gunslinger 270 Posted May 14, 2011 Share Posted May 14, 2011 well as shareholders we were promised information before monday and now we arent getting it till next month. as for the name change, spangles isnt exactly wrong. but its probably fairly simple. if whyte registered a company called The Rangers FC Group Limited months ago that would have been big news. so he called it wavetower. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
boss 1,941 Posted May 14, 2011 Share Posted May 14, 2011 Yes The Rangers FC Group Limited own Rangers FC ?, as you will be aware the entity known as Wavetower has been expunged from Companies House, The Rangers FC Group Limited is a company set up for a particular purpose, as will become clear in the fullness of time.No, you are completely wrong. Wavetower has simply changed its name to The Rangers FC Group - it is exactly the same legal entity. Say I change my name from 'boss' to 'spanglesisdeluded', I am still the same person, I have not been expunged. You can still find Wavetower on CH if you search under 'previous names'. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MosesMcNeil 1,664 Posted May 14, 2011 Share Posted May 14, 2011 My bad.So, in the space of a couple of days you claimed Whyte did not say 'Rangers are now debt free' and then 'the great Scottish Institution that is Rangers FC, is no longer in Scotland, it is in London.'Your bad right enough - a talker of shite. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NessFTW 40 Posted May 14, 2011 Share Posted May 14, 2011 This thread has amused me greatly. Thanks for clearing that one up Boss and Bluedell Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Johnson 27 Posted May 14, 2011 Share Posted May 14, 2011 What other companies are incorporated in The Rangers FC Group?Seems we'll have to wait till June 6 to find out.Official Companies House rules on the naming of firms says:The use of this word normally implies more than one company under the same corporate ownership. To justify this word there should be a minimum of 2 companies or 2 businesses (in addition to the ‘Group’ company) in the group. You must meet this condition on registration and details of the ‘group’ companies or businesses will be required. If the name clearly shows that the company is to promote the interests of a group of individuals, then the name will normally be approved. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
spangles 7 Posted May 14, 2011 Author Share Posted May 14, 2011 So, in the space of a couple of days you claimed Whyte did not say 'Rangers are now debt free' and then 'the great Scottish Institution that is Rangers FC, is no longer in Scotland, it is in London.'Your bad right enough - a talker of shite. You are correct, whyte did not say Rangers are debt free, wavetower do not as of now own Rangers, and the registered owners of Rangers are based and registered in London. You will not be surprised by what is in store after the "restructuring". Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NessFTW 40 Posted May 14, 2011 Share Posted May 14, 2011 You are correct, whyte did not say Rangers are debt free, wavetower do not as of now own Rangers, and the registered owners of Rangers are based and registered in London. You will not be surprised by what is in store after the "restructuring". Why don't you just tell us what you 'think' is in store so boss and Bluedell can strike you down again Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
spangles 7 Posted May 14, 2011 Author Share Posted May 14, 2011 Why don't you just tell us what you 'think' is in store so boss and Bluedell can strike you down again You will have to point out where that occurred, as stated wavetower do not own Rangers, the name as I posted early yesterday has been changed with something else in mind, as someone else stated a group is more than one, the results of this grouping and the cost will unfold at a pace decided by our acquirer. This has already been shown by the delay to issuing the promised prospectus, I would like to see AJ comment on this, also I wouldn't bank on to much being revealed on 06/06/2011 and certainly nothing that will make anyone any the wiser. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NessFTW 40 Posted May 14, 2011 Share Posted May 14, 2011 You will have to point out where that occurred, as stated wavetower do not own Rangers, the name as I posted early yesterday has been changed with something else in mind, as someone else stated a group is more than one, the results of this grouping and the cost will unfold at a pace decided by our acquirer. This has already been shown by the delay to issuing the promised prospectus, I would like to see AJ comment on this, also I wouldn't bank on to much being revealed on 06/06/2011 and certainly nothing that will make anyone any the wiser. Let me guess, hmmm.....The other company is something to do with Andrew Ellis and his property developing nous?Why don't you tell us all what you know then? What is your agenda here? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
spangles 7 Posted May 14, 2011 Author Share Posted May 14, 2011 wavetower was formed by ellis. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gunslinger 270 Posted May 14, 2011 Share Posted May 14, 2011 our new chairman Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluedell 14 Posted May 14, 2011 Share Posted May 14, 2011 You will have to point out where that occurred, as stated wavetower do not own Rangers, the name as I posted early yesterday has been changed with something else in mind, as someone else stated a group is more than one,You can carry on saying Wavetower don't own Rangers and you will carry on being incorrect.As for the group, it has 7 subsidiaries. I'd say that was enough to qualify as a "group". Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gunslinger 270 Posted May 14, 2011 Share Posted May 14, 2011 You can carry on saying Wavetower don't own Rangers and you will carry on being incorrect.As for the group, it has 7 subsidiaries. I'd say that was enough to qualify as a "group".any idea what they do or are for. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RFC55 108,716 Posted May 14, 2011 Share Posted May 14, 2011 boss Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NessFTW 40 Posted May 14, 2011 Share Posted May 14, 2011 I don't know if it's just me but it seems a bit silly to continually question goings on behind the scenes that we probably don't know much about and definitely cannot do anything about.It's just tiresome really. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
roidrager 10 Posted May 14, 2011 Share Posted May 14, 2011 Straight forward? i know nothing apart from spangles has a thoery and he will prove it one day, one day he will have his day, or maybe not Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RFC55 108,716 Posted May 14, 2011 Share Posted May 14, 2011 Btw Boss or any other Admin, as Frankie had coniremd Spangles has had many a different account on here, why is he honestly allowed to post on here? He is obviously at it and his behaviour i the takeover thread was pathetic also. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
spangles 7 Posted May 14, 2011 Author Share Posted May 14, 2011 You can carry on saying Wavetower don't own Rangers and you will carry on being incorrect.As for the group, it has 7 subsidiaries. I'd say that was enough to qualify as a "group".As you can carry on saying they do when they do not. Wavetower was a wholly owned subsidary of liberty capital despite being formed by ellis, who now have an unreachable website, allegedly under reconstruction along with other things, that may involve rent books. If you wish to continue insisting wavetower own Rangers, carry on it's a free choice. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RFC55 108,716 Posted May 14, 2011 Share Posted May 14, 2011 I was thinking this was going to be a long and boring night. I shall now watch this thread and Bluedell rip spangles a new arsehole not even the dirty beast could fix for him Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
djbroxybear 660 Posted May 14, 2011 Share Posted May 14, 2011 " Whyte hasn't a pot to piss in " thats all we heard from Spangles in takeover thread... Hmmmmm he's still coming on spewing shite on here.. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
boss 1,941 Posted May 14, 2011 Share Posted May 14, 2011 What other companies are incorporated in The Rangers FC Group?Seems we'll have to wait till June 6 to find out.Official Companies House rules on the naming of firms says:The use of this word normally implies more than one company under the same corporate ownership. To justify this word there should be a minimum of 2 companies or 2 businesses (in addition to the ‘Group’ company) in the group. You must meet this condition on registration and details of the ‘group’ companies or businesses will be required. If the name clearly shows that the company is to promote the interests of a group of individuals, then the name will normally be approved.Rangers already have some subsidiaries (for instance, Rangers Youth Development Ltd) and so Rangers met the CH requirement regarding the word 'group' even before Whyte. So no great mystery here. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NessFTW 40 Posted May 14, 2011 Share Posted May 14, 2011 As you can carry on saying they do when they do not. Wavetower was a wholly owned subsidary of liberty capital despite being formed by ellis, who now have an unreachable website, allegedly under reconstruction along with other things, that may involve rent books. If you wish to continue insisting wavetower own Rangers, carry on it's a free choice.Mate how much green do you smoke? You think people are following you as well? You sound like you have discovered extra terrestrial life and the FBI are trying to silence you Who actually cares about whatever allegations you are throwing around? What are the consequences of the conspiracy you are trying to unravel? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
boss 1,941 Posted May 14, 2011 Share Posted May 14, 2011 as stated wavetower do not own RangersI have no idea why you continue to peddle this lie. It has been explained to you several times. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smile 26,600 Posted May 14, 2011 Share Posted May 14, 2011 Straight forward? i know nothing apart from spangles has a thoery and he will prove it one day, one day he will have his day, or maybe notSounds very fenian. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluedell 14 Posted May 14, 2011 Share Posted May 14, 2011 any idea what they do or are for.See Boss's post 46. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts