boss 1,941 Posted May 31, 2012 Share Posted May 31, 2012 When you're in a hole of your own making...Stewart, fancy turning up at the Court of Session to tell Lord Glennie that his judgements are mince? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
legalbeagle 3,734 Posted May 31, 2012 Share Posted May 31, 2012 Presumably he would use the same rules to allow Ally McCoist to be machine gunned down in SFA vengeance?What is so unbelievably complicated about asking the people who made up the rules and punishments to apply the damn things? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
paisleyroad 894 Posted May 31, 2012 Share Posted May 31, 2012 he's a clown of the highest order, lapping up all the attention from the Bheasts on twitter tonight FFS Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phil 1,150 Posted May 31, 2012 Share Posted May 31, 2012 The holes just getting bigger Stewart... Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JM1872 3,708 Posted May 31, 2012 Share Posted May 31, 2012 But isn't rule 66 directly linked to "bringing the game into disrepute"? Therefore it would have to be those sanctions available and those alone?If the SFA had any real case I'm sure Lord Glennie would have sided with them. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ricky_ 893 Posted May 31, 2012 Share Posted May 31, 2012 When you're in a hole of your own making...Stewart, fancy turning up at the Court of Session to tell Lord Glennie that his judgements are mince?Article 95: The panel can do whatever it wants, with a complete disregard to the law. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
4MenHadADream 122 Posted May 31, 2012 Share Posted May 31, 2012 I concur Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thommo 708 Posted May 31, 2012 Share Posted May 31, 2012 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bombaybadboy08 15,660 Posted May 31, 2012 Share Posted May 31, 2012 Can you explain that post for us that aren't business minded Phil? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
boss 1,941 Posted May 31, 2012 Author Share Posted May 31, 2012 Can you explain that post for us that aren't business minded Phil?I think Phil's (original) post speaks for itself. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phil 1,150 Posted May 31, 2012 Share Posted May 31, 2012 Bastard wa meant to be a nice wee pic of a guy lost down a hole would have been brilliant as well clearly it didn't work Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
boss 1,941 Posted May 31, 2012 Author Share Posted May 31, 2012 Article 95: The panel can do whatever it wants, with a complete disregard to the law.Exactly. Except Lord Glennie has said, no it can't. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
harry handsome 629 Posted May 31, 2012 Share Posted May 31, 2012 The fact that Regan is prepared to use a social network site to argue his point is beyond me, as the senior employee of the SFA he should have the sense to cancel his twitter account and keep council on anything to do with company business. I would sack any employee of mine for using twitter to update the world on possible issues, after all this is akin to Rangers going through a disciplinary hearing which may or may not end up back in court.The man is clearly a fool and dangerous to the future of Scottish football, how his colleagues and peers can sit back and allow this man to act the way he does is unbelievable. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Raff1690 25 Posted May 31, 2012 Share Posted May 31, 2012 Childish behaviour yet again from that clown, how anyone like that can be in such a position is unreal. Just shows you how much of a mess the sfa are in. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bombaybadboy08 15,660 Posted May 31, 2012 Share Posted May 31, 2012 I think Phil's (original) post speaks for itself. It does indeed Unreal how this clown's mouth is still going when he's made such an arse of things.I think I missed his apology. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jaggytooth 18 Posted May 31, 2012 Share Posted May 31, 2012 Sir Stuart is totally correct on this one. The Lord Glennie only referred it back to the SFA to reconsider, but what if the SFA dont change their decision?Personally, i think we got off lightly and have a cheek complaining! Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
WilliamMunny 3,234 Posted May 31, 2012 Share Posted May 31, 2012 This bitter moron needs to grow up. Do the right thing and walk. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
legalbeagle 3,734 Posted May 31, 2012 Share Posted May 31, 2012 One of his earlier tweets, "Football will deal with football matters". Is a business not paying the inland revenue employee taxes a football matter? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mikhailichenko 90 Posted May 31, 2012 Share Posted May 31, 2012 We have a live one. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phil 1,150 Posted May 31, 2012 Share Posted May 31, 2012 Sir Stuart is totally correct on this one. The Lord Glennie only referred it back to the SFA to reconsider, but what if the SFA dont change their decision?Personally, i think we got off lightly and have a cheek complaining! Personally, I think you have a shite life which revolves around your hatred of the fact that Rangers FC are the most successful team in the world. Ever.Again, personally, I think you should fuck off back to whatever board you and the rest of your manky, inbred, mutant peers use to talk about our team and try getting your sorry state of a life in order Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gaz92 966 Posted May 31, 2012 Share Posted May 31, 2012 I'm not a twitter user, only go on if something big is happening, but went on his twitter when I saw this topic. If the man put as much effort into actually working as he does to getting into squabbles on twitter, he might not be at the centre of one of the biggest laughing stock of an organisation in the world. Just a thought. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
'o'rangerblue 89 Posted May 31, 2012 Share Posted May 31, 2012 Sir Stuart is totally correct on this one. The Lord Glennie only referred it back to the SFA to reconsider, but what if the SFA dont change their decision?Personally, i think we got off lightly and have a cheek complaining! Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
charlene 26 Posted May 31, 2012 Share Posted May 31, 2012 So basically we have an English guy telling a Scottish judge he,s wrong? Regan the cricketer expert is now a lawman!!! this gobshite really should be sent packing,dont think our lords will take to kindly his EXPERT opinion! Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jelavic191 4,422 Posted May 31, 2012 Share Posted May 31, 2012 A man is a position such as his shouldn't be using social network sites like this to discuss his work. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cadman 342 Posted May 31, 2012 Share Posted May 31, 2012 in the Judicial Panel Protocol, under General Disciplinary Rules, there is no Article 95. It goes from Rule 66 (Article 94.1) to Rule 67 (Article 96.1) - you would think he would learn IF IT'S NOT IN THE RULE BOOK IT DOESN'T APPLY Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.