Novo

[MasterD 7,457]

He is the lowest paid first team squad member at the club.

We are hardly pissing away money on him if you ask me.

lower than Broadfoot? :mellow:

[Blueminawful 0]

I would keep him, not for football reasons though!!

So you would just keep him at Rangers to annoy THEM ?, very stupid reason to keep a player.

Yes, that's right I fckn love the wee man and they way he annoys the t*rriers!! And if we need a late goal no cnt will try harder than Novo, and he's paid literally fck all.

But I suppose you'd rather let him go and keep that streak of piss Lafferty.....

[Poetry_In_Blue 1,043]

I find it amusing how people assume that they know how much a player's wage is without any hard evidence.

[nachonovo=legend 0]

what is happenin with novo? is he goin 2 stay? has he defo been offered a new deal at the club????

[nachonovo=legend 0]

what is happenin with novo? is he goin 2 stay? has he defo been offered a new deal at the club????

[The Hammer 11 2,860]

Don't want novo to go grew up with him being in the rangers team and can remember when the wee man signed hard to think if him leaving

[papaguy51 941]

This 'lowest' paid thing - I don't buy it.

He won't be on much, but I think he'd be earning more than Papac, Whittaker, Broadfoot etc.

[ChampionsAgain 1,373]

we should keep him ! wide players are a must

[Ben10 2,309]

Either way, think it might be time for the wee man to move on. Everytime I see him play he just isnt cutting it.

If we are looking to get rid in the summer, Novo should be one of them, all be it there are plenty ahead of him!

Compared to the money we spent on Novo compared to the money spent on Naismith, Novo was ten times the signing that useless cunt ever will be. He should feel perplexed that naismith started ahead of him on tuesday.

[gandhisflip 5]

Either way, think it might be time for the wee man to move on. Everytime I see him play he just isnt cutting it.

If we are looking to get rid in the summer, Novo should be one of them, all be it there are plenty ahead of him!

Compared to the money we spent on Novo compared to the money spent on Naismith, Novo was ten times the signing that useless cunt ever will be. He should feel perplexed that naismith started ahead of him on tuesday.

Nacho scored 25 goals for us in his first season when played up front as a striker. He regularly turns games for us and given he's supposedly one of our lower earners i think it's crazy not to keep him.

[mmrfc1873 48]

I would keep him, not for football reasons though!!

So you would just keep him at Rangers to annoy THEM ?, very stupid reason to keep a player.

Yes, that's right I fckn love the wee man and they way he annoys the t*rriers!! And if we need a late goal no cnt will try harder than Novo, and he's paid literally fck all.

But I suppose you'd rather let him go and keep that streak of piss Lafferty.....

Why mention Kyle Lafferty in a Nacho Novo thread ?, I'm not one of his biggest fans and I would punt him this summer if I had the chance, like yourself. You made you're first comment out as if you would only have him there to annoy everybody and not play him what so ever.

[abblue 0]

would be sad to see the wee man go