MCLACHLAN1 49 Posted April 20, 2012 Share Posted April 20, 2012 Admin say they couldn't raise the £500k for exclusivity bid.Is this true? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gunslinger 270 Posted April 20, 2012 Share Posted April 20, 2012 no they didn't say that. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shane 338 Posted April 20, 2012 Share Posted April 20, 2012 The Blue Knights were set to be offered exclusivity seven days ago but could not immediately raise the £500,000 fee and stepped back from the process.Coming unraveled. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gunslinger 270 Posted April 20, 2012 Share Posted April 20, 2012 yeah that's what was said. was it sky saying it or d & p. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MasterD 7,430 Posted April 20, 2012 Share Posted April 20, 2012 Admin didn't say it. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shane 338 Posted April 20, 2012 Share Posted April 20, 2012 Does it matter? Murray told us they chose not to pay. So who's scuttling whom? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MCLACHLAN1 49 Posted April 20, 2012 Author Share Posted April 20, 2012 There is a massive difference between being able to pay and choosing not to do so and just not being able to raise it.So which is it? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gunslinger 270 Posted April 20, 2012 Share Posted April 20, 2012 well if its ssn then its hardly reliable. if its d & p its perhaps true. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gunslinger 270 Posted April 20, 2012 Share Posted April 20, 2012 immediately. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sasa_Papac_No1_Fan 605 Posted April 20, 2012 Share Posted April 20, 2012 There is a massive difference between being able to pay and choosing not to do so and just not being able to raise it.So which is it?It doesnt matter they backed down because they have no money and GS am not gonna argue am stating facts they needed TICKETUS to fund their bid and they asked for another £500,000 but they said no. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gunslinger 270 Posted April 20, 2012 Share Posted April 20, 2012 not true but believe what you wish. they certainly need ticketus to get a cva and whytes shares. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shane 338 Posted April 20, 2012 Share Posted April 20, 2012 not true but believe what you wish. they certainly need ticketus to get a cva and whytes shares. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gunslinger 270 Posted April 20, 2012 Share Posted April 20, 2012 so is it sky saying it? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shane 338 Posted April 20, 2012 Share Posted April 20, 2012 so is it sky saying it?Gunny, if I spent my time do all of mine and yours leg work, then when would I have time for casey?You know the answer to your question; does nothing to change the implications of their statements. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Broxi 11,433 Posted April 20, 2012 Share Posted April 20, 2012 well if its ssn then its hardly reliable. if its d & p its perhaps true.Well they're 1000x more reliable than you.No offence mate but how anyone thinks your some sort of expert in this is beyond me. You basically just say the exact opposite of what the person in question is saying in public or in a statement, don't back it up and 99% of the time it's something negative. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shane 338 Posted April 20, 2012 Share Posted April 20, 2012 Well they're 1000x more reliable than you.No offence mate but how anyone thinks your some sort of expert in this is beyond me. You basically just say the exact opposite of what the person in question is saying in public or in a statement, don't back it up and 99% of the time it's something negative.Funny that despite his and casey's loud objections, all of my info checked out at the end, including the plans to ring fence assets and pursue a CVA separate the healthy portions of the club, whereas their rhetoric continues to unravel at an alarming rate. Still haven't gotten the apology, might be in the post. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Edmiston Drive 3,846 Posted April 20, 2012 Share Posted April 20, 2012 Funny that despite his and casey's loud objections, all of my info checked out at the end, including the plans to ring fence assets and pursue a CVA separate the healthy portions of the club, whereas their rhetoric continues to unravel at an alarming rate. Still haven't gotten the apology, might be in the post.Heard that before about something.............took 18 months Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gunslinger 270 Posted April 20, 2012 Share Posted April 20, 2012 Well they're 1000x more reliable than you.No offence mate but how anyone thinks your some sort of expert in this is beyond me. You basically just say the exact opposite of what the person in question is saying in public or in a statement, don't back it up and 99% of the time it's something negative.really. what have I got wrong? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gunslinger 270 Posted April 20, 2012 Share Posted April 20, 2012 Funny that despite his and casey's loud objections, all of my info checked out at the end, including the plans to ring fence assets and pursue a CVA separate the healthy portions of the club, whereas their rhetoric continues to unravel at an alarming rate. Still haven't gotten the apology, might be in the post.so you have been proven right have you? he's agreed a cva. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Broxi 11,433 Posted April 20, 2012 Share Posted April 20, 2012 really. what have I got wrong?What have you got right? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Godfather 70,782 Posted April 20, 2012 Share Posted April 20, 2012 No one on here has been right so far, its just a bunch of supporters guessing about bids and while some might have substance I have yet to see a poster be 100% on this.How could they though when you consider its Whyte, Murray, D&P, Ticketus and the rest that are involved in this chess game. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Broxi 11,433 Posted April 20, 2012 Share Posted April 20, 2012 so you have been proven right have you? he's agreed a cva.So he's wrong and your right?Have we been liquidated? At least what he said turned out to be his plan, said so by him and the administrators whereas inevitably you pop up and say they're both lying and it's all a cover up etc etc when it's all guess work based on nothing. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gunslinger 270 Posted April 20, 2012 Share Posted April 20, 2012 What have you got right?ng was pulling out. I was first to say p Murray and co were going to bid. the American wants liquidation.p murrays the better option than whyte last year. what have I not got right. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gunslinger 270 Posted April 20, 2012 Share Posted April 20, 2012 So he's wrong and your right?Have we been liquidated? At least what he said turned out to be his plan, said so by him and the administrators whereas inevitably you pop up and say they're both lying and it's all a cover up etc etc when it's all guess work based on nothing.nope I'm not right on that one yet. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Broxi 11,433 Posted April 20, 2012 Share Posted April 20, 2012 ng was pulling out. I was first to say p Murray and co were going to bid.the American wants liquidation.p murrays the better option than whyte last year. what have I not got right.I'd like to see the posts about the first two and last and your wrong on the third. Miller and admin quite clearly say that he would move assets to a newco while "this" Rangers goes through the process of a CVA and combine the two after, the "old" company survives and doesn't get liquidated. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.