TerryTibbs 224 Posted March 3, 2011 Share Posted March 3, 2011 Now I'm a fan of Sasa Papac, not a great footballer but as full backs go, he is solid defensively... But, when we play with 5 at the back, in European or Old Firm games, why dont we play Gregg Wylde left back? Especially when we had no wingers (except Diouf who was up front)He's quick, good delivery, and gives another dimension when we attack.Where as I can only remember Papac being in Celtics half once tonight and he shifted the ball to his weaker foot and put in a terrible cross Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amac9 2,060 Posted March 3, 2011 Share Posted March 3, 2011 Much better at LW.But if Papac is out then I'd rather see Wylde at LB than Whittaker or Foster. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AldoKrfc 106 Posted March 3, 2011 Share Posted March 3, 2011 No dont encourage walter Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AndyRfc 20 Posted March 3, 2011 Share Posted March 3, 2011 Never liked Papac myself, Wylde has a touch like a rapist. Can put some delivery in mind you. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TerryTibbs 224 Posted March 3, 2011 Author Share Posted March 3, 2011 Much better at LW.But if Papac is out then I'd rather see Wylde at LB than Whittaker or Foster.Yeah he's a natural left winger, and should be played their in SPL games, just the European games to give us a bit extra width in a wing back rolePersonally, I'd get the 5-4-1 to fuck but that's not going to happen Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MasterD 7,435 Posted March 3, 2011 Share Posted March 3, 2011 Cos he's not that strong or great defensively Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Davie2909 21 Posted March 3, 2011 Share Posted March 3, 2011 I though he did well when he came on. Won us a decent free kick that was wasted as per usual. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
disgruntled_bear 157 Posted March 3, 2011 Share Posted March 3, 2011 Wylde is overrated, I'd rather see at this moment in time. Whittaker switched to LB and Foster at RB if Papac is out for a lengthy period of time. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scott-RFC 308 Posted March 3, 2011 Share Posted March 3, 2011 Seemed to be having all sorts of problems knocking it past wilson into the acres of space in behindNot convinced by him, although will give him plenty more time Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Goianegra 4,680 Posted March 3, 2011 Share Posted March 3, 2011 His speed absolutely raped Wilson. A player I'd love to see more of, LB or LW! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
hutchy14 4 Posted March 3, 2011 Share Posted March 3, 2011 I'm wanting to see.what this Kerkar boy has to offer. Should give him a game. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gunslinger 270 Posted March 3, 2011 Share Posted March 3, 2011 because hes pish at lb Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Muff 245 Posted March 3, 2011 Share Posted March 3, 2011 Gregg Wylde is NOT a left-back! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest SandyWATP Posted March 3, 2011 Share Posted March 3, 2011 I don't get all this "not convinced" by him bollocks. Just because he hasn't set the heather alight in his last 2 appearances (I thought he was good against St Johnstone) doesn't mean he isn't very talented. He has showed earlier in the season what he is capable of. He's rapid, can beat a man and has a wicked delivery on him. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MasterD 7,435 Posted March 3, 2011 Share Posted March 3, 2011 I don't get all this "not convinced" by him bollocks. Just because he hasn't set the heather alight in his last 2 appearances (I thought he was good against St Johnstone) doesn't mean he isn't very talented. He has showed earlier in the season what he is capable of. He's rapid, can beat a man and has a wicked delivery on him.Me either, he's had about 30mins in his preferred position this season and done well from what I've seen, better than others i could mentionHe's a left winger, play him there or not at all, and people saying a good winger can play on either side are talking pish, some can, some can't Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
maxwellrfc 6 Posted March 3, 2011 Share Posted March 3, 2011 If we're playin 5-4-1 I would have him as a wingback but I wouldn't play him LB in a 4 man defence. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
nvager 498 Posted March 3, 2011 Share Posted March 3, 2011 Should have started before Fleck tonight. Fleck was awful. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
maxwellrfc 6 Posted March 3, 2011 Share Posted March 3, 2011 Should have started before Fleck tonight. Fleck was awful. Would have made alot more sense. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts