papaguy51 941 Posted July 15, 2009 Share Posted July 15, 2009 we need someone thats naturally left footed and can play on the left hand side, also with some pace .... Lovenkrands ticks all those boxes ??? Also he`s a free agent so why not ? he can't play on the left hand side and he has lost most of his pace with injuries from his time in Germany! so he doesnt tick al the boxes he can play on the left side, hes left footed! and he might not be as fast as before but he`d do a job for us I hate this "do a job" for us nonsense. He clearly can't. He was brought in for Newcastle to "do a job" and they got relegated. ye, but he still did nb for them, scored a few goals and the fans liked him Is this what Rangers have come to? Signing "not bad" players? He scored 3 goals, 2 of which came against the other relegated teams and one tap in against Man Utd. He's coming up 30, he was finished at 28. He's not as fast, can't play on the wing and can't cross. He's a useless waster. thats ur opinion mate but i just think hes ideal for us. And u cant forget rangers dont have alot of money to spend, so yes it is wat rangers have come to, rangers cant compete with the top clubs anymore wen it comes to buying players Aye you're right. Rangers don't have a lot of money to spend, so let's not waste it on wasters like Lovenkrands! well i struggle to think of any other players with the same attributes as lovenkrands that we can afford and get on a free! (apart from wages obv) Marko Pantelic. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
StevenDavis 112 Posted July 15, 2009 Share Posted July 15, 2009 we need someone thats naturally left footed and can play on the left hand side, also with some pace .... Lovenkrands ticks all those boxes ??? Also he`s a free agent so why not ? he can't play on the left hand side and he has lost most of his pace with injuries from his time in Germany! so he doesnt tick al the boxes he can play on the left side, hes left footed! and he might not be as fast as before but he`d do a job for us I hate this "do a job" for us nonsense. He clearly can't. He was brought in for Newcastle to "do a job" and they got relegated. ye, but he still did nb for them, scored a few goals and the fans liked him Is this what Rangers have come to? Signing "not bad" players? He scored 3 goals, 2 of which came against the other relegated teams and one tap in against Man Utd. He's coming up 30, he was finished at 28. He's not as fast, can't play on the wing and can't cross. He's a useless waster. thats ur opinion mate but i just think hes ideal for us. And u cant forget rangers dont have alot of money to spend, so yes it is wat rangers have come to, rangers cant compete with the top clubs anymore wen it comes to buying players Aye you're right. Rangers don't have a lot of money to spend, so let's not waste it on wasters like Lovenkrands! well i struggle to think of any other players with the same attributes as lovenkrands that we can afford and get on a free! (apart from wages obv) Marko Pantelic. Exactly the type of guy we're crying out for. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AdamVDB 0 Posted July 15, 2009 Share Posted July 15, 2009 we need someone thats naturally left footed and can play on the left hand side, also with some pace .... Lovenkrands ticks all those boxes ??? Also he`s a free agent so why not ? he can't play on the left hand side and he has lost most of his pace with injuries from his time in Germany! so he doesnt tick al the boxes he can play on the left side, hes left footed! and he might not be as fast as before but he`d do a job for us I hate this "do a job" for us nonsense. He clearly can't. He was brought in for Newcastle to "do a job" and they got relegated. ye, but he still did nb for them, scored a few goals and the fans liked him Is this what Rangers have come to? Signing "not bad" players? He scored 3 goals, 2 of which came against the other relegated teams and one tap in against Man Utd. He's coming up 30, he was finished at 28. He's not as fast, can't play on the wing and can't cross. He's a useless waster. thats ur opinion mate but i just think hes ideal for us. And u cant forget rangers dont have alot of money to spend, so yes it is wat rangers have come to, rangers cant compete with the top clubs anymore wen it comes to buying players Aye you're right. Rangers don't have a lot of money to spend, so let's not waste it on wasters like Lovenkrands! well i struggle to think of any other players with the same attributes as lovenkrands that we can afford and get on a free! (apart from wages obv) Marko Pantelic. Exactly the type of guy we're crying out for. different type of player but, hes a centre forward. I see Lovenkrands as more of a winger Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
