djbroxybear 660 Posted October 25, 2010 Share Posted October 25, 2010 By the SFA, so there he puts his knee into Shaggers Face so thats ok to do that???What the Fuck rules for one and not the other.. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GeneralCartmanLee 313 Posted October 25, 2010 Share Posted October 25, 2010 Who has said he won't be punished ? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Poetry_In_Blue 1,043 Posted October 25, 2010 Share Posted October 25, 2010 Who has said he won't be punished ?Beat me to the question. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amac9 2,060 Posted October 25, 2010 Share Posted October 25, 2010 Won't be surprised if this is the case. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ibrox53 0 Posted October 25, 2010 Share Posted October 25, 2010 it was on sky sports news he wont face any action Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Poetry_In_Blue 1,043 Posted October 25, 2010 Share Posted October 25, 2010 it was on sky sports news he wont face any actionCheers, typical. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GeneralCartmanLee 313 Posted October 25, 2010 Share Posted October 25, 2010 disgrace if true...... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ibrox53 0 Posted October 25, 2010 Share Posted October 25, 2010 just shows who the sfa supports its a disgrace Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adoniram 1,919 Posted October 25, 2010 Share Posted October 25, 2010 BP9 will be along soon to tell us we are paranoid though Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
djbroxybear 660 Posted October 25, 2010 Author Share Posted October 25, 2010 Beat me to the question.On SSN SFA will not be taking any action against the Tranny , so when you put your knee into someones face theres no intent what a joke. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gunslinger 270 Posted October 25, 2010 Share Posted October 25, 2010 in fairness i doubt he will ever play football again after the way he played yesterday thats qite a punishment. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
johanhentze 14,073 Posted October 25, 2010 Share Posted October 25, 2010 Unbelievable! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
dummiesoot 16,003 Posted October 25, 2010 Share Posted October 25, 2010 Lennon thought he plAyed well so we'll the tranny again at Ibrox. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
delamonty 992 Posted October 25, 2010 Share Posted October 25, 2010 Ah well. That keeps him in their team. That's actually a better result!But the double standards here are shocking. If retrospective punishment is to be the norm, then it has to include 'tackles' like Black, Stokes et al. The ban on Allan was simply put, ridiculous. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
StublueKPL 524 Posted October 25, 2010 Share Posted October 25, 2010 TBH i wouldnt want action against him if things were even. its a mans game FFS. The problem we have is that our guys take "the derry" for shit so why shouldnt they Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gunslinger 270 Posted October 25, 2010 Share Posted October 25, 2010 what he did he did to get greigsy sent offnot to hurt him. he should be punished for that same as lafferty was. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amac9 2,060 Posted October 25, 2010 Share Posted October 25, 2010 Fuck the SFA! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
laudrupno1 3,932 Posted October 25, 2010 Share Posted October 25, 2010 Fuck the SFA!took the words rite outta my mouth Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
1st_Jan_1994 4,868 Posted October 25, 2010 Share Posted October 25, 2010 In an ideal world, we shouldn't need to call for him to be punished, but we want parity and for things to be fair. That's why we need to demand action, even if it makes us sound mopey. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
DarcheVinny 1,003 Posted October 25, 2010 Share Posted October 25, 2010 How on earth can they not take action after banning mcgregor. Mcgregor did not land his intended kick and got banned. The tranny went out of his way to make contact with mcgregors head, using his knee. How does that make any sense? Surely Bain and Walter will be asking why there will be no action?I have been trying to not let myself get sucked in to the double standards stuff but this is too far. We aren't being paranoid by saying the SFA prefer evil to ourselves. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChrisVanDarche 23 Posted October 25, 2010 Share Posted October 25, 2010 The leniency of the SFA towards Celtic is nothing short of disgraceful - the integrity of the league we play in is non-existent. They pander to keep the tims happy. Supposedly Broadfoot will face action for his "dive", and yet Loovens assaults 2 players right infront of the ref and will get away with it, Stokes makes a potentially career threatening tackle on Papac and gets away with it, and Samaras intentionally knees McGregor in the head and gets away with it?This is the time for Bain and co to come out and defend the club, and expose the SFA for what they are - a sham. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clemdog 39,389 Posted October 25, 2010 Share Posted October 25, 2010 Another case of pish refereeing by Collum ! Firstly was his tackle on Bougherra were he took nothing but the man. Then he just went and fucking kicked Naismith. Then this, his knee to McGregor.What warrants a sending off in a game now? Collum was such a shitebag yesterday, he just decided to ignore clear bookings and red cards because he didn't want a backlash from the Celtic fans. Then after the game all the pundits said he had a good game, he was horribly inconsistent. Utter Bottle merchant, something you can't be when your refereeing big games. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
djbroxybear 660 Posted October 25, 2010 Author Share Posted October 25, 2010 The leniency of the SFA towards Celtic is nothing short of disgraceful - the integrity of the league we play in is non-existent. They pander to keep the tims happy. Supposedly Broadfoot will face action for his "dive", and yet Loovens assaults 2 players right infront of the ref and will get away with it, Stokes makes a potentially career threatening tackle on Papac and gets away with it, and Samaras intentionally knees McGregor in the head and gets away with it?This is the time for Bain and co to come out and defend the club, and expose the SFA for what they are - a sham.Totally spot on mate... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
simon 1,741 Posted October 25, 2010 Share Posted October 25, 2010 So if you make contact with someone you won't face action? So McGregor should have kicked that Aberdeen player and he would have been OK. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
1st_Jan_1994 4,868 Posted October 25, 2010 Share Posted October 25, 2010 I don't blame the refs or linesmen for missing the Samaras knee, but again, that's why we have this retrospective punishment in place for instances such as this. Or was it only set up to punish one team? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts