HarryH 15 Posted May 4, 2011 Share Posted May 4, 2011 Whats the latest guys?Dont tell me, 48 hours? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
1st_Jan_1994 4,868 Posted May 4, 2011 Share Posted May 4, 2011 well lets be honest here, wtf has john greig done for rangers in the last 20 odd yrs???? fuck all probs.we are his meal ticket and he probs fears of losing it if whyte gets control.dnt mean to bad mouth a gers legend, but it needs said.maybe greig wasnt 1 of the commitee who are against it. as i heard it wasnt the whole commitee that felt this way.Totally agree mate.Anyone voting against it could have a vested interest. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
thebooler 4,509 Posted May 4, 2011 Share Posted May 4, 2011 i dont believe for one second they would do anything that wasnt best for rangers. one of them is john greig ffs.Who was a legend how many years ago? Along wae Jardine.What qualifications do any of these two guys have tae be making decisions that affect the future of the Rangers (other than they played for the club with distinction)?I'd hazard a guess that it's guys like this that don't want Whyte near the club, as they may not be around too much longer when he takes over. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
krissg910 110 Posted May 4, 2011 Share Posted May 4, 2011 Does it really?Only if you're not just guessing about what he actually does.enlighten me too what a gr8 job he has done for rangers f.c in the last 20yrs????its harsh words im saying, i agree, but because a player was a legend does not mean we need to look after them for life. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
caseyjones 3,009 Posted May 4, 2011 Share Posted May 4, 2011 More shite talk, more top level sources, but still no bid. And so it goes on! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Plamf 39 Posted May 4, 2011 Share Posted May 4, 2011 Who was a legend how many years ago? Along wae Jardine.What qualifications do any of these two guys have tae be making decisions that affect the future of the Rangers (other than they played for the club with distinction)?I'd hazard a guess that it's guys like this that don't want Whyte near the club, as they may not be around too much longer when he takes over.nail on head Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ogbg 20 Posted May 4, 2011 Share Posted May 4, 2011 enlighten me too what a gr8 job he has done for rangers f.c in the last 20yrs????its harsh words im saying, i agree, but because a player was a legend does not mean we need to look after them for life.I don't know, but neither do you by the sounds of it. That's all I'm saying.He at least deserves the benefit of the doubt. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gunslinger 270 Posted May 4, 2011 Share Posted May 4, 2011 Totally agree mate.Anyone voting against it could have a vested interest.in the future of rangers. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Plamf 39 Posted May 4, 2011 Share Posted May 4, 2011 Where is John Greig when we are being slated in the press?You see club legends even with no remaining connection to a club coming out and defending them. Greig is employed by Rangers no less but appears to do nothing. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RFC55 108,804 Posted May 4, 2011 Share Posted May 4, 2011 John greig and iirc one other changed there stance last week according to a few of the rags Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gunslinger 270 Posted May 4, 2011 Share Posted May 4, 2011 Who was a legend how many years ago? Along wae Jardine.What qualifications do any of these two guys have tae be making decisions that affect the future of the Rangers (other than they played for the club with distinction)?I'd hazard a guess that it's guys like this that don't want Whyte near the club, as they may not be around too much longer when he takes over.you think whyte will come in and boot or the greatest ever ranger and jardine. cant see it myself. they may not be popular on here but this place is hardly representative. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
krissg910 110 Posted May 4, 2011 Share Posted May 4, 2011 Who was a legend how many years ago? Along wae Jardine.What qualifications do any of these two guys have tae be making decisions that affect the future of the Rangers (other than they played for the club with distinction)?I'd hazard a guess that it's guys like this that don't want Whyte near the club, as they may not be around too much longer when he takes over.thats 1 of the problems, we have too many former players still making a living from our club. now in the past i didnt mind this as we could afford it, but now imo they are taking money out the club that could be better spent.also this commitee should have been made up of men who have nothing to do with the club atm. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GeneralCartmanLee 313 Posted May 4, 2011 Share Posted May 4, 2011 Who was a legend how many years ago? Along wae Jardine.What qualifications do any of these two guys have tae be making decisions that affect the future of the Rangers (other than they played for the club with distinction)?I'd hazard a guess that it's guys like this that don't want Whyte near the club, as they may not be around too much longer when he takes over.Why would the guy voted greatest ever ranger not be around whoever takes over ?Greig and jardines role in this will be next to zero, whatever panel they are a part of... