Jack The Flipper 5,936 Posted December 20, 2011 Share Posted December 20, 2011 also huge taig Brian mcnally is tweeting that tax settlement is some sort of huge crime.It's hilarious, we've not even been prosecuted.Innoscent until proven guilty - something they have not been able to do so far. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hutchy WATP 462 Posted December 20, 2011 Share Posted December 20, 2011 also huge taig Brian mcnally is tweeting that tax settlement is some sort of huge crime.Everyone with any relation to them is going to be hurting so much, expect every dirty underhanded tactic to be broke out in the near future if this does turn out to be true Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GeneralCartmanLee 313 Posted December 20, 2011 Share Posted December 20, 2011 GCL doomsday did mention on RC tonight that he asked Whyte if he was speaking to HMRCand he confirmed that he was but it was in London but not up here.i know very little about tax except i pay too fecking much and i bow to the guys on here who do know their stuff.It was confirmed last month Sir Davids lawyers are representing rangers in this case as it could probably have a huge knock on for MIH as well....but i am sure mr flipper knows best.Too many false dawns to give a shit about anything that a discredited idiot like darylllll king spouts..... Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
linfield1690 4,249 Posted December 20, 2011 Share Posted December 20, 2011 121 guests maybe it is true Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ben10 2,272 Posted December 20, 2011 Share Posted December 20, 2011 Can we not ban guests/tims and have a members only farrier free bears den Ahh blissOh Give Me a Home.. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gogzy 31,195 Posted December 20, 2011 Share Posted December 20, 2011 Quite interesting stuff...but it ain't whyte that is handling these negotiations...more darylllll fantasyWasn't it just in the papers that Whyte was in london trying to sort it all out? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Broxi 11,484 Posted December 20, 2011 Share Posted December 20, 2011 A lot of the guests will be Rangers fans without an account. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Right_To_Censor 1,951 Posted December 20, 2011 Share Posted December 20, 2011 A lot of the guests will be Rangers fans without an account.righhhht Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Broxi 11,484 Posted December 20, 2011 Share Posted December 20, 2011 righhhht... BUT, most of them will be hurting tims Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack The Flipper 5,936 Posted December 20, 2011 Share Posted December 20, 2011 It was confirmed last month Sir Davids lawyers are representing rangers in this case as it could probably have a huge knock on for MIH as well....but i am sure mr flipper knows best.Too many false dawns to give a shit about anything that a discredited idiot like darylllll king spouts.....They may very well be representing Rangers but it is nothing legaly to do with Murray now. So much so, Murray's lawyers will not be able to breach confidentiality and tell Murray of the day to day details of the case without the express permission of rangers - of which they would have done.As I have said the liability is with Rangers the company. The only reason Murray's lawyers would have been selected for the job is they were probably involved in his past dealings which no doubt triggered all this nonsense. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
dardo54 11 Posted December 20, 2011 Share Posted December 20, 2011 trueblue68, Hutchy WATP and Right_To_Censor 3 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hutchy WATP 462 Posted December 20, 2011 Share Posted December 20, 2011 righhhhtI can half vouch for that, I wasn't a member for long enough cause every time I looked in there was always 2 or more people in-fighting But then I chose to STEP UP AND PLAY! :crabflute: (I cringed at the cheesiness of that but its for all the timothys out there ) Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hutchy WATP 462 Posted December 20, 2011 Share Posted December 20, 2011 nice one Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Right_To_Censor 1,951 Posted December 20, 2011 Share Posted December 20, 2011 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
broxibear87 129 Posted December 20, 2011 Share Posted December 20, 2011 I'd prefer it to be in the queen's speech! Have a rep mate, how fucking amazing would that be though Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Broxi 11,484 Posted December 20, 2011 Share Posted December 20, 2011 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GeneralCartmanLee 313 Posted December 20, 2011 Share Posted December 20, 2011 They may very well be representing Rangers but it is nothing legaly to do with Murray now. So much so, Murray's lawyers will not be able to breach confidentiality and tell Murray of the day to day details of the case without the express permission of rangers - of which they would have done.As I have said the liability is with Rangers the company. The only reason Murray's lawyers would have been selected for the job is they were probably involved in his past dealings which no doubt triggered all this nonsense.Apart from Sir David is paying the bill...is that legal enough..Whyte has nothing to do with the defence at the tax tribunal...Stop making up legal precedents you clearly know nothing about Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
linfield1690 4,249 Posted December 20, 2011 Share Posted December 20, 2011 http://m.youtube.com/#/watch?v=CzCgRKyanZo Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack The Flipper 5,936 Posted December 20, 2011 Share Posted December 20, 2011 Apart from Sir David is paying the bill...is that legal enough..Whyte has nothing to do with the defence at the tax tribunal...Stop making up legal precedents you clearly know nothing about You're cleary just being a dick for the sake of it. If you have such a handle on things why not educate us all, instead of pointing out that this and that is wrong? Isn't that what educated people do? I'd say it's only tossers that do what you're doing atm.Give me a source then, which bill is Murray paying?Lawyers bill? Tax bill?Hiding away in ambiguity in for fear of being called out and seen as what you earlier called me?I await your response. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ace 3,556 Posted December 20, 2011 Share Posted December 20, 2011 I imagine the lawyers will be representing us in the case but it's highly unlikely the will be involved in a business negotiation such as a settlement, they would be involved in tying up the legal side of any deal Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GeneralCartmanLee 313 Posted December 20, 2011 Share Posted December 20, 2011 You're cleary just being a dick for the sake of it. If you have such a handle on things why not educate us all, instead of pointing out that this and that is wrong? Isn't that what educated people do? I'd say it's only tossers that do what you're doing atm.Give me a source then, which bill is Murray paying?Lawyers bill? Tax bill?Hiding away in ambiguity in for fear of being called out and seen as what you earlier called me?I await your response. You won;t have long to wait and I ain't repeating myself, if you think i have said at any point Sir David is paying the tax bill then I see why you are so confused.As i said the tiniest bit of research from you, instead of making up legal rules as you go along, will show you the answers that you seek...now run along, look it up and come back and apologise like i asked you to do 3 pages ago and it would have saved you making a tit of yourself Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
whytes3 254 Posted December 20, 2011 Share Posted December 20, 2011 You won;t have long to wait and I ain't repeating myself, if you think i have said at any point Sir David is paying the tax bill then I see why you are so confused.As i said the tiniest bit of research from you, instead of making up legal rules as you go along, will show you the answers that you seek...now run along, look it up and come back and apologise like i asked you to do 3 pages ago and it would have saved you making a tit of yourselfI don't understand where you are coming form re Murray paying the bill.In selling Rangers he has no responsibility for liabilities, past, present or future as these rest with the business, not the individual owner.No-one in their right mind would sell their business but remain responsible for a liability stemming from that business Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack The Flipper 5,936 Posted December 20, 2011 Share Posted December 20, 2011 You won;t have long to wait and I ain't repeating myself, if you think i have said at any point Sir David is paying the tax bill then I see why you are so confused.As i said the tiniest bit of research from you, instead of making up legal rules as you go along, will show you the answers that you seek...now run along, look it up and come back and apologise like i asked you to do 3 pages ago and it would have saved you making a tit of yourselflol what a retardif murray is paying for the lawyers he is merely injecting a small amount of cash into rangers, that is all that he is doing legally. or if you want it crudely - adding to the capital. it will no doubt be his way of making peace.unless there is a case for lifting the veil - which is entirely unlikely, murray has nothing legally to do with the current liability.it is as simple as that. and it is to me the apology should be coming, but frankly i dont really want one, it would only move me coming from someone i respect... Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mackem09 2 Posted December 20, 2011 Share Posted December 20, 2011 That cunt Mcnally fae the Mirror, was speeling shit about hmrc fiddling the tax payer if they don't hit us hard.They are worried big time.This could be a Merry xmas after all.I've just read McNallys tweets and what a bitter git he is. If an announcement is made prior to next Wednesday then it will be soul destroying for Celtic supporters Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
whytes3 254 Posted December 20, 2011 Share Posted December 20, 2011 I don't understand where you are coming form re Murray paying the bill.In selling Rangers he has no responsibility for liabilities, past, present or future as these rest with the business, not the individual owner.No-one in their right mind would sell their business but remain responsible for a liability stemming from that businessAnd further to that - why would Whyte describe the case being a monkey on our back (or something similar) that needed to be resolved to allow the club to move on if Murray wa son the hook for the bill? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.