StevenDavis 112 Posted July 15, 2009 Share Posted July 15, 2009 we need someone thats naturally left footed and can play on the left hand side, also with some pace .... Lovenkrands ticks all those boxes ??? Also he`s a free agent so why not ? he can't play on the left hand side and he has lost most of his pace with injuries from his time in Germany! so he doesnt tick al the boxes he can play on the left side, hes left footed! and he might not be as fast as before but he`d do a job for us I hate this "do a job" for us nonsense. He clearly can't. He was brought in for Newcastle to "do a job" and they got relegated. ye, but he still did nb for them, scored a few goals and the fans liked him Is this what Rangers have come to? Signing "not bad" players? He scored 3 goals, 2 of which came against the other relegated teams and one tap in against Man Utd. He's coming up 30, he was finished at 28. He's not as fast, can't play on the wing and can't cross. He's a useless waster. thats ur opinion mate but i just think hes ideal for us. And u cant forget rangers dont have alot of money to spend, so yes it is wat rangers have come to, rangers cant compete with the top clubs anymore wen it comes to buying players Aye you're right. Rangers don't have a lot of money to spend, so let's not waste it on wasters like Lovenkrands! well i struggle to think of any other players with the same attributes as lovenkrands that we can afford and get on a free! (apart from wages obv) Marko Pantelic. Exactly the type of guy we're crying out for. different type of player but, hes a centre forward. I see Lovenkrands as more of a winger What Lovenkrands have you been watching? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
papaguy51 941 Posted July 15, 2009 Share Posted July 15, 2009 we need someone thats naturally left footed and can play on the left hand side, also with some pace .... Lovenkrands ticks all those boxes ??? Also he`s a free agent so why not ? he can't play on the left hand side and he has lost most of his pace with injuries from his time in Germany! so he doesnt tick al the boxes he can play on the left side, hes left footed! and he might not be as fast as before but he`d do a job for us I hate this "do a job" for us nonsense. He clearly can't. He was brought in for Newcastle to "do a job" and they got relegated. ye, but he still did nb for them, scored a few goals and the fans liked him Is this what Rangers have come to? Signing "not bad" players? He scored 3 goals, 2 of which came against the other relegated teams and one tap in against Man Utd. He's coming up 30, he was finished at 28. He's not as fast, can't play on the wing and can't cross. He's a useless waster. thats ur opinion mate but i just think hes ideal for us. And u cant forget rangers dont have alot of money to spend, so yes it is wat rangers have come to, rangers cant compete with the top clubs anymore wen it comes to buying players Aye you're right. Rangers don't have a lot of money to spend, so let's not waste it on wasters like Lovenkrands! well i struggle to think of any other players with the same attributes as lovenkrands that we can afford and get on a free! (apart from wages obv) Marko Pantelic. Exactly the type of guy we're crying out for. different type of player but, hes a centre forward. I see Lovenkrands as more of a winger Mate, stop before you go any further. Lovenkrands was only good for us when played as a main striker, just in front of Buffel. If you think he's a better winger, I need to question what Lovenkrands you were watching! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AdamVDB 0 Posted July 15, 2009 Share Posted July 15, 2009 we need someone thats naturally left footed and can play on the left hand side, also with some pace .... Lovenkrands ticks all those boxes ??? Also he`s a free agent so why not ? he can't play on the left hand side and he has lost most of his pace with injuries from his time in Germany! so he doesnt tick al the boxes he can play on the left side, hes left footed! and he might not be as fast as before but he`d do a job for us I hate this "do a job" for us nonsense. He clearly can't. He was brought in for Newcastle to "do a job" and they got relegated. ye, but he still did nb for them, scored a few goals and the fans liked him Is this what Rangers have come to? Signing "not bad" players? He scored 3 goals, 2 of which came against the other relegated teams and one tap in against Man Utd. He's coming up 30, he was finished at 28. He's not as fast, can't play on the wing and can't cross. He's a useless waster. thats ur opinion mate but i just think hes ideal for us. And u cant forget rangers dont have alot of money to spend, so yes it is wat rangers have come to, rangers cant compete with the top clubs anymore wen it comes to buying players Aye you're right. Rangers don't have a lot of money to spend, so let's not waste it on wasters like Lovenkrands! well i struggle to think of any other players with the same attributes as lovenkrands that we can afford and get on a free! (apart from wages obv) Marko Pantelic. Exactly the type of guy we're crying out for. different type of player but, hes a centre forward. I see Lovenkrands as more of a winger Mate, stop before you go any further. Lovenkrands was only good for us when played as a main striker, just in front of Buffel. If you think he's a better winger, I need to question what Lovenkrands you were watching! he was good as a centre forward but i thought he was better on the wing during the 2002/2003 season and previous seasons Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
StevenDavis 112 Posted July 15, 2009 Share Posted July 15, 2009 we need someone thats naturally left footed and can play on the left hand side, also with some pace .... Lovenkrands ticks all those boxes ??? Also he`s a free agent so why not ? he can't play on the left hand side and he has lost most of his pace with injuries from his time in Germany! so he doesnt tick al the boxes he can play on the left side, hes left footed! and he might not be as fast as before but he`d do a job for us I hate this "do a job" for us nonsense. He clearly can't. He was brought in for Newcastle to "do a job" and they got relegated. ye, but he still did nb for them, scored a few goals and the fans liked him Is this what Rangers have come to? Signing "not bad" players? He scored 3 goals, 2 of which came against the other relegated teams and one tap in against Man Utd. He's coming up 30, he was finished at 28. He's not as fast, can't play on the wing and can't cross. He's a useless waster. thats ur opinion mate but i just think hes ideal for us. And u cant forget rangers dont have alot of money to spend, so yes it is wat rangers have come to, rangers cant compete with the top clubs anymore wen it comes to buying players Aye you're right. Rangers don't have a lot of money to spend, so let's not waste it on wasters like Lovenkrands! well i struggle to think of any other players with the same attributes as lovenkrands that we can afford and get on a free! (apart from wages obv) Marko Pantelic. Exactly the type of guy we're crying out for. different type of player but, hes a centre forward. I see Lovenkrands as more of a winger Mate, stop before you go any further. Lovenkrands was only good for us when played as a main striker, just in front of Buffel. If you think he's a better winger, I need to question what Lovenkrands you were watching! he was good as a centre forward but i thought he was better on the wing during the 2002/2003 season and previous seasons Aye, that was 6-7 years ago. It's a different Lovenkrands now! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AdamVDB 0 Posted July 15, 2009 Share Posted July 15, 2009 we need someone thats naturally left footed and can play on the left hand side, also with some pace .... Lovenkrands ticks all those boxes ??? Also he`s a free agent so why not ? he can't play on the left hand side and he has lost most of his pace with injuries from his time in Germany! so he doesnt tick al the boxes he can play on the left side, hes left footed! and he might not be as fast as before but he`d do a job for us I hate this "do a job" for us nonsense. He clearly can't. He was brought in for Newcastle to "do a job" and they got relegated. ye, but he still did nb for them, scored a few goals and the fans liked him Is this what Rangers have come to? Signing "not bad" players? He scored 3 goals, 2 of which came against the other relegated teams and one tap in against Man Utd. He's coming up 30, he was finished at 28. He's not as fast, can't play on the wing and can't cross. He's a useless waster. thats ur opinion mate but i just think hes ideal for us. And u cant forget rangers dont have alot of money to spend, so yes it is wat rangers have come to, rangers cant compete with the top clubs anymore wen it comes to buying players Aye you're right. Rangers don't have a lot of money to spend, so let's not waste it on wasters like Lovenkrands! well i struggle to think of any other players with the same attributes as lovenkrands that we can afford and get on a free! (apart from wages obv) Marko Pantelic. Exactly the type of guy we're crying out for. different type of player but, hes a centre forward. I see Lovenkrands as more of a winger Mate, stop before you go any further. Lovenkrands was only good for us when played as a main striker, just in front of Buffel. If you think he's a better winger, I need to question what Lovenkrands you were watching! he was good as a centre forward but i thought he was better on the wing during the 2002/2003 season and previous seasons Aye, that was 6-7 years ago. It's a different Lovenkrands now! ye, ino that, but in my opinion its the best rangers can get atm with the money situation were in, ino hes a bit older now and maby not as good as previously but still good enough for rangers ino u think hes shite and a waste of money and past it but i dont! end of Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
StevenDavis 112 Posted July 15, 2009 Share Posted July 15, 2009 we need someone thats naturally left footed and can play on the left hand side, also with some pace .... Lovenkrands ticks all those boxes ??? Also he`s a free agent so why not ? he can't play on the left hand side and he has lost most of his pace with injuries from his time in Germany! so he doesnt tick al the boxes he can play on the left side, hes left footed! and he might not be as fast as before but he`d do a job for us I hate this "do a job" for us nonsense. He clearly can't. He was brought in for Newcastle to "do a job" and they got relegated. ye, but he still did nb for them, scored a few goals and the fans liked him Is this what Rangers have come to? Signing "not bad" players? He scored 3 goals, 2 of which came against the other relegated teams and one tap in against Man Utd. He's coming up 30, he was finished at 28. He's not as fast, can't play on the wing and can't cross. He's a useless waster. thats ur opinion mate but i just think hes ideal for us. And u cant forget rangers dont have alot of money to spend, so yes it is wat rangers have come to, rangers cant compete with the top clubs anymore wen it comes to buying players Aye you're right. Rangers don't have a lot of money to spend, so let's not waste it on wasters like Lovenkrands! well i struggle to think of any other players with the same attributes as lovenkrands that we can afford and get on a free! (apart from wages obv) Marko Pantelic. Exactly the type of guy we're crying out for. different type of player but, hes a centre forward. I see Lovenkrands as more of a winger Mate, stop before you go any further. Lovenkrands was only good for us when played as a main striker, just in front of Buffel. If you think he's a better winger, I need to question what Lovenkrands you were watching! he was good as a centre forward but i thought he was better on the wing during the 2002/2003 season and previous seasons Aye, that was 6-7 years ago. It's a different Lovenkrands now! ye, ino that, but in my opinion its the best rangers can get atm with the money situation were in, ino hes a bit older now and maby not as good as previously but still good enough for rangers ino u think hes shite and a waste of money and past it but i dont! end of Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AdamVDB 0 Posted July 15, 2009 Share Posted July 15, 2009 we need someone thats naturally left footed and can play on the left hand side, also with some pace .... Lovenkrands ticks all those boxes ??? Also he`s a free agent so why not ? he can't play on the left hand side and he has lost most of his pace with injuries from his time in Germany! so he doesnt tick al the boxes he can play on the left side, hes left footed! and he might not be as fast as before but he`d do a job for us I hate this "do a job" for us nonsense. He clearly can't. He was brought in for Newcastle to "do a job" and they got relegated. ye, but he still did nb for them, scored a few goals and the fans liked him Is this what Rangers have come to? Signing "not bad" players? He scored 3 goals, 2 of which came against the other relegated teams and one tap in against Man Utd. He's coming up 30, he was finished at 28. He's not as fast, can't play on the wing and can't cross. He's a useless waster. thats ur opinion mate but i just think hes ideal for us. And u cant forget rangers dont have alot of money to spend, so yes it is wat rangers have come to, rangers cant compete with the top clubs anymore wen it comes to buying players Aye you're right. Rangers don't have a lot of money to spend, so let's not waste it on wasters like Lovenkrands! well i struggle to think of any other players with the same attributes as lovenkrands that we can afford and get on a free! (apart from wages obv) Marko Pantelic. Exactly the type of guy we're crying out for. different type of player but, hes a centre forward. I see Lovenkrands as more of a winger Mate, stop before you go any further. Lovenkrands was only good for us when played as a main striker, just in front of Buffel. If you think he's a better winger, I need to question what Lovenkrands you were watching! he was good as a centre forward but i thought he was better on the wing during the 2002/2003 season and previous seasons Aye, that was 6-7 years ago. It's a different Lovenkrands now! ye, ino that, but in my opinion its the best rangers can get atm with the money situation were in, ino hes a bit older now and maby not as good as previously but still good enough for rangers ino u think hes shite and a waste of money and past it but i dont! end of only being honest mate, i hate to say it but its the truth, rangers can simply not compete for the top players Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
StevenDavis 112 Posted July 15, 2009 Share Posted July 15, 2009 we need someone thats naturally left footed and can play on the left hand side, also with some pace .... Lovenkrands ticks all those boxes ??? Also he`s a free agent so why not ? he can't play on the left hand side and he has lost most of his pace with injuries from his time in Germany! so he doesnt tick al the boxes he can play on the left side, hes left footed! and he might not be as fast as before but he`d do a job for us I hate this "do a job" for us nonsense. He clearly can't. He was brought in for Newcastle to "do a job" and they got relegated. ye, but he still did nb for them, scored a few goals and the fans liked him Is this what Rangers have come to? Signing "not bad" players? He scored 3 goals, 2 of which came against the other relegated teams and one tap in against Man Utd. He's coming up 30, he was finished at 28. He's not as fast, can't play on the wing and can't cross. He's a useless waster. thats ur opinion mate but i just think hes ideal for us. And u cant forget rangers dont have alot of money to spend, so yes it is wat rangers have come to, rangers cant compete with the top clubs anymore wen it comes to buying players Aye you're right. Rangers don't have a lot of money to spend, so let's not waste it on wasters like Lovenkrands! well i struggle to think of any other players with the same attributes as lovenkrands that we can afford and get on a free! (apart from wages obv) Marko Pantelic. Exactly the type of guy we're crying out for. different type of player but, hes a centre forward. I see Lovenkrands as more of a winger Mate, stop before you go any further. Lovenkrands was only good for us when played as a main striker, just in front of Buffel. If you think he's a better winger, I need to question what Lovenkrands you were watching! he was good as a centre forward but i thought he was better on the wing during the 2002/2003 season and previous seasons Aye, that was 6-7 years ago. It's a different Lovenkrands now! ye, ino that, but in my opinion its the best rangers can get atm with the money situation were in, ino hes a bit older now and maby not as good as previously but still good enough for rangers ino u think hes shite and a waste of money and past it but i dont! end of only being honest mate, i hate to say it but its the truth, rangers can simply not compete for the top players Obviously, but we can certainly do better than Lovenkrands. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RangersJamie52 0 Posted July 15, 2009 Share Posted July 15, 2009 There are plenty of other Bosman transfers available Just because we had Lovenkrands before it makes him an easy target to sign for some fans. If Walter looked at the Bosmans available then i am 110% sure we could find a player better than Lovenkrands. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
KERRZO 5 Posted July 15, 2009 Share Posted July 15, 2009 Has Pantelic still no club? The guy was phenomenal for Hertha last season, made them tick!!! If we could get him that would be a great signing but wont happen!!! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SlimShady 1 Posted July 29, 2009 Share Posted July 29, 2009 Tbh I can't believe anyone would turn their noses up at Lovenkrands, he was decent at Newcastle and with the right guidance could regain some top form. With the way Rangers are atm I would defiantly take Lovenkrands. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
chris_glasgow 2 Posted July 29, 2009 Share Posted July 29, 2009 Tbh I can't believe anyone would turn their noses up at Lovenkrands, he was decent at Newcastle and with the right guidance could regain some top form. With the way Rangers are atm I would defiantly take Lovenkrands. he has lost his main assest pace Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jimbo. 952 Posted July 29, 2009 Share Posted July 29, 2009 Tbh I can't believe anyone would turn their noses up at Lovenkrands, he was decent at Newcastle and with the right guidance could regain some top form. With the way Rangers are atm I would defiantly take Lovenkrands. A sign of defiance you say? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SlimShady 1 Posted July 30, 2009 Share Posted July 30, 2009 Tbh I can't believe anyone would turn their noses up at Lovenkrands, he was decent at Newcastle and with the right guidance could regain some top form. With the way Rangers are atm I would defiantly take Lovenkrands. A sign of defiance you say? spelt it wrong, but I think turn our noses up at a decent player who loves the club with the position we are in is a bit laughable. He hasn't lost his pace he could still skin full backs, he might be a tad slower but he was lightning quick before so he is still going to be very quick. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boab 73 Posted July 30, 2009 Share Posted July 30, 2009 Would rather see him up there than MHiller Are you fucking kidding me? Miller was one of the reason's we managed to win the league. So would I, altho he's had his injury troubles I reckon he'd be faster and a better finisher. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Orangeclement 619 Posted July 30, 2009 Share Posted July 30, 2009 lets get big Mark back i know he's a bit older and lost a bit of spring in his step but he would shite all over te defenders in the SPL and while we are at why no give gazza the number 8 shirt back i know his life has gone downhill a bit but in our current situation we are not going to get anyone better FFS. Lovenkrands was utter shite when he was here bar a goal against villareal and a couple against the filth he done fuck all , has no composure and couldnae beat a fucking crisp poke blowing in the wind . Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrT 173 Posted July 30, 2009 Share Posted July 30, 2009 lets get big Mark back i know he's a bit older and lost a bit of spring in his step but he would shite all over te defenders in the SPL and while we are at why no give gazza the number 8 shirt back i know his life has gone downhill a bit but in our current situation we are not going to get anyone better FFS. Lovenkrands was utter shite when he was here bar a goal against villareal and a couple against the filth he done fuck all , has no composure and couldnae beat a fucking crisp poke blowing in the wind . We need a winger with explosive pace and consistant PL was very on and off which was very frustrating as we knew he had the ability. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Orangeclement 619 Posted July 30, 2009 Share Posted July 30, 2009 lets get big Mark back i know he's a bit older and lost a bit of spring in his step but he would shite all over te defenders in the SPL and while we are at why no give gazza the number 8 shirt back i know his life has gone downhill a bit but in our current situation we are not going to get anyone better FFS. Lovenkrands was utter shite when he was here bar a goal against villareal and a couple against the filth he done fuck all , has no composure and couldnae beat a fucking crisp poke blowing in the wind . We need a winger with explosive pace and consistant PL was very on and off which was very frustrating as we knew he had the ability. get Brian Laudrup on the phone now !!!! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrT 173 Posted July 30, 2009 Share Posted July 30, 2009 lets get big Mark back i know he's a bit older and lost a bit of spring in his step but he would shite all over te defenders in the SPL and while we are at why no give gazza the number 8 shirt back i know his life has gone downhill a bit but in our current situation we are not going to get anyone better FFS. Lovenkrands was utter shite when he was here bar a goal against villareal and a couple against the filth he done fuck all , has no composure and couldnae beat a fucking crisp poke blowing in the wind . We need a winger with explosive pace and consistant PL was very on and off which was very frustrating as we knew he had the ability. get Brian Laudrup on the phone now !!!! I deleted his number mate Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bombaybadboy08 15,660 Posted July 30, 2009 Share Posted July 30, 2009 Lovenkrands played out of his skin when he needed a contract extension,i'm sure he would remember my voice well as he used to stand about a yard off the touchline at the Govan with his hands on his hips while the ball was in play, We would be hitting a brick wall in midfield,did he raise his hand and look for the pass or make a run?Did he fuck. One of the most frustrating players i've watched at Ibrox,Give me Adam over him on the left and we don't need him as a striker. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
El-Hadji Spit RFC 756 Posted July 30, 2009 Share Posted July 30, 2009 Get him signed! would add width to a very narrow team. He would want to prove any doubters wrong and whilst lost perhaps a little (if any) of his pace the boy is capable of turning a game, the quality that Hutton had, and we'd all take him back??!!! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amac9 2,060 Posted July 30, 2009 Share Posted July 30, 2009 Peter Lovenkrands is a shitebag! Keep him away from Ibrox. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts