H72 265 Posted November 18, 2010 Share Posted November 18, 2010 Has Kerkar been made eligible to play yet? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JamieD 18,928 Posted November 18, 2010 Share Posted November 18, 2010 Walters not going to play a sweeper.We could have Beckenbauer, Scirea or Matthaus in the squad and there's still no way he'd play a sweeper. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JamieD 18,928 Posted November 18, 2010 Share Posted November 18, 2010 On the subject of which, sweepers are fucking underrated. Bring them back. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BRITNEY IS NOT FEELING IT 8,293 Posted November 19, 2010 Share Posted November 19, 2010 2-0 Win for Rangers , think there might be a chance of us taking our feet off the pedals once we get ahead Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tristan 11 Posted November 19, 2010 Share Posted November 19, 2010 Even if Broadfoot and Casper don't make it, folk are deluding themselves if they really expect Perry or Hutton to startIt would be:McGregorWhittaker McCulloch Weir FosterWeiss Davis Naismith FleckMiller Lafferty Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
we_are_the_people 2 Posted November 19, 2010 Share Posted November 19, 2010 Foster won't play left back, Whittaker would be switched with him. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Muff 245 Posted November 19, 2010 Author Share Posted November 19, 2010 we beat killie 2 weeks ago whilst fielding a weakened side, ive no reason to doubt we will beat them with the team we select,IF the players selected perform to level expected of a gers playerHardly a weakened side, Killie created the most chances, missed a few sitters and if they had a striker that night, would have burried us - for the best part of 55-60 minutes, we were a disgrace. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scott-RFC 308 Posted November 19, 2010 Share Posted November 19, 2010 Surely Lee McCulloch can handle Connor Sammon Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Muff 245 Posted November 19, 2010 Author Share Posted November 19, 2010 Surely Lee McCulloch can handle Connor SammonBased on what?Sammon has decent pace, is playing well, scoring goals, great in the air, strong, decent movement, a tim... McCulloch isn't a CB, is slow as fuck, playing shit, crap in the air, struggles to stay goal side and pick up a man... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scott-RFC 308 Posted November 19, 2010 Share Posted November 19, 2010 Based on what?Sammon has decent pace, is playing well, scoring goals, great in the air, strong, decent movement, a tim...I think you're over-rating Connor Sammon Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
we_are_the_people 2 Posted November 19, 2010 Share Posted November 19, 2010 Hardly a weakened side, Killie created the most chances, missed a few sitters and if they had a striker that night, would have burried us - for the best part of 55-60 minutes, we were a disgrace.Was not a weak team but certainly not full strength. When we have a fully fit squad 6 players that started that night would play. McGregor, Davis, Papac, Miller and Jelavic are very important players to us that did not start that night. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Muff 245 Posted November 19, 2010 Author Share Posted November 19, 2010 Was not a weak team but certainly not full strength. When we have a fully fit squad 6 players that started that night would play. McGregor, Davis, Papac, Miller and Jelavic are very important players to us that did not start that night. AlexanderWhittaker Bougherra Weir BroadfootWeiss McCulloch Edu Wylde Little Naismith Papac was injured? Jelavic was injured - so no point in mentioning them, Davis was dropped completely, for a reason I can't remember, Miller played 20 odd minutes... hardly a massive set of changes and for the majority of the game we were shite. 1 or 2 changes would not have made a difference as we have been that way for the majority of the season. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mmrfc1873 48 Posted November 19, 2010 Share Posted November 19, 2010 On the subject of which, sweepers are fucking underrated. Bring them back.I agree.I was a sweeper once, needless to say, I was outstanding, and criminally underrated. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
we_are_the_people 2 Posted November 19, 2010 Share Posted November 19, 2010 AlexanderWhittaker Bougherra Weir BroadfootWeiss McCulloch Edu Wylde Little Naismith Papac was injured? Jelavic was injured - so no point in mentioning them, Davis was dropped completely, for a reason I can't remember, Miller played 20 odd minutes... hardly a massive set of changes and for the majority of the game we were shite. 1 or 2 changes would not have made a difference as we have been that way for the majority of the season.How is there no point in mentioning Papac or Jelavic? The guy you quoted said we played a weakened team and compared to our first choice starting eleven(see below) it was a weakened team no matter if those players were injured or rested.McGregorWhittaker Bougherra Weir PapacNaismith Davis Edu/McCulloch WeissJelavic MillerUnless you believe that those five players in bold would not make a huge difference to the team that started against Kilmarnock that night?We did play poor, another reason why I believe and have stated this is going to be a tricky fixture at the weekend, especially with the amount of players missing. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Muff 245 Posted November 19, 2010 Author Share Posted November 19, 2010 How is there no point in mentioning Papac or Jelavic? The guy you quoted said we played a weakened team and compared to our first choice starting eleven(see below) it was a weakened team no matter if those players were injured or rested.McGregorWhittaker Bougherra Weir PapacNaismith Davis Edu/McCulloch WeissJelavic MillerUnless you believe that those five players in bold would not make a huge difference to the team that started against Kilmarnock that night?We did play poor, another reason why I believe and have stated this is going to be a tricky fixture at the weekend, especially with the amount of players missing.Some say Alexander is better all round than McGregor - anyway, Alexander kept a clean sheet so that argument does not wash!Again, some dispise Papac and do not rate him. I don't rate either Papac or Broadfoot, but Papac is a better all round player.Davis was left out altogether, was he not carrying a knock/rested? Anyway, as shit as Edu and McCulloch are together, they should still be good enough to compete with Kilmarnock... a team who made a few changes.Miller was given a rest and rightly so... Jelavic - not much point in mentioning him, played a few games, we have plenty to replace him and have won without him. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
we_are_the_people 2 Posted November 19, 2010 Share Posted November 19, 2010 Some say Alexander is better all round than McGregor - anyway, Alexander kept a clean sheet so that argument does not wash!I feel safe when Alexander plays, more consistent than McGregor and better at cross balls. Alan is a better shot stopper and when on his top form is the better keeper.Again, some dispise Papac and do not rate him. I don't rate either Papac or Broadfoot, but Papac is a better all round player.Papac has been one of our most consistent players since Walter came back, no contest Sasa is far superior to Kirk.Davis was left out altogether, was he not carrying a knock/rested? Anyway, as shit as Edu and McCulloch are together, they should still be good enough to compete with Kilmarnock... a team who made a few changes.That's the most probably team that will play Saturday lunchtime if all fit, been the same starting 11 that has played Kilmarnock's last two matches in the SPL. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jamie1807 146 Posted November 19, 2010 Share Posted November 19, 2010 Why the fuck are we always kicking off at 12 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Davie2909 21 Posted November 19, 2010 Share Posted November 19, 2010 Why the fuck are we always kicking off at 12Bacause they like to make us get out our bed at some shockingly early time on a saturday morning to goto the match mate Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
trueblue68 2,497 Posted November 19, 2010 Share Posted November 19, 2010 Broadfoot and Lafferty look as if they will make it. Foster also added to the squadhttp://www.rangers.co.uk/articles/20101119/boss-set-to-shuffle-pack_2254024_2224949 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RFC55 108,803 Posted November 19, 2010 Share Posted November 19, 2010 I just got a text saying that both Mcgeouch (sp) and Foster may feature tommorow Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Davie2909 21 Posted November 19, 2010 Share Posted November 19, 2010 FFS the way we are going we will have no players left by Christmas Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scott-RFC 308 Posted November 19, 2010 Share Posted November 19, 2010 I just got a text saying that both Mcgeouch (sp) and Foster may feature tommorow Who the fuck is Mcgeouch?? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
broxibear87 129 Posted November 19, 2010 Share Posted November 19, 2010 Who the fuck is Mcgeouch??u21 player, cracking prospect btw Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Prince of Denmark 10 Posted November 19, 2010 Share Posted November 19, 2010 Who the fuck is Mcgeouch??Think rfc52 means this guy....... Dylan McGeouch a 17 year old. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluejeff 16 Posted November 19, 2010 Share Posted November 19, 2010 Does anyone know if the game is on sky? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts