jack1690 793 Posted April 24, 2012 Share Posted April 24, 2012 It's really not that hard to see where our enemies are going. For folk to claim "I read it on a website and it definitely won't happen" is ridiculously naive.1. Tribunal rules that EBTs weren't operated properly and players reasonably believed they had a right to receive payments.2. SPL/SFA scum claim this is equivalent to players having a second contract.3. Therefore players weren't properly registered and we are stripped of titles. Boss, in 1. Did you miss out "If" at the start, or is this a ruling? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
johanhentze 14,073 Posted April 24, 2012 Share Posted April 24, 2012 . Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheBluebells 6,898 Posted April 24, 2012 Share Posted April 24, 2012 UEFA must hav an enquiry into this currupt taigy mob just shut the whole leauge down!UEFA investigating the SFA would be interesting. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheBluebells 6,898 Posted April 24, 2012 Share Posted April 24, 2012 It's really not that hard to see where our enemies are going. For folk to claim "I read it on a website and it definitely won't happen" is ridiculously naive.1. Tribunal rules that EBTs weren't operated properly and players reasonably believed they had a right to receive payments.2. SPL/SFA scum claim this is equivalent to players having a second contract.3. Therefore players weren't properly registered and we are stripped of titles. I hope you're wrong mate, i really do but given what has happened so far i am preparing for the worst Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
johanhentze 14,073 Posted April 24, 2012 Share Posted April 24, 2012 I'm sure they are on record as saying that the new contract is dependent on the OF games. The current deal ends in the summer.I think he was taking the piss. The way it was written, it suggested that Sky would go bust if there was no Rangers. Of course, that's not what the poster meant! Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LegendofCoop 17,245 Posted April 24, 2012 Share Posted April 24, 2012 I think he was taking the piss. The way it was written, it suggested that Sky would go bust if there was no Rangers. Of course, that's not what the poster meant! I'm not so sure, I think he meant No Rangers = No Sky deal? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
johanhentze 14,073 Posted April 24, 2012 Share Posted April 24, 2012 I'm not so sure, I think he meant No Rangers = No Sky deal?I know that's what he meant. What he wrote, on the other hand, was, No Rangers = No Sky. Then the next poster wrote something along the lines of, 'Im not so sure' - taking the piss Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LegendofCoop 17,245 Posted April 24, 2012 Share Posted April 24, 2012 I know that's what he meant. What he wrote, on the other hand, was, No Rangers = No Sky. Then the next poster wrote something along the lines of, 'Im not so sure' - taking the piss FFS , I forgot who I was quoting in the first place!! You are, of course, correct!! Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Right_To_Censor 1,951 Posted April 24, 2012 Share Posted April 24, 2012 30 point deductions, 10 points over 3 seasons, chucked into div 3 and having -75% while spl teams get the rest divided between them, thats doing the rounds in my work, mind you the folk in my work are pretty much women2 stands being closed off Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigBlueDougie 1 Posted April 24, 2012 Share Posted April 24, 2012 i some how doubt thatThe Sky money is paid on the basis that both Rangers and Celtic play in the SPL. No Rangers in the SPL and Sky have the right to pull the plug, they have several clauses in the contract regarding this issue.What other fixture in the SPL is shown 4 times a season? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
johanhentze 14,073 Posted April 24, 2012 Share Posted April 24, 2012 FFS , I forgot who I was quoting in the first place!! You are, of course, correct!! Haha!! 'tis ok, friend! Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Right_To_Censor 1,951 Posted April 24, 2012 Share Posted April 24, 2012 The Sky money is paid on the basis that both Rangers and Celtic play in the SPL. No Rangers in the SPL and Sky have the right to pull the plug, they have several clauses in the contract regarding this issue.What other fixture in the SPL is shown 4 times a season?hearts hibs derby? and if hibs get relegated then that goes out the window. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
boss 1,941 Posted May 7, 2012 Author Share Posted May 7, 2012 David Leggat's blog today reminded me of this thread. We all know it's what the scum want.SPL Closing in on Stripping Rangers of Titleshttp://leggoland2.blogspot.co.uk/ Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ps95v7 387 Posted May 7, 2012 Share Posted May 7, 2012 i'd rather withdraw our membership of the SPL and apply to the SFL Div 3 than accept anymore of this shite. our young guys can take the heat of Div 3 with sanctions, staying in the SPL would be like lap dogs, we are better than that shite, the longer this goes on Div 3 looks likely its time the fans and club took action/quote] Agreed M8 get us out of the SPL we are not for lying downWATP Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dennis 1,011 Posted May 7, 2012 Share Posted May 7, 2012 If what Leggat says is true, the I would expect the war titles that we won to be recognised. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
caseyjones 3,009 Posted May 7, 2012 Share Posted May 7, 2012 If what Leggat says is true, the I would expect the war titles that we won to be recognised. Class. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guardian 4,281 Posted May 7, 2012 Share Posted May 7, 2012 Since all payments were legal at the time, on what basis can anyone strip titles ?How many times can we be punished for the same thing ?Time to say enough is enough, draw a line in the sand and tell them any more shite and we're off.They need to pipe down, tell the tims to shut it and let us get on rebuilding. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheFarmer 260 Posted May 7, 2012 Share Posted May 7, 2012 If what Leggat says is true, the I would expect the war titles that we won to be recognised.They are recognised.It was a different competition during the war though. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
boss 1,941 Posted May 7, 2012 Author Share Posted May 7, 2012 Time to say enough is enoughAt the start of today's meeting, we just need to say that we'll only play in the SPL next year if we have no (significant) sanctions for Administration/newco/EBTs. Otherwise we'll apply for SFL3. Then sit back and enjoy the rest of the meeting. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
boss 1,941 Posted May 7, 2012 Author Share Posted May 7, 2012 They are recognised.By who and in what context? They aren't included in our 54. The 54 already includes different league titles, so why is WWII any different other than Rangers won them all? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
minstral 5,375 Posted May 7, 2012 Share Posted May 7, 2012 At the start of today's meeting, we just need to say that we'll only play in the SPL next year if we have no (significant) sanctions for Administration/newco/EBTs. Otherwise we'll apply for SFL3. Then sit back and enjoy the rest of the meeting.Boss that would be great to do that. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guardian 4,281 Posted May 7, 2012 Share Posted May 7, 2012 At the start of today's meeting, we just need to say that we'll only play in the SPL next year if we have no (significant) sanctions for Administration/newco/EBTs. Otherwise we'll apply for SFL3. Then sit back and enjoy the rest of the meeting.I would pay to see that Sky should cover it, 10 quid to view.We could pay off most of the debt with the income. Both us and the tims would be glued to it. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheFarmer 260 Posted May 7, 2012 Share Posted May 7, 2012 By who and in what context? They aren't included in our 54. The 54 already includes different league titles, so why is WWII any different other than Rangers won them all?Because it was a regional league, not a national league that we won. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gunslinger 270 Posted May 7, 2012 Share Posted May 7, 2012 At the start of today's meeting, we just need to say that we'll only play in the SPL next year if we have no (significant) sanctions for Administration/newco/EBTs. Otherwise we'll apply for SFL3. Then sit back and enjoy the rest of the meeting.while they say don't listen to them no one will buy them and then reduce their revenue so badly.if we say it we sure as hell better mean it. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MosesMcNeil 1,664 Posted May 7, 2012 Share Posted May 7, 2012 At the start of today's meeting, we just need to say that we'll only play in the SPL next year if we have no (significant) sanctions for Administration/newco/EBTs. Otherwise we'll apply for SFL3. Then sit back and enjoy the rest of the meeting.We can only hope that someone is there to put that case on our behalf. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.