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spacecowboy 92 Posted May 4, 2011 Share Posted May 4, 2011 there would need to be an egm for that to happen. also a vote of all shareholders thats the last thing sdm would want he would need to front up to answer questions or at very least the directors would get to speak out.but with murray being the majority then if he wants it then it'll happen - no doubt.Hostile take overs are rare in business these days but if he is willing to sack the whole board and replace them with more yes men (probably Whytes people) then that'll be done. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdocherty72 215 Posted May 4, 2011 Share Posted May 4, 2011 What's the latest?Off topic : I've got a wee silver star. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
krissg910 110 Posted May 4, 2011 Share Posted May 4, 2011 I don't know, but neither do you by the sounds of it. That's all I'm saying.He at least deserves the benefit of the doubt.if he was doing anything worthwhile, we would know abt it. i honestly take no joy out of what im saying, but believe to be correct Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gunslinger 270 Posted May 4, 2011 Share Posted May 4, 2011 but with murray being the majority then if he wants it then it'll happen - no doubt.Hostile take overs are rare in business these days but if he is willing to sack the whole board and replace them with more yes men (probably Whytes people) then that'll be done.sure but he wil need to have an egm to do it. i am fairly sure of that. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
nvager 498 Posted May 4, 2011 Share Posted May 4, 2011 Another 48 hours then! :lol: Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
thebooler 4,509 Posted May 4, 2011 Share Posted May 4, 2011 I don't know, but neither do you by the sounds of it. That's all I'm saying.He at least deserves the benefit of the doubt.Greig and Jardine are figureheads for the club.None of them have the required qualifications to run a club/business the size of Rangers FC that I'm aware of.If they have, and you know of these qualifications, I'll gladly stand corrected. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
thebooler 4,509 Posted May 4, 2011 Share Posted May 4, 2011 in the future of rangers.This could also be the case. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
caseyjones 3,009 Posted May 4, 2011 Share Posted May 4, 2011 I'm no great fan of Greig's boardroom role these last years, but nobody on here knows a)whether he is for or against any proposed bid, or b)what his reasons would are for his decision. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
thebooler 4,509 Posted May 4, 2011 Share Posted May 4, 2011 Why would the guy voted greatest ever ranger not be around whoever takes over ?Greig and jardines role in this will be next to zero, whatever panel they are a part of...Greig is on the Committee who have been charged with deciding whether someone is the right person to be taking over the club.I've already asked the question. What are his qaulifications in a business sense to be charged with making such decisions? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
caseyjones 3,009 Posted May 4, 2011 Share Posted May 4, 2011 Greig is on the Committee who have been charged with deciding whether someone is the right person to be taking over the club.I've already asked the question. What are his qaulifications in a business sense to be charged with making such decisions?They've been working under a conniving cunt for years, that's qualification enough! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gunslinger 270 Posted May 4, 2011 Share Posted May 4, 2011 i just think its a wild assumption that theese people are just doing there matea favour or trying to keep there jobs. aj will go regardless hes said as muchbain is on a shoogly peg either way unless hes better at his job than is made out and then its fine if he staysjohn mcleland will likley stay d macintyre could go i suppose but may well be needed. j greig will be there till he dies unless whyte is a retard. d king will stay he is a big shareholder and p murray may well of course but they arent on the comitte. as for sdm threatening them with the heave ho bain will have a contract and if sdm wants his last act to be getting rid of the two chairmen who rescued him when he couldnt hack the criticism anymore and the greatest ever ranger hes more retarded than we could ever have guessed. it just doesnt seem likley in the real world. what does is theese men are all rangers men through and through and want time and space to make the right decision. after all this decsion could shape rangers destiny for decades to come. people should ask thenselves what they would do in this situation then consider why any other rangers man should be different. before running of at the lip. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
thebooler 4,509 Posted May 4, 2011 Share Posted May 4, 2011 They've been working under a conniving cunt for years, that's qualification enough!That's also true, and a good enough reason why Whyte may get rid of them if when he takes over. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts