his stats, and despite me being undecided on him cause of his attitude, i dont think you can say thats the only team he can be judged against mate Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Davemac 18 Posted May 7, 2009 Share Posted May 7, 2009 Let's be honest is he good enough when we have our backs to the wall. Scottish football only really has 2 hard games Sheep away how many has he scored there and against THEM. Whats the stats? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TunnyLoyal 1,136 Posted May 7, 2009 Share Posted May 7, 2009 'Youllneverwinaway' where do you get all your facts and figures from? You seem to be able to pull all these stats about players, refs against certain teams etc. Just curious to your source. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tumshie 205 Posted May 7, 2009 Share Posted May 7, 2009 Great rangers goalscorers have to score against Celtic and in Europe. If Boyd can do that then, and only then, can he go onto be considered one of the greats. hopefully he begins to do that against celtic on Saturday. COME ON BOYDIE Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Youllneverwinaway 0 Posted May 7, 2009 Author Share Posted May 7, 2009 'Youllneverwinaway' where do you get all your facts and figures from? You seem to be able to pull all these stats about players, refs against certain teams etc. Just curious to your source. I have 4 different sources mate. www.soccerbase.com Rangers - the complete record (book) Rangers Football companion (book) an xl spreadsheet that someone posted on here a while ago. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TunnyLoyal 1,136 Posted May 7, 2009 Share Posted May 7, 2009 'Youllneverwinaway' where do you get all your facts and figures from? You seem to be able to pull all these stats about players, refs against certain teams etc. Just curious to your source. I have 4 different sources mate. www.soccerbase.com Rangers - the complete record (book) Rangers Football companion (book) an xl spreadsheet that someone posted on here a while ago. Cheers Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
port_bear 86 Posted May 7, 2009 Share Posted May 7, 2009 What's his scoring stats against the team that finishes top (or second)? The old firm are by far and away the best teams in the coutry and that's where he should really be measured. So if Boyd's scoring record against the scum was immence yet his scoring record against the other teams in the league was very poor would that mean he is a better striker? That makes no sense Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Youllneverwinaway 0 Posted May 7, 2009 Author Share Posted May 7, 2009 What's his scoring stats against the team that finishes top (or second)? The old firm are by far and away the best teams in the coutry and that's where he should really be measured. So if Boyd's scoring record against the scum was immence yet his scoring record against the other teams in the league was very poor would that mean he is a better striker? That makes no sense Ugo Ehiogu is a better striker than Boyd......FACT... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SuperRangers 2 Posted May 7, 2009 Share Posted May 7, 2009 Am i right in saying that big Jukebox never scored against the earls ? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AGM_72 3,596 Posted May 7, 2009 Share Posted May 7, 2009 Nice stats, You'llneverwinaway. Pretty suprising ones, but certainly suprising in a good way. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
papaguy51 912 Posted May 7, 2009 Share Posted May 7, 2009 Good stats, I was surprised. Nonetheless, the only stat I'm concerned about this weekend is one goal in 18 games against Celtic. Although in saying that, I really don't give a flying fuck who scores the winner Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Emerson 2 Posted May 7, 2009 Share Posted May 7, 2009 Well none of our squad has scored against the Tims in the past 3 games so its hardly fair to point a finger at Boydys ability to do it against the 'big' teams. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Youllneverwinaway 0 Posted May 7, 2009 Author Share Posted May 7, 2009 Good stats, I was surprised. Nonetheless, the only stat I'm concerned about this weekend is one goal in 18 games against Celtic. Although in saying that, I really don't give a flying fuck who scores the winner To be fair, its only 866 minutes so in the strictest sense of the word, he has played the equivalent of less than 10 games, though 1 goal is still a poor return Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
papaguy51 912 Posted May 7, 2009 Share Posted May 7, 2009 Good stats, I was surprised. Nonetheless, the only stat I'm concerned about this weekend is one goal in 18 games against Celtic. Although in saying that, I really don't give a flying fuck who scores the winner To be fair, its only 866 minutes so in the strictest sense of the word, he has played the equivalent of less than 10 games, though 1 goal is still a poor return One goal in 9.62 (accuracy!) games is a god awful return. It must be a mental thing. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
McBoyd 355 Posted May 7, 2009 Share Posted May 7, 2009 Good stats, I was surprised. Nonetheless, the only stat I'm concerned about this weekend is one goal in 18 games against Celtic. Although in saying that, I really don't give a flying fuck who scores the winner To be fair, its only 866 minutes so in the strictest sense of the word, he has played the equivalent of less than 10 games, though 1 goal is still a poor return One goal in 9.62 (accuracy!) games is a god awful return. It must be a mental thing. 18 games against celtic? Or even your later changed 9.62 games? I thought he had played 376 minutes against timmy? At technically 90 minutes a match.. Thats 4 and a bit games? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
papaguy51 912 Posted May 7, 2009 Share Posted May 7, 2009 Good stats, I was surprised. Nonetheless, the only stat I'm concerned about this weekend is one goal in 18 games against Celtic. Although in saying that, I really don't give a flying fuck who scores the winner To be fair, its only 866 minutes so in the strictest sense of the word, he has played the equivalent of less than 10 games, though 1 goal is still a poor return One goal in 9.62 (accuracy!) games is a god awful return. It must be a mental thing. 18 games against celtic? Or even your later changed 9.62 games? I thought he had played 376 minutes against timmy? At technically 90 minutes a match.. Thats 4 and a bit games? YNWA said 866 minutes. 18 appearances, but nearly 10 'full games' if you know what I mean. Regardless of how we dress it up, it's a feckin' abysmal record and I hope to God he improves it on Saturday. I'll have a £10 on him for FGS anyway. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Youllneverwinaway 0 Posted May 7, 2009 Author Share Posted May 7, 2009 Good stats, I was surprised. Nonetheless, the only stat I'm concerned about this weekend is one goal in 18 games against Celtic. Although in saying that, I really don't give a flying fuck who scores the winner To be fair, its only 866 minutes so in the strictest sense of the word, he has played the equivalent of less than 10 games, though 1 goal is still a poor return One goal in 9.62 (accuracy!) games is a god awful return. It must be a mental thing. Not really. What a lot of people forget is that Boyd is a poacher. Nothing more. Nothing less. If he doesnt get chances, he wont make them. If the ball doesnt come in the box, he wont score them or very rarley score them. In his 9.62 games against Timmy, how many times did his team-mates put the ball in the box for him. What posession did Killie or Rangers have v Timmy as opposed to the rest of the SPL. Whilst it is my view Boyd should then work on that part of the game and improve, you cant ignore it for what it is. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
McBoyd 355 Posted May 7, 2009 Share Posted May 7, 2009 YNWA said 866 minutes. Im just going by.. He has played a total of 376 minutes against Timmy and scored once. Whilst that is way out of line with the rest of his stats, and despite me being undecided on him cause of his attitude, i dont think you can say thats the only team he can be judged against mate Or are we talking about in his career totally with Rangers and Killie? I would hardly take into effect anything at Killie, to be honest, but true, as you said he needs to do better against them, i hope him scoring this weekend will open the flood gates. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
papaguy51 912 Posted May 7, 2009 Share Posted May 7, 2009 Good stats, I was surprised. Nonetheless, the only stat I'm concerned about this weekend is one goal in 18 games against Celtic. Although in saying that, I really don't give a flying fuck who scores the winner To be fair, its only 866 minutes so in the strictest sense of the word, he has played the equivalent of less than 10 games, though 1 goal is still a poor return One goal in 9.62 (accuracy!) games is a god awful return. It must be a mental thing. Not really. What a lot of people forget is that Boyd is a poacher. Nothing more. Nothing less. If he doesnt get chances, he wont make them. If the ball doesnt come in the box, he wont score them or very rarley score them. In his 9.62 games against Timmy, how many times did his team-mates put the ball in the box for him. What posession did Killie or Rangers have v Timmy as opposed to the rest of the SPL. Whilst it is my view Boyd should then work on that part of the game and improve, you cant ignore it for what it is. I'd disagree. For Scotland's top striker to have only scored once in over 9 games against Celtic is brutal, regardless if we make it look better and stick a cherry on top. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Youllneverwinaway 0 Posted May 7, 2009 Author Share Posted May 7, 2009 Good stats, I was surprised. Nonetheless, the only stat I'm concerned about this weekend is one goal in 18 games against Celtic. Although in saying that, I really don't give a flying fuck who scores the winner To be fair, its only 866 minutes so in the strictest sense of the word, he has played the equivalent of less than 10 games, though 1 goal is still a poor return One goal in 9.62 (accuracy!) games is a god awful return. It must be a mental thing. 18 games against celtic? Or even your later changed 9.62 games? I thought he had played 376 minutes against timmy? At technically 90 minutes a match.. Thats 4 and a bit games? To clarify, the 866 minutes is with Killie and Rangers v Timmy Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
McBoyd 355 Posted May 7, 2009 Share Posted May 7, 2009 To clarify, the 866 minutes is with Killie and Rangers v Timmy Aye i just noticed that cheers. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chambo 197 Posted May 7, 2009 Share Posted May 7, 2009 Good stats, I was surprised. Nonetheless, the only stat I'm concerned about this weekend is one goal in 18 games against Celtic. Although in saying that, I really don't give a flying fuck who scores the winner To be fair, its only 866 minutes so in the strictest sense of the word, he has played the equivalent of less than 10 games, though 1 goal is still a poor return One goal in 9.62 (accuracy!) games is a god awful return. It must be a mental thing. Not really. What a lot of people forget is that Boyd is a poacher. Nothing more. Nothing less. If he doesnt get chances, he wont make them. If the ball doesnt come in the box, he wont score them or very rarley score them. In his 9.62 games against Timmy, how many times did his team-mates put the ball in the box for him. What posession did Killie or Rangers have v Timmy as opposed to the rest of the SPL. Whilst it is my view Boyd should then work on that part of the game and improve, you cant ignore it for what it is. I'd disagree. For Scotland's top striker to have only scored once in over 9 games against Celtic is brutal, regardless if we make it look better and stick a cherry on top. Mmmm, cherry!!! He does need to score more against Celtic. He quite often gets one chance against them and fluffs it. Even the one he scored rolled down his shin and Boruc dived out the way! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Youllneverwinaway 0 Posted May 7, 2009 Author Share Posted May 7, 2009 Good stats, I was surprised. Nonetheless, the only stat I'm concerned about this weekend is one goal in 18 games against Celtic. Although in saying that, I really don't give a flying fuck who scores the winner To be fair, its only 866 minutes so in the strictest sense of the word, he has played the equivalent of less than 10 games, though 1 goal is still a poor return One goal in 9.62 (accuracy!) games is a god awful return. It must be a mental thing. Not really. What a lot of people forget is that Boyd is a poacher. Nothing more. Nothing less. If he doesnt get chances, he wont make them. If the ball doesnt come in the box, he wont score them or very rarley score them. In his 9.62 games against Timmy, how many times did his team-mates put the ball in the box for him. What posession did Killie or Rangers have v Timmy as opposed to the rest of the SPL. Whilst it is my view Boyd should then work on that part of the game and improve, you cant ignore it for what it is. I'd disagree. For Scotland's top striker to have only scored once in over 9 games against Celtic is brutal, regardless if we make it look better and stick a cherry on top. Even if the majority of those games were with, what is, a bottom 6 team ? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
McBoyd 355 Posted May 7, 2009 Share Posted May 7, 2009 But saying that about Timmy, the top 6 stats have suprised me, and just goes to show that once someone on a forum says "he hardly scores against the top 6" it then goes around without anyone checking. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts