Stardog 11 Posted September 1, 2009 Share Posted September 1, 2009 How the hell can't we get players like this? 25 years old and would sell for at least that much later... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scott-RFC 308 Posted September 1, 2009 Share Posted September 1, 2009 We dont have 2.5m Who the fuck is running Portsmouth Making Bain look like Sir Al Sugar Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillyBoy11 63 Posted September 1, 2009 Share Posted September 1, 2009 its because hes out of contract at the end of the season and he stated he wasnt staying on. But 2.5m is a crazy price Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueSuedeSambas 53,754 Posted September 1, 2009 Share Posted September 1, 2009 Fantastic player. If Spurs can add Petrov too (although it's looking unlikely now) then I think they will break the top four this season. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amac9 2,060 Posted September 1, 2009 Share Posted September 1, 2009 £2.5m for Niko Kranjcar = Bargain of the summer IMO! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
trueblue1872 2 Posted September 1, 2009 Share Posted September 1, 2009 It's not the amount of cash he goes for it's the fucking wages he'll be on.... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Davy 68 Posted September 1, 2009 Share Posted September 1, 2009 How the hell can't we get players like this? 25 years old and would sell for at least that much later... He'll probably command that fee per year in wages, we can't afford that. Having said that, it is a great piece of business by Spurs. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yoghurto 9 Posted September 1, 2009 Share Posted September 1, 2009 I've heard it's 2.5m plus the 4m that Spurs are owed from the Prince-Boateng deal. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
disgruntled_bear 157 Posted September 1, 2009 Share Posted September 1, 2009 Great signing for Tottenham Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
papaguy51 912 Posted September 1, 2009 Share Posted September 1, 2009 That's it confirmed. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SpursGer 0 Posted September 1, 2009 Share Posted September 1, 2009 I've heard it's 2.5m plus the 4m that Spurs are owed from the Prince-Boateng deal. Very much doubt it, to be honest fella. Can't see Levy sanctioning £6.5m for a player with less than 12 months on his contact. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BryanRfc 1 Posted September 1, 2009 Share Posted September 1, 2009 BARGAIN Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yoghurto 9 Posted September 1, 2009 Share Posted September 1, 2009 I've heard it's 2.5m plus the 4m that Spurs are owed from the Prince-Boateng deal. Very much doubt it, to be honest fella. Can't see Levy sanctioning £6.5m for a player with less than 12 months on his contact. Well maybe not the whole 4m, but a part of it surely. I just can't see Portsmouth letting him go for so little, considering they probably got more for Distin, who was in the same position. And isn't this the same Levy that sanctioned a 16m move for Darren Bent? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
papaguy51 912 Posted September 1, 2009 Share Posted September 1, 2009 I hope this makes people realise (especially the "£4m or no deal for Boyd" crew) how much effect a contract with under a year left has on transfer value. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Goianegra 4,680 Posted September 1, 2009 Share Posted September 1, 2009 Portsmouth are fucked. You can't sell your top (what) 5 players and almost sell Englands number 1 keeper and not sign anyone. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SpursGer 0 Posted September 1, 2009 Share Posted September 1, 2009 I've heard it's 2.5m plus the 4m that Spurs are owed from the Prince-Boateng deal. Very much doubt it, to be honest fella. Can't see Levy sanctioning £6.5m for a player with less than 12 months on his contact. Well maybe not the whole 4m, but a part of it surely. I just can't see Portsmouth letting him go for so little, considering they probably got more for Distin, who was in the same position. And isn't this the same Levy that sanctioned a 16m move for Darren Bent? The only 'extra' I know about involving the KPB deal was that they get O'Hara on loan too. Charlton needed the money quick, so we settled the fee at £12m - we then sold him for a fee that could rise to £16.5m Levy's God Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BluenoseGaz 27 Posted September 1, 2009 Share Posted September 1, 2009 They signed kranjcar because David Bentley is on his way out to man city Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SpursGer 0 Posted September 1, 2009 Share Posted September 1, 2009 They signed kranjcar because David Bentley is on his way out to man city He's not going to City. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike Newells Sexist Army 2 Posted September 1, 2009 Share Posted September 1, 2009 Portsmouth are fucked. You can't sell your top (what) 5 players and almost sell Englands number 1 keeper and not sign anyone. Nugent away to Burnley as well, i know he's rubbish but it leaves them with bugger all options. They are well and truly fucked. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mac444 6 Posted September 1, 2009 Share Posted September 1, 2009 Portsmouth are fucked. You can't sell your top (what) 5 players and almost sell Englands number 1 keeper and not sign anyone. Nugent away to Burnley as well, i know he's rubbish but it leaves them with bugger all options. They are well and truly fucked. They signed 13 players, thats hardly nobody! http://www.skysports.com/football/transfer...0_11674,00.html Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BluenoseGaz 27 Posted September 1, 2009 Share Posted September 1, 2009 They signed kranjcar because David Bentley is on his way out to man city The window is closed...nobody is going anywhere. On SSN about half 12 it said man city were linked with him Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mac444 6 Posted September 1, 2009 Share Posted September 1, 2009 They signed kranjcar because David Bentley is on his way out to man city The window is closed...nobody is going anywhere. On SSN about half 12 it said man city were linked with him Man City pulled out of the deal around 4. Kranjcar is more to replace Modric whos injured (Broke his leg IIRC) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueSuedeSambas 53,754 Posted September 1, 2009 Share Posted September 1, 2009 I don't think Portsmouth have signed enough good players to stay up. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
papaguy51 912 Posted September 1, 2009 Share Posted September 1, 2009 Pompey have also let go of Nugent to Burnley for six months (I think). Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Davy 68 Posted September 1, 2009 Share Posted September 1, 2009 I don't think Portsmouth have signed enough good players to stay up. Nor do I. They're odds on to go down with every bookies. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts