Jump to content

Jelavic


Dan Deacon

Recommended Posts

Are you for real? Giving me negative feedback for saying he wouldn't have started? Get a life you sad cunt

If this is to me mate you are pointing the finger at the wrong place. I havent given anyone positive or negative feedback since the weekend and it was just after finding out what it was. I think its a pointless feature so dont use it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

aye hod oan and we will spend 4m on a class act and no play him!! :lol:

doh

So you think that we would be playing 5-3-2 if Jelavic was eligible? Or that Miller would be dropped?

Nonsense on both counts imo. We could take Miller off after 60-65 minutes right enough, or have the option not to play him if he wasn't fully fit, but no way would he not start if he was 100% fit

Link to post
Share on other sites

So you think that we would be playing 5-3-2 if Jelavic was eligible? Or that Miller would be dropped?

Nonsense on both counts imo. We could take Miller off after 60-65 minutes right enough, or have the option not to play him if he wasn't fully fit, but no way would he not start if he was 100% fit

I don't do this a lot, but I agree with Flecky on this

We spent £4m on Nikica Jelavic, the biggest amount of money we've paid for a player since we bought Mikel Arteta, I'm quite sure Jelavic would have played

Link to post
Share on other sites

So you think that we would be playing 5-3-2 if Jelavic was eligible? Or that Miller would be dropped?

Nonsense on both counts imo. We could take Miller off after 60-65 minutes right enough, or have the option not to play him if he wasn't fully fit, but no way would he not start if he was 100% fit

no idea what walter would have done but my money is on him playing nika!

(tu)

Link to post
Share on other sites

From what iv seen id say Jelavic is a better finisher than Miller, but that doesn't mean he would have taken they chances either, Miller makes intelligent runs that Jelavic might not have made, even the best players in the world miss good chances and i hope we get right behind Miller at the weekend and he proves his worth once again

Link to post
Share on other sites

From what iv seen id say Jelavic is a better finisher than Miller, but that doesn't mean he would have taken they chances either, Miller makes intelligent runs that Jelavic might not have made, even the best players in the world miss good chances and i hope we get right behind Miller at the weekend and he proves his worth once again

Fair enough, Miller does make excellent runs, however, other than that, he's not really suited to being the leader of the line, Jelavic, like Cousin and Darceville before him, possesses the attributes to be a excellent lone striker, strength in the air and being able to hold the ball also helps his case, I'm not saying Miller is bad, far from it, I think Miller is a excellent player and very important for us, but I do think Jelavic should be the lone striker in europe, sadly we don't get that choice, so we use the next best person - Miller

Link to post
Share on other sites

Jelavic would be, imo much better up front alone than Miller, he has It all - big, strong, skillfull, pacy and can finish well. He would have started instead of miller

I think that's the most likely outcome - that extra tiny slice of composure that comes with the better players is all that separated us from a truly memorable victory tonight. If I had to choose between Miller or Jela , I think Jela offers more than Miller can tbh.

it's great we have the problem!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...