Loyal Bear 72 363 Posted May 22, 2012 Share Posted May 22, 2012 From Yahoo SportJohnston urges caution over RangersTue, 22 May 17:21:27 2012 Kilmarnock chairman Michael Johnston has further dampened expectations of heavy sanctions for a newco Rangers in the Scottish Premier League as he highlighted the "substantial penalties" already imposed on the administration-hit Ibrox club.The SPL clubs are due to meet next Wednesday to vote on proposals for sanctions on newco clubs and increased penalties for clubs who go into administration.Charles Green, who is fronting a Rangers ownership consortium, plans to push for a newco if a Company Voluntary Arrangement (CVA) is rejected and there is a feeling among many non-Gers fans that if the club is allowed to remain in the SPL, its forfeit must be heavy.However, SPL chief executive Neil Doncaster has laid the ground for leniency by claiming there is little difference between both exit routes from administration and Johnston has claimed new owners should not be hamstrung by punishments.Rangers have already been fined £160,000 and had a 12-month signing ban imposed on them by the Scottish Football Association for financial irregularities and the loss of their UEFA licence means they miss out on a Champions League qualifying place next season.Speaking to Press Association Sport at Rugby Park after manager Kenny Shiels signed a new two-year deal, Johnston flagged up those sanctions by way of addressing the Rangers dilemma faced by the SPL clubs."I am a solicitor by profession and in terms of the distinction between a CVA and a newco, it can become quite complicated but at the end of the day, from a creditors' point of view, there is maybe no difference," he said."In terms of how it affects a sporting competition, I do share the view and I think the football authorities have traditionally taken the view, that a football club is not to be identified 100% with the people that own it, or the corporate entity that owns it."A football club has its own identity which consists of various components - the history of the club, the stadium, the players but most importantly, the supporters. So you have got to be careful if you are trying to protect a football club which is a very long-standing and historical institution."You have got to be very careful not to come in too heavily with penalties and points deductions or financial penalties going forward which actually put people off investing in that club and trying to make it healthy. After all, it's not the new owners who have done the damage, it is the previous owners." Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ben10 2,257 Posted May 22, 2012 Share Posted May 22, 2012 He's a good cunt, also terrified of a Rangerless SPL. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
nachothelegend 1,932 Posted May 22, 2012 Share Posted May 22, 2012 A man that speaks sense at long last. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
kanjo 26,327 Posted May 22, 2012 Share Posted May 22, 2012 I would be afraid too if i thought one third of my annual clubs income was going to be removed. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Senna 735 Posted May 22, 2012 Share Posted May 22, 2012 Kilmarnock chairman Michael Johnston has further dampened expectations of heavy sanctions for a newco Rangers in the Scottish Premier League...I wonder who was expecting heavy sanctions levelled at us.(I use the word 'wonder' there quite wrongly.)edit: post 6,000. have some tits. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
trueblueal 2,117 Posted May 22, 2012 Share Posted May 22, 2012 Stark contrast to the St J chairman. Probably because Killir are in heavy debt and St J aren't. It's all about looking after number 1 with the SPL Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
elephants stoned 2,994 Posted May 22, 2012 Share Posted May 22, 2012 I agree hes looking out for Kilmarnock, as he should be, but its nice to hear a voice of sanity at last. The St Johnstone chairman on the other hand is dancing to liewells tune, he will change his mind when saints are in admin and bleating to all who will listen. Never Forget Bears Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MosesMcNeil 1,664 Posted May 22, 2012 Share Posted May 22, 2012 "In terms of how it affects a sporting competition, I do share the view and I think the football authorities have traditionally taken the view, that a football club is not to be identified 100% with the people that own it, or the corporate entity that owns it."A football club has its own identity which consists of various components - the history of the club, the stadium, the players but most importantly, the supporters. So you have got to be careful if you are trying to protect a football club which is a very long-standing and historical institution."That's one in the eye for those with an (inexplicable) emotional attachement to the oldco Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sheikh Salim 215 Posted May 22, 2012 Share Posted May 22, 2012 I wonder who was expecting heavy sanctions levelled at us.(I use the word 'wonder' there quite wrongly.)edit: post 6,000. have some tits.I approve of your kindness sir. Have some ass in return. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
OlegKuznetsov 10,816 Posted May 22, 2012 Share Posted May 22, 2012 Nice to hear somebody out with our own speaking some rational sense on the matter.I think we should publicly state that Kilmarnock are off the boycott list. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
islandblue 366 Posted May 22, 2012 Share Posted May 22, 2012 Take it you mean Kilmarnock cos St Johnstone now top of my list Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
caseyjones 3,009 Posted May 22, 2012 Share Posted May 22, 2012 "In terms of how it affects a sporting competition, I do share the view and I think the football authorities have traditionally taken the view, that a football club is not to be identified 100% with the people that own it, or the corporate entity that owns it."A football club has its own identity which consists of various components - the history of the club, the stadium, the players but most importantly, the supporters. So you have got to be careful if you are trying to protect a football club which is a very long-standing and historical institution."That's one in the eye for those with an (inexplicable) emotional attachement to the oldco Agreeing with a hypocritical cunt whose club is in dire straits through overspending. Suits you, sir. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
trueblueal 2,117 Posted May 22, 2012 Share Posted May 22, 2012 Killie and hearts are fucked so that's two votes against. Who else? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gallows high 208 Posted May 22, 2012 Share Posted May 22, 2012 Think killie are off the boycott list and st Johnstone are on it mate Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
trueblueal 2,117 Posted May 22, 2012 Share Posted May 22, 2012 Think killie are off the boycott list and st Johnstone are on it mateNo what I meant was that Killie and Hearts are financially fucked and will vote against heavy sanctions for newcos. Who will join them? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
OlegKuznetsov 10,816 Posted May 22, 2012 Share Posted May 22, 2012 Take it you mean Kilmarnock cos St Johnstone now top of my listGood catch, mate.Can't believe I did that. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MosesMcNeil 1,664 Posted May 22, 2012 Share Posted May 22, 2012 Agreeing with a hypocritical cunt whose club is in dire straits through overspending. Suits you, sir.Not only do I agree with the man - it's easily understood why people like you don't. Suits you. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
caseyjones 3,009 Posted May 22, 2012 Share Posted May 22, 2012 Not only do I agree with the man - it's easily understood why people like you don't. Suits you.People like me? Care to explain? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MosesMcNeil 1,664 Posted May 22, 2012 Share Posted May 22, 2012 People like me? Care to explain?I need no help from you.Figure it out - clever boy that you claim you are. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bad Robot 21,133 Posted May 22, 2012 Share Posted May 22, 2012 I think we need to give credit where credits due instead if bitching why they might be doing it Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
54andcounting 627 Posted May 22, 2012 Share Posted May 22, 2012 My earler thread on this, disappeared like the titanic!!! Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
caseyjones 3,009 Posted May 22, 2012 Share Posted May 22, 2012 Figure it out - clever boy that you claim you are.A shitebag into the bargain. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
southcoastbear 1,639 Posted May 23, 2012 Share Posted May 23, 2012 To me the difference between the reaction from St. Johnstone and Killie chairmen reaction demonstrate who is contemplating relegation from the SPL next year.This may explain part of it, one may also just be a sad, bitter, twisted man prone to extended periods of self abuse. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
caseyjones 3,009 Posted May 23, 2012 Share Posted May 23, 2012 To me the difference between the reaction from St. Johnstone and Killie chairmen reaction demonstrate who is contemplating relegation from the SPL next year.This may explain part of it, one may also just be a sad, bitter, twisted man prone to extended periods of self abuse.One runs his club by balancing the books, the other one is in a heap of shite(plus he's a Bluenose). Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JCDBigBear 10,805 Posted May 23, 2012 Share Posted May 23, 2012 "In terms of how it affects a sporting competition, I do share the view and I think the football authorities have traditionally taken the view, that a football club is not to be identified 100% with the people that own it, or the corporate entity that owns it."A football club has its own identity which consists of various components - the history of the club, the stadium, the players but most importantly, the supporters. So you have got to be careful if you are trying to protect a football club which is a very long-standing and historical institution."That's one in the eye for those with an (inexplicable) emotional attachement to the oldco Johnston has taken a pragmatic view of the situation for Kilmarnock, the SPL, Rangers and Scottish Football in general. In Scotland there are far too many narrow-minded, parochial people who hate to see others do well. It's refreshing for someone to actually come out with a sensible statement. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.