sdunsmb 43 Posted July 30, 2011 Share Posted July 30, 2011 What the fuck?Why?A better performance today and the main thing was the 3 points but I just can't get my head around the system Ally is trying to play.Why don't we play Davis in CM with Edu/Jig and then two wingers? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SirWalterSmithLegend 206 Posted July 30, 2011 Share Posted July 30, 2011 The victory will paper over that thanks. Now lets move on. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scott-RFC 308 Posted July 30, 2011 Share Posted July 30, 2011 The victory will paper over that thanks. Now lets move on.As will the performance Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SirWalterSmithLegend 206 Posted July 30, 2011 Share Posted July 30, 2011 As will the performanceResult will paper over the performance too. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
sdunsmb 43 Posted July 30, 2011 Author Share Posted July 30, 2011 The victory will paper over that thanks. Now lets move on.For me the victory will not paper over huge tactical mistakes that have already cost us two games this season and will cost us many more if we don't change it. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AldoKrfc 106 Posted July 30, 2011 Share Posted July 30, 2011 Lucky we played against a very poor team. That system against a decent team would struggle. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SirWalterSmithLegend 206 Posted July 30, 2011 Share Posted July 30, 2011 For me the victory will not paper over huge tactical mistakes that have already cost us two games this season and will cost us many more if we don't change it.To you and i of course it wont, but to the masses who care only about our result here and now, the truth wont matter. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scott-RFC 308 Posted July 30, 2011 Share Posted July 30, 2011 For me the victory will not paper over huge tactical mistakes that have already cost us two games this season and will cost us many more if we don't change it.I really dont know why you are looking for a moan so quickly after we won, and played well but Ill point out that Edu was on the right side a lot more than Davis today. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
sdunsmb 43 Posted July 30, 2011 Author Share Posted July 30, 2011 As will the performanceI wasn't overly impressed with the performance but it was an improvement which obviously good and three points which is even better.I am just extremely worried by our tactics and team selection. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SirWalterSmithLegend 206 Posted July 30, 2011 Share Posted July 30, 2011 Lucky we played against a very poor team. That system against a decent team would get embarrassed. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
sdunsmb 43 Posted July 30, 2011 Author Share Posted July 30, 2011 I really dont know why you are looking for a moan so quickly after we won, and played well but Ill point out that Edu was on the right side a lot more than Davis today.Yeh, I noticed that. It just all seems very strange to me. I am moaning because I am concerned and frustrated. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
sdunsmb 43 Posted July 30, 2011 Author Share Posted July 30, 2011 Lucky we played against a very poor team. That system against a decent team would struggle. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bazza 21 Posted July 30, 2011 Share Posted July 30, 2011 I quite like the idea of Wallace and Papac interchanging down the left.As for the others, it looks to me like they play more of a midfield three allowing space on the right for whittaker to bomb forward.I'm no a great fan of having both Edu and McCullloch playing but it worked ok. Thought Naismith was better when moved back into the midfield too. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
martyboy2009 11 Posted July 30, 2011 Share Posted July 30, 2011 McCoist needs to get a grip soon. Those decisions today were daft bit we got away with it! Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
supermac 115 Posted July 30, 2011 Share Posted July 30, 2011 The only midfielder we have is Steven Davis, hurry up Jamie Ness eh? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
sdunsmb 43 Posted July 30, 2011 Author Share Posted July 30, 2011 I quite like the idea of Wallace and Papac interchanging down the left.As for the others, it looks to me like they play more of a midfield three allowing space on the right for whittaker to bomb forward.I'm no a great fan of having both Edu and McCullloch playing but it worked ok. Thought Naismith was better when moved back into the midfield too.I don't and if I had to choose one to be more advanced, it would be Wallace and not Papac.Yeh, they are kind of playing a midfield three. It worked today but personally I despise this system. I would rather see Naismith on RW, Davis and one other in CM and a left winger on the LW. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Misteral 2,932 Posted July 30, 2011 Share Posted July 30, 2011 I wasn't that impressed by the performance today but have no real complaints about it either as after our recent form and results that was an improvement. The same result on Wednesday and we will all be very happy. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gordo7 147 Posted July 30, 2011 Share Posted July 30, 2011 I quite like the idea of Wallace and Papac interchanging down the left.As for the others, it looks to me like they play more of a midfield three allowing space on the right for whittaker to bomb forward.I'm no a great fan of having both Edu and McCullloch playing but it worked ok. Thought Naismith was better when moved back into the midfield too.Tell me you're not serious. Papac had one good cross, the rest of the match, nothing. And he hasn't shown anything in the past that makes me think he'll be good in that position. He was almost a waste of a jersey today. Proper LM for me thanks Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Creampuff 22,628 Posted July 30, 2011 Share Posted July 30, 2011 Ally might as well leave now, he's clearly never gonna win some of you over. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
sdunsmb 43 Posted July 30, 2011 Author Share Posted July 30, 2011 Ally might as well leave now, he's clearly never gonna win some of you over.If he continues to play this system , then he won't win me over. However, I'm sure he will change it and we will improve, not to mention Lafferty back and new signings. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amac9 2,060 Posted July 30, 2011 Share Posted July 30, 2011 Amazing midfield selection and one we hopefully won't see ever again. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bears r us 30,791 Posted July 30, 2011 Share Posted July 30, 2011 Ally might as well leave now, he's clearly never gonna win some of you over. The negative posters on here are doing my head in, if only I could resist the lure of RM I would be fine. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
nachothelegend 1,932 Posted July 30, 2011 Share Posted July 30, 2011 I really don't know what Ally is doing with this Midfield now and its got me beat ,but I hope he knows what he is doing but I Just dont know , It is frustrating when they both give the ball away consistently.Ally looks Perplexed when on the Camera today and he looks very uncomfortable with his situation .IMOI know its early but he looks under quite a bit of pressure and I do hope and Pray that this works out for him .Big Improvement but Edu and Clugger in there look lost at times and I am very concerned about that partnership in CM . Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.