pessimistic_pete 2 Posted September 27, 2009 Share Posted September 27, 2009 i think in january we should look at the possibility of bringing him back if there is a clause in the contract...if he keeps up the form he is showing now then i would like to see him back to replace davie weir who at the moment is looking his age, give boogie and webster half a season to get to know each other and then next season we'll have a solid partnership. i know about 98% of folk may not agree so i have my tin hat on.. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
steviedavis7 0 Posted September 27, 2009 Share Posted September 27, 2009 i think in january we should look at the posibility of brining him back if there is a clause in the contract...if he keeps up the form he is showing now then i would like to see him back to replace davie weir who at the moment is looking his age, give boogie and webster half a season to get to know each other and then next season we'll have a solid partnership. i know about 98% of folk may not agree so i have my tin hat on.. i think if webster keeps playing the way he is he will be the perfect replacement for davie when he retires in the summer Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
djgazbcm 55 Posted September 27, 2009 Share Posted September 27, 2009 i think in january we should look at the posibility of brining him back if there is a clause in the contract...if he keeps up the form he is showing now then i would like to see him back to replace davie weir who at the moment is looking his age, give boogie and webster half a season to get to know each other and then next season we'll have a solid partnership. i know about 98% of folk may not agree so i have my tin hat on.. well you obviously know the drill mate on here,,look on steviedavis7 newbie,cause the lambasters will get into this growling ffs,but PP i agree, although webster never really excelled in the reserves ,but he is a CH of which we cant afford and have none,and why smith loaned him out is a fucking mystery smiths fault again i would say.. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluenoz 32,915 Posted September 28, 2009 Share Posted September 28, 2009 since it appears that Danny Wilson is not going to feature. Webster should never have been shipped out. A much better option than big Lee and we could have used him of late. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scott-RFC 308 Posted September 28, 2009 Share Posted September 28, 2009 I prefer the Rosie thread Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NOLUWDC 1 Posted September 28, 2009 Share Posted September 28, 2009 Never thought I'd say it but we could do with him the now. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MasterD 7,469 Posted September 28, 2009 Share Posted September 28, 2009 Shoulda sent Danny Wilson on loan since he's not gona be getting games, then Webster coulda played against the poorer teams and cup games 2 get fitness and replace Weir by January Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tommy WATP 86 Posted September 28, 2009 Share Posted September 28, 2009 I dont think we can recall him but it certainly would make sense to bring him back, especailly as Bougherra will be at the Africa nations cup Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Muff 245 Posted September 28, 2009 Share Posted September 28, 2009 We can't recall him in January. He should have been sent out on loan, as he was getting nowhere at Rangers. He leaves for Dundee United, no injuries after 7 games....I wonder what their training methods involve? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Creampuff 22,630 Posted September 28, 2009 Share Posted September 28, 2009 I don't rememeber there being a Webster recall clause.. Anyway, he had to be farmed out because we couldn't let him in our team without him playing games first. IMO Andy Webster will never play for Rangers again. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Poetry_In_Blue 1,043 Posted September 28, 2009 Share Posted September 28, 2009 I think the loan deal should have only been to January and not the whole season, I've always felt that a fit Webster would be a good long term replacement to Weir, but if the reports are true in the papers then that's going to be Kirk Broadfoot's role. I do wonder though will that also include the Captain's Armband? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Muff 245 Posted September 28, 2009 Share Posted September 28, 2009 No contracts should be given out until the future of the club is decided - the chairman and management teams plans.... If Kirk Broadfoot is David Weir's replacement then we are in a complete and utter mess. Craig Levein wanted a loan signing, another CB, he got Andy Webster, and I'm sure he was only going to take him if it was on a season long loan. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
outlaw69uk 123 Posted September 28, 2009 Share Posted September 28, 2009 We can't recall him in January. He should have been sent out on loan, as he was getting nowhere at Rangers. He leaves for Dundee United, no injuries after 7 games....I wonder what their training methods involve? As I mentioned in a post today, along with the hibs youth set up, Levein made it clear at the start of the season, that, their youth setup and training was being geared towards technique over everything else. (did we not touch on that in the miller thread? haha) Seems to be the case, Webster has gone there and is seemingly displaying the form he had when he came through at Hearts, which is the player we thought we had bought Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts