1st_Jan_1994 4,868 Posted October 27, 2010 Share Posted October 27, 2010 Some really refreshing posts on this Hibs forum. Take your time and read through the 4 pages slowly. There's even a Celtic regular on there and they put him in his place.http://www.hibs.net/showthread.php?195849-Willie-Collum-threatened-by-Celtc-fans Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ClintonGrey 365 Posted October 27, 2010 Share Posted October 27, 2010 I love how that Jack guy (the Celtic fan) repeatedly calls us h*** and sectarian in the same diatribe.Delicious hypocritical irony. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Goianegra 4,647 Posted October 27, 2010 Share Posted October 27, 2010 Most of them are right about what they say - Saying Broadfoot should be ashamed and is an embarrassment is a joke though. Players will always dive, no matter what, some get away with it, some don't, but it's never usually such a huge talking point (In the last OF game, McGready got Jig sent off 'cause of a dive, never heard about that ) Didn't effect the result anyway, he sure looked guilty with those 3-1 gestures to the tims though Tims are scum, Hibs are scum, and we are top of the league! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
1st_Jan_1994 4,868 Posted October 27, 2010 Author Share Posted October 27, 2010 I don't think Broadfoot dived, but the penalty was soft and he went down easily - if that's not too much of a contradiction? I'd have rather he stayed on his feet because he had skinned the big Swede and had a clear shot at goal.We would have still won without the penalty. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jamie1807 146 Posted October 27, 2010 Share Posted October 27, 2010 I don't think Broadfoot dived, but the penalty was soft and he went down easily - if that's not too much of a contradiction? I'd have rather he stayed on his feet because he had skinned the big Swede and had a clear shot at goal.We would have still won without the penalty.He actually knocked the ball far too on, so he actually lost it Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
1st_Jan_1994 4,868 Posted October 27, 2010 Author Share Posted October 27, 2010 He actually knocked the ball far too on, so he actually lost it Did he? I'll have another look but my first thought was "yer in" Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Goianegra 4,647 Posted October 27, 2010 Share Posted October 27, 2010 I don't think Broadfoot dived, but the penalty was soft and he went down easily - if that's not too much of a contradiction? I'd have rather he stayed on his feet because he had skinned the big Swede and had a clear shot at goal.We would have still won without the penalty.That's what I'm getting at. I don't understand why after such a convincing scoreline everyone is talking about it. Fair enough if it was 0-0 in the 97th minute and there was no contact, but we got a 3-1 win in he end, and Broadfoot was kneed in the gut. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jamie1807 146 Posted October 27, 2010 Share Posted October 27, 2010 Did he? I'll have another look but my first thought was "yer in"I'm quite sure he had lost itI remember Loovens booting the ball away, although it could be a different situation all together Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
1st_Jan_1994 4,868 Posted October 27, 2010 Author Share Posted October 27, 2010 That's what I'm getting at. I don't understand why after such a convincing scoreline everyone is talking about it. Fair enough if it was 0-0 in the 97th minute and there was no contact, but we got a 3-1 win in he end, and Broadfoot was kneed in the gut.Just something for them to cling on to, really.I remembered there being no threat for the 20 odd mins at 1-1, far less at 2-1 so I don't know why Celtic they think they would have won without the Broadfoot penalty. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Goianegra 4,647 Posted October 27, 2010 Share Posted October 27, 2010 "Big baldy cunt" moves his knee towards Broadfoot. He's looking for i, but I'd say pen Either way, sick Charlie makes my day Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jamie1807 146 Posted October 27, 2010 Share Posted October 27, 2010 "Big baldy cunt" moves his knee towards Broadfoot. He's looking for i, but I'd say pen Either way, sick Charlie makes my day Nicholas say's no major incidents up until thenEmmmm Celtic should have been playing with 10 men for 88 minutes Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ClintonGrey 365 Posted October 27, 2010 Share Posted October 27, 2010 To be fair it wasn't a penalty, but do I give a fuck, not really. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ScottBogle 30 Posted October 27, 2010 Share Posted October 27, 2010 "Big baldy cunt" moves his knee towards Broadfoot. He's looking for i, but I'd say pen Either way, sick Charlie makes my day I love how Angry Charlie Gets '' DOES HE WANTY GO N ASK HIM ??!?!?! ''Fuck off Nicolas ya fenian cunt Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clemdog 39,389 Posted October 27, 2010 Share Posted October 27, 2010 Kirk did as the majority of other footballers would do, it was a soft penalty but it wasn't as if there was no contact. Though if it was given against us I'd of been pissed off.But if they want to discuss the refereeing they have to look at other decisions, on a different day one of our players would of had a broken leg. I fucking hate HIVees, but some of them make good points. I cringe when they state something the Taigs did wrong and then tar us with the same brush by saying it was the Old Firm Don't associate me with them. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
baltic_blue 108 Posted October 27, 2010 Share Posted October 27, 2010 it looks more a stone wall penalty every time i see it. Thought it was a dive at first but its a definite penalty. The baldy cunt has both hands on Broadfoot and also clips his knee. Its not even a soft penalty decision. Great refereeing. Its a well known fact that collum is a celtic fan but to be honest i didnt have any doubts that he would be fair. Can you imagine what the reaction would be from them if a ref who was a well known Rangers fan was given an old firm game to referee? There would be letters sent to every cunt demanding action. I can guarantee that they would make such a fuss that any well known Rangers supporting refs would never be allowed to referee an old firm game. Its only a matter of time before some poor cunt of a ref gets slashed in the street or worse and celtic football club should be heavily fined and threatened with a points deduction as they are making it worse. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thermopylae 15,286 Posted October 27, 2010 Share Posted October 27, 2010 I love how that Jack guy (the Celtic fan) repeatedly calls us h*** and sectarian in the same diatribe.Delicious hypocritical irony.And the sad thing is he probably doesn't even realise it Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pete_Rangers 9 Posted October 27, 2010 Share Posted October 27, 2010 Most of them are right about what they say - Saying Broadfoot should be ashamed and is an embarrassment is a joke though. Players will always dive, no matter what, some get away with it, some don't, but it's never usually such a huge talking point (In the last OF game, McGready got Jig sent off 'cause of a dive, never heard about that ) Didn't effect the result anyway, he sure looked guilty with those 3-1 gestures to the tims though Tims are scum, Hibs are scum, and we are top of the league!That's the thing tho broadfoot didn't dive there was contact made. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
FatPirateHooker 141 Posted October 27, 2010 Share Posted October 27, 2010 The celtic fan justifying the refs decision on the Stokes tackle because it was in the 1st minute :lol: Going by that logic, throwing punches should be allowed for the first 60 seconds of every game :lol:Him not seeing the tackle Samaras did on Naismith :lol: Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
FatPirateHooker 141 Posted October 27, 2010 Share Posted October 27, 2010 " http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/scotland/9129435.stmembarrassingPresumably Lennon will voluntarily ban Samaras and Stokes for one game each, in the interests of getting big decisions right? "Best post on there. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
1st_Jan_1994 4,868 Posted October 28, 2010 Author Share Posted October 28, 2010 Gordon Smith made the same point on the BBC radio Scotland tonight aswell.They asked him if Neil Lennon is entitled to demand answers from the SFA and he said "yes, he is. Provided he's asking for answers on why Stokes and Samaras stayed on the pitch also"Well said, that man. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jamie1807 146 Posted October 28, 2010 Share Posted October 28, 2010 Gordon Smith made the same point on the BBC radio Scotland tonight aswell.They asked him if Neil Lennon is entitled to demand answers from the SFA and he said "yes, he is. Provided he's asking for answers on why Stokes and Samaras stayed on the pitch also"Well said, that man.Someone should demand those questions to that fucking rhat Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheNuts 552 Posted October 28, 2010 Share Posted October 28, 2010 seeing charlie blow his top always makes my day. bitter wee catholic. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts