TMB 14,167 Posted July 9, 2011 Share Posted July 9, 2011 Either you shouldnt be allowed to post, or you should carry a warning when you do post after your "exclusive" yesterday.Several members replied and quoted your post re signings and you ingnored them all. Rangers fans come one here everyday looking for info, especially on signings, and posts like yours yesterday just get hopes up, including mine.Away and poke yer sister while she wanks yer dug. Again.That exclusive will come good given a long enough time frame. Just you wait and see! Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
OLE SUPER WILBERT 2,475 Posted July 9, 2011 Share Posted July 9, 2011 Your the one that needs to get a grip. I think anyone in Scottish football can see that Kayal was the standout centre mid last season. Take off your blue tinted specs for a minute and see the writing on the wall. I certainly don't speak for everyone when I say if I could go back in time I'd have Kayal in our team in a heartbeat.Why do you think Kayal is so great?He's not a great passer, doesn't score many, doesn't dominate games and he isn't that good a tackler. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
WWTC 2,247 Posted July 9, 2011 Share Posted July 9, 2011 That exclusive will come good given a long enough time frame. Just you wait and see!Source? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ben10 2,265 Posted July 9, 2011 Share Posted July 9, 2011 Why do you think Kayal is so great?He's not a great passer, doesn't score many, doesn't dominate games and he isn't that good a tackler.I'll agree with the tackler part. He isn't a stallwart by any means. But he is a great passer IMO, and it annoys me that Rangers scouting system haven't travelled down these routes of looking for players in countries that were supposedly rank rotten at football. He dominated a couple of Old firm games, the 3-0 game at parkhead is an obvious one. All I'm saying is, that based on the majority of last season, Kayal did shine for Celtic more than Davis did for Rangers. I'm not needing a tin hat because SirWalterSmithLegend's posts have already given me brain damage. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SirWalterSmithLegend 206 Posted July 9, 2011 Share Posted July 9, 2011 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
OLE SUPER WILBERT 2,475 Posted July 9, 2011 Share Posted July 9, 2011 I'll agree with the tackler part. He isn't a stallwart by any means. But he is a great passer IMO, and it annoys me that Rangers scouting system haven't travelled down these routes of looking for players in countries that were supposedly rank rotten at football. He dominated a couple of Old firm games, the 3-0 game at parkhead is an obvious one. All I'm saying is, that based on the majority of last season, Kayal did shine for Celtic more than Davis did for Rangers. I'm not needing a tin hat because SirWalterSmithLegend's posts have already given me brain damage.You're admitting that he isn't a good tackler, he's a defensive midfeilder so tackling is an important part of his game.He isnt a great passer He didnt dominate the 3 0 game, the whole celt*c team dominated us, he didnt stand out anymore than the rest of them. Last season wasn't Davis best season but he still contributed with some important goals and assists, Kayal didnt. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
King Jela 20,360 Posted July 9, 2011 Share Posted July 9, 2011 You're admitting that he isn't a good tackler, he's a defensive midfeilder so tackling is an important part of his game.He isnt a great passer He didnt dominate the 3 0 game, the whole celt*c team dominated us, he didnt stand out anymore than the rest of them. .Last season wasn't Davis best season but he still contributed with some important goals and assists, Kayal didntDo defensive midfielder's usually provide a lot of goals and assists ?Imo, too many people on here over-look how good Kayal actually is because he plays for the dark side and over rate Davis to the maximum because he plays for us. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ben10 2,265 Posted July 9, 2011 Share Posted July 9, 2011 You're admitting that he isn't a good tackler, he's a defensive midfeilder so tackling is an important part of his game.He isnt a great passer He didnt dominate the 3 0 game, the whole celt*c team dominated us, he didnt stand out anymore than the rest of them. Last season wasn't Davis best season but he still contributed with some important goals and assists, Kayal didnt.A defensive midfielder ? Says who ? Is Davis suddenly a good tackler ? And, yes, he is a good passer Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ben10 2,265 Posted July 9, 2011 Share Posted July 9, 2011 Do defensive midfielder's usually provide a lot of goals and assists ?Imo, too many people on here over-look how good Kayal actually is because he plays for the dark side and over rate Davis to the maximum because he plays for us.Exactly the point I'm making. Some folk on here can't actually come to terms with the fact that seltic have a decent player in their ranks. I did'nt say this guy is an international superstar, I'm saying he had a far better season than Davis did. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
WWTC 2,247 Posted July 9, 2011 Share Posted July 9, 2011 That exclusive will come good given a long enough time frame. Just you wait and see!When wankin yer dug, tell yer sister not to try and kiss it like she kept doin wi me, the dug will take her face aff.Ya bullshittin cunt Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
OLE SUPER WILBERT 2,475 Posted July 9, 2011 Share Posted July 9, 2011 Do defensive midfielder's usually provide a lot of goals and assists ?Imo, too many people on here over-look how good Kayal actually is because he plays for the dark side and over rate Davis to the maximum because he plays for us.That's a fair point to make mate. The guy before said that Kayal wasnt a good tackler meaning he didnt win the ball like a good defensive midfeilder should, he did say that Kayal contributed more than Davis did so the point i was making was that he doesnt win the ball, doesn't score and doesnt create. I dont see how he can contribute more than Davis if he cant do any of that.I rate players on how good they are and not who they play for Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ben10 2,265 Posted July 9, 2011 Share Posted July 9, 2011 That's a fair point to make mate. The guy before said that Kayal wasnt a good tackler meaning he didnt win the ball like a good defensive midfeilder should, he did say that Kayal contributed more than Davis did so the point i was making was that he doesnt win the ball, doesn't score and doesnt create. I dont see how he can contribute more than Davis if he cant do any of that.I rate players on how good they are and not who they play for Who says Kayals a defensive midfielder ? If it's Kayal and Ledley in centre mid then I would say Ledleys more a defensive mid. And did Davis score more goals? or get more assists than kayal last season? Or is that a figment of your imagination ? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
OLE SUPER WILBERT 2,475 Posted July 9, 2011 Share Posted July 9, 2011 A defensive midfielder ? Says who ? Is Davis suddenly a good tackler ? And, yes, he is a good passerKayal is a defensive midfeilder, i never once said Davis was a good tackler, what i said was Davis contributes more than Kayal. If you think Kayal is a good passer that's your opinion but i think you are wrong. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
King Jela 20,360 Posted July 9, 2011 Share Posted July 9, 2011 That's a fair point to make mate. The guy before said that Kayal wasnt a good tackler meaning he didnt win the ball like a good defensive midfeilder should, he did say that Kayal contributed more than Davis did so the point i was making was that he doesnt win the ball, doesn't score and doesnt create. I dont see how he can contribute more than Davis if he cant do any of that.I rate players on how good they are and not who they play for I actually genuinely believe that Kayal did contribute more to the celtic team than what Davis did for us, I know it wont be a popular opinion but I couldn't give a fuck, I call it as I see it. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
King Jela 20,360 Posted July 9, 2011 Share Posted July 9, 2011 SPL alone.Davis scored 4, Kayal 2. Davis assisted 7, Kayal, 0.Davis stated 37 games, Kayal 18. Minute wise Davis placed much more.For the amount of talent many on here believe Davis actually has, that is pretty poor statistics. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
OLE SUPER WILBERT 2,475 Posted July 9, 2011 Share Posted July 9, 2011 Who says Kayals a defensive midfielder ? If it's Kayal and Ledley in centre mid then I would say Ledleys more a defensive mid. And did Davis score more goals? or get more assists than kayal last season? Or is that a figment of your imagination ?Davis got 8th most assists in the SPL last season, Kayal wasn't in the top ten- Davis contributed more Davis scored 4 goals last season, Kayal scored 2- Davis contributed more Facts not my imagination Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bilko89 507 Posted July 9, 2011 Share Posted July 9, 2011 Davis got 8th most assists in the SPL last season, Kayal wasn't in the top ten- Davis contributed more Davis scored 4 goals last season, Kayal scored 2- Davis contributed more Facts not my imagination kayals nothing more than an ankle biter with his sly kicks he takes at players, he's pish! Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
KBOO72 4,359 Posted July 9, 2011 Share Posted July 9, 2011 Oh sorry , my mistake , I've opened the kayal thread . I thought this was the eremenko thread .Silly boy . Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ted E Bayer 484 Posted July 9, 2011 Share Posted July 9, 2011 This whole thread is a waste of time. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JCS 649 Posted July 9, 2011 Share Posted July 9, 2011 Let's get back on track eh? Eremenko is, at best, an average SPL player. I don't believe he will add significantly to our squad or bring anything new and innovative. let's look elsewhere...assuming we are actually considering him! Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ibroxgers25 18 Posted July 9, 2011 Share Posted July 9, 2011 This whole thread is a waste of time. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ultras 18 Posted July 9, 2011 Share Posted July 9, 2011 I'd like to see him here, hope we do sign him. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted July 9, 2011 Share Posted July 9, 2011 By the way just to throw my 2 cents in. Once again there are certain aspects of their game that each are better at.No doubt kayal has been a superb find and is a quality player , not just for them but in general.They are very very similar players. Neither is more attacking or too defensive they are both "box-2-box" players imo. Both with great engines good passing , movement , intellegence on the football pitch. IMO Kayal is a better defender but Davis is better going forward. Davis has a better touch , close control and passing but kayal is better at the defensive side e.g. harrying the opposition , tackling and marking.It is very hard to split them no doubts but on his game davis IS better that Kayal but last season kayal outshone davis i think only because of the OF games.People that go on about comparing their statistics....how many games did davis play compared to kayal ?...jw btw. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
topgoalie 637 Posted July 9, 2011 Share Posted July 9, 2011 Defo truth in this post.Kayal is a good passer and tackler, he was the main reason Celtic started to dominate some of the Old Firm games. The scum missed him in the 3-1 game at the start of the season and was the only one in the cup final who did anything for that lot.Kayal would have got player of the year last season if he was not injured for a long spell, imo.Is he better than Davis? Well I don't think you can base an argument due to half a season.what is it with this kayal f..k him sign eremenko now kayal could not lace his boots or steve davis yet again what is so special about this guy that on a rangers website we even talk about him can u imagine in timmys website saying oh i think davis is better than kayal .... dont think so,..... he has played a few good games against rangers big deal i dont know about the rest of the time because im not interested Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TMB 14,167 Posted July 10, 2011 Share Posted July 10, 2011 When wankin yer dug, tell yer sister not to try and kiss it like she kept doin wi me, the dug will take her face aff.Ya bullshittin cuntB7 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.