ForeverBlue_Since91 2,895 Posted April 24, 2012 Share Posted April 24, 2012 By STUART BATHGATE Published on Tuesday 24 April 2012 00:32ON A day of fresh drama for Rangers, American businessman Bill Miller moved further ahead in the race to gain control of the club, as administrators Duff & Phelps called his bid “very close to deliverable”.However, Duff & Phelps again said they needed more time before nominating a preferred bidder.Miller, who stepped back from the process on Friday to allow Paul Murray’s Blue Knights consortium more time to put together a rival bid, announced yesterday that he was pressing ahead with his takeover plan as the Knights had not made progress. However, he added that he would not demand to be named preferred bidder at this stage, and was willing to allow the Blue Knights still more time.• Read Bill Miller’s statement in fullDavid Whitehouse of Duff & Phelps – speaking before last night’s developments at Hampden which saw the SFA issue Rangers with a one-year transfer ban and £160,000 fine as well as a lifetime ban and £200,000 fine for owner Craig Whyte – praised the efforts of both parties to formulate an acceptable bid, and confirmed that Murray and his colleagues had yet to make an offer for the club, which was put into administration by Craig Whyte on 14 February.“The Blue Knights are still trying to pull together their bid,” Whitehouse said. “So that we are clear, we have not had a bid on the table from the Blue Knights for us to accept or not.“Bill Miller is seeking to get clarity from the football authorities with regard to a once-and-for-all level of penalties” – that is, points reductions or other punishments of Rangers – “that might apply in the event of him going ahead with his bid.“He was trying to get clarity over the weekend, hasn’t got that yet, but has made some progress. So I would guess, with him, it will be a couple of days. But he has made it clear that he effectively is leaving the door open for the Blue Knights, because he doesn’t want to walk into a hostile takeover scenario. There has been a lot of vitriolic comment from fans’ groups et cetera, in relation to his bid, which from our point of view seems to be ill-informed. There has been a constant e-mail bombardment.”A major concern for both Miller and Murray is the possible reaction of the footballing authorities – both the Scottish Football Association (SFA) and the Scottish Premier League (SPL) – to Rangers’ predicament. Murray’s plan for the club to leave administration via a Company Voluntary Arrangement (CVA) is a straightforward one, readily comprehended by the SPL’s current regulations. But it is unclear how Miller’s proposed ‘hybrid’ of a CVA and a new company would be dealt with by the SPL as things stand.The SPL is meeting next Monday to vote on proposed new penalties for clubs which run into financial trouble, but Whitehouse said he hoped a solution could be found before then. If that hope is realised, he implied, Miller would have made a significant step towards having a workable plan for Rangers.“If it’s deliverable, which it’s very close to being, the Bill Miller bid seems to be a very strong bid for the club,” Whitehouse continued. “Its two requirements are to mitigate – in fact, remove – future footballing penalties, if he can get to that position, and also to provide quite healthy structure moving forward. We haven’t had any assurances from the football authorities on penalties. But we know that they are talking. There is a dialogue.“I would expect and very much hope that it won’t last that long [that is, until 30 April]. It should be done before then. It’s not in our hands to say what penalties he’ll face.“We want to accept a bid as quickly as possible. In so far as delivering to creditors are concerned, we believe that as long as the bids don’t change in terms of quantum, we could deliver either. We are very much in the hands of the bidders to provide unconditional confirmation that they will proceed.”Miller, who planned to have more discussions last night with Rangers manager Ally McCoist, issued a brief statement through the administrators. “After speaking with the administrators today, I understand that no other bidders have stepped up to offer to save Rangers,” he said. “As I stated on Friday, if there were no other bids by close of business Monday, I would begin the process to acquire Rangers according to the plan I outlined on Friday.“At the request of the administrators, I will wait to enter into exclusivity in order to give The Blue Knights/Ticketus more time to put an alternative offer on the table for the administrators to evaluate.“I will leave it to Duff & Phelps to determine when they want to identify their preferred bidder. Until then, I am moving forward with my process and continuing my discussions with all related parties.“I can confirm that I did have confidential conversations with the SFA and PFA Scotland representatives. Finally, I will be having discussions with Ally McCoist later to discuss his recommendations regarding the players.”Miller plans to carve out Ticketus, the company which is owed more than £26 million by Rangers after lending that money in exchange for the revenues from future season-ticket sales. The Blue Knights initially had an agreement with Ticketus to be part of their consortium, but last week Ticketus appeared to have reached an agreement with another bidder, Bill Ng of Singapore.Since Ng withdrew his bid, the Blue Knights and Ticketus have been trying to strike a new deal. That attempt is key to any bid by the Knights meeting with Duff & Phelps’ approval. “Ticketus and the Blue Knights need to reach terms,” Whitehouse added. “And if they can’t before Mr Miller is able to proceed with his bid then we will proceed with his bid.”Whitehouse also sought to allay fears that Miller’s strategy involved liquidation. “It is a newco in the short term, yes. But it wouldn’t involve liquidation. It’s being painted as a liquidation scenario. It isn’t. The business can effectively be ring-fenced whilst a CVA is brought to a conclusion, then brought together in a structure that carries the minimal level of football penalties.“If he can do it before the start of the new season, the 30 April penalties wouldn’t apply. That’s the logic behind it. He doesn’t have to put the two companies back together again before the start of the new season. But the operating company would be in a newco before the start of the new season – and therefore wouldn’t be subject to the sanctions.“His bid is conditional upon him reaching agreement with the authorities. He hasn’t done that yet. So there isn’t a bid on the table today that we can proceed with. I can say that he does seem to be making pretty energetic progress. Best indications are that [a bid] will be during the course of this week, but we will have to see.”Whitehouse warned that time is running out in the bid to haul Rangers out of administration. The club has secure funding until the end of the season, but if a new owner is not found by then, the picture is grim.“We have a short period of time in which the business is effectively funded, which is to the end of the season. Given how extensively this has been marketed, if nobody is prepared to buy the business, we face a pretty bleak future.“What we’ve been saying is that avoiding liquidation is in the gift of the purchasers. It’s only by finding a purchaser and investor will you have avoid liquidation. The fact is that these bidders need to step up. In terms of a timetable, we’re still on schedule to exit through a CVA in time for next season. There comes a point where bidders have had more than adequate opportunities to come up with proposals.“Paul Murray is aware of that and has been working pretty tenaciously to table a bid which we could move to accept. It’s the same with Bill.” Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thermopylae 15,286 Posted April 24, 2012 Share Posted April 24, 2012 If the miller takeover happens and it's the wrong one for the club it will make the sfa problems look like a tea party Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
delparlane 5,659 Posted April 24, 2012 Share Posted April 24, 2012 Whit a bloody saga this all is. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
cstamomusa 3,809 Posted April 24, 2012 Share Posted April 24, 2012 If the miller takeover happens and it's the wrong one for the club it will make the sfa problems look like a tea party Eh! We might not have a club to worry about so I doubt Miller is our biggest worry for now. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shane 338 Posted April 24, 2012 Share Posted April 24, 2012 "Miller played a blinder."-me Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thermopylae 15,286 Posted April 24, 2012 Share Posted April 24, 2012 Eh! We might not have a club to worry about so I doubt Miller is our biggest worry for now.It seems increasingly that all roads lead to that now Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SwallowsHisOwnSpunk 7,798 Posted April 24, 2012 Share Posted April 24, 2012 Eh! We might not have a club to worry about so I doubt Miller is our biggest worry for now.Aye we might not have a club because of Miller, he is going to liquidate us if he get's control so fuck that he is as bad as Murray and Whyte he should be getting hounded never allow him to set foot in Ibrox Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
cstamomusa 3,809 Posted April 24, 2012 Share Posted April 24, 2012 It seems increasingly that all roads lead to that nowI am just not sure what the OP's thread title is meant to achieve, we are all worried but I don't Miller is to blame for any of it (yet). Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thermopylae 15,286 Posted April 24, 2012 Share Posted April 24, 2012 We simply can't afford another whyte ... the best hope is people who care about the club as much as we do Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
cstamomusa 3,809 Posted April 24, 2012 Share Posted April 24, 2012 Aye because of Miller he is going to liquidate us fuck that he is as bad as Murray and WhyteDid he tell you this over a few pints, since you seem to know what he has in mind. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gunslinger 270 Posted April 24, 2012 Share Posted April 24, 2012 good luck to him with the sfa Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ogbg 20 Posted April 24, 2012 Share Posted April 24, 2012 We simply can't afford another whyte ... the best hope is people who care about the club as much as we doMiller seems to have some money at least Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thermopylae 15,286 Posted April 24, 2012 Share Posted April 24, 2012 We know NOTHING about this guy Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
cstamomusa 3,809 Posted April 24, 2012 Share Posted April 24, 2012 good luck to him with the sfa I take it then the TBK are paying the fine, so we are all set with their bid. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ace1 49 Posted April 24, 2012 Share Posted April 24, 2012 Aye we might not have a club because of Miller, he is going to liquidate us if he get's controlSays who? Cos everything I've read & seen quotes of say totally differently! Don't make things up just cos you dont like/understand his plans. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SwallowsHisOwnSpunk 7,798 Posted April 24, 2012 Share Posted April 24, 2012 Did he tell you this over a few pints, since you seem to know what he has in mind.The administrators have more or less confirmed on Clyde it it's common knowledge that his plan is to liquidate us we cannot allow him to do that Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
cstamomusa 3,809 Posted April 24, 2012 Share Posted April 24, 2012 We know NOTHING about this guyWho are all the TBK' s then? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ogbg 20 Posted April 24, 2012 Share Posted April 24, 2012 The administrators have more or less confirmed on Clyde it it's common knowledge that his plan is to liquidate us we cannot allow him to do thatFrom the OP:Whitehouse also sought to allay fears that Miller’s strategy involved liquidation. “It is a newco in the short term, yes. But it wouldn’t involve liquidation. It’s being painted as a liquidation scenario. It isn’t. The business can effectively be ring-fenced whilst a CVA is brought to a conclusion, then brought together in a structure that carries the minimal level of football penalties. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef 436 Posted April 24, 2012 Share Posted April 24, 2012 Aye we might not have a club because of Miller, he is going to liquidate us if he get's control so fuck that he is as bad as Murray and Whyte he should be getting hounded never allow him to set foot in Ibroxthat's more suspicion, pretty warranted with all the latest the club has been put through but you font know that Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
cstamomusa 3,809 Posted April 24, 2012 Share Posted April 24, 2012 The administrators have more or less confirmed on Clyde it it's common knowledge that his plan is to liquidate us we cannot allow him to do thatSo their statement than neither of the two bids mean liquidation was wrong then. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thermopylae 15,286 Posted April 24, 2012 Share Posted April 24, 2012 Who are all the TBK' s then?Well Walter knows them and we trust Walter ... also they have family living here and that makes a big difference if they were thinking of stitching us up Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gunslinger 270 Posted April 24, 2012 Share Posted April 24, 2012 I take it then the TBK are paying the fine, so we are all set with their bid.someone will have to pay the fine. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SwallowsHisOwnSpunk 7,798 Posted April 24, 2012 Share Posted April 24, 2012 So their statement than neither of the two bids mean liquidation was wrong then. oops my mistake I was under the impression that Liquidation and the New Co Route was the same thing if they aren't then what is the difference? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
cstamomusa 3,809 Posted April 24, 2012 Share Posted April 24, 2012 someone will have to pay the fine.Now now that was not what I ask you. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
nvager 498 Posted April 24, 2012 Share Posted April 24, 2012 Miller time looks better than anything else just now. TBKs don't appear to have any funding and are relying on Ticketus and I do not trust them.Staying neutral for now - just want to see us survive. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.