Jump to content

Regan tweets that Lord Glennie is wrong


boss

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 53
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

The fact that Regan is prepared to use a social network site to argue his point is beyond me, as the senior employee of the SFA he should have the sense to cancel his twitter account and keep council on anything to do with company business. I would sack any employee of mine for using twitter to update the world on possible issues, after all this is akin to Rangers going through a disciplinary hearing which may or may not end up back in court.

The man is clearly a fool and dangerous to the future of Scottish football, how his colleagues and peers can sit back and allow this man to act the way he does is unbelievable.

Exactly--here we have the appointed leader of football in Scotland discussing his opinions on official court judgements on f'in TWITTER jeez

If the sight of Neil Lennon was distasteful when he started arguing with fans on TWITTER after Rangers Ibrox victory, then what about Regan acting with even worse impropriety by criticizing the courts judgement in an equally frivolous manner.

If as the leader of Scottish Football he expects us to occasionally accept decisions wrongly made by referees without complaining, and indeed punishing managers and players who choose to do so with fines and suspensions, then you would think the least he could do was to set an example by accepting the decision of a higher authority with the same grace he expects others to do when confronted by his own governing body's decisions

Unfit for purpose, incompetent, possibly corrupt, resign now Regan !

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sir Stuart is totally correct on this one. The Lord Glennie only referred it back to the SFA to reconsider, but what if the SFA dont change their decision?

Personally, i think we got off lightly and have a cheek complaining! ;)

actually bheastie boy, he "set aside" the embargo, meaning, it's a goner.

your right, you did get off lightly, for harbouring a peado and contniually shaming the country by desecrating the memory of our war dead.

Link to post
Share on other sites

in the Judicial Panel Protocol, under General Disciplinary Rules, there is no Article 95. It goes from Rule 66 (Article 94.1) to Rule 67 (Article 96.1) - you would think he would learn IF IT'S NOT IN THE RULE BOOK IT DOESN'T APPLY :wanker:

You make a valid point - which is for going to be relevant in the future if/when we are charged for going to court ;) .

The Rule numbers in the JPP refer to the Article numbers. Not all Articles are covered by Rules in the JPP list of sanctions, including some that Regan would wish to use. Interesting times ahead. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

dont know what you're on about, im as much of a bluenose as you! Just see things for what they are.

We got caught lying , cheating and coning our way to 54 tainted titles and should be ashamed of ourselves!

We should start a campaign to hand back every trophy since Moonbeams, er i mean Murray took over!

You away back to the steaming pile of shite you were rolling about in. Lying is a sin you're priest won't be gentle bhoy.

Link to post
Share on other sites

dont know what you're on about, im as much of a bluenose as you! Just see things for what they are.

Bye - you're history.

Have a nice life, you rabid mhank who's utterly obsessed with The Rangers - the world's most successful football club.

Link to post
Share on other sites

He didn't say Lord Glennie was wrong, just that the SFA are right.

It is all very well doing it on Twitter, lets see him say the same in a court of Scottish law.

The sooner this clown is removed the better, not just for Rangers, but Scottish football as well.

Link to post
Share on other sites

dont know what you're on about, im a raging pedo tim! Just see things for what they are.

celtic got caught lying , cheating and shagging wee boys during our tainted titles and should be ashamed of ourselves!

We should start a campaign to hand back every trophy since big Jock kept quiet!

agreed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

5lea1k.jpg

When you're in a hole of your own making...

Stewart, fancy turning up at the Court of Session to tell Lord Glennie that his judgements are mince?

So he basically means they can do what they want depending how much they hate a member club.

The whole thing is a joke from top to bottom.They talk about the integrity of the game and the league but where was their integrity when they took Liewells tour of Japan shite for fact and didn't give us a break before our UEFA cup final yet Celtic got 10 days in 2003.

Where is their integrity when they threaten closure of Ibrox and fines for songs while Celtic hold up pro IRA banners,death threats to Rangers players and sectarian pro IRA chanting.

Where is their integrity when Referee's are threatened and publicly ridiculed by the Celtic management team and boardroom?

Where is their integrity when they are meant to veto and takeover yet let Whyte slip by then try to put the blame solely on us.The list goes on and on.

Link to post
Share on other sites

What the fuck is Campbell Ogilvie doing with regards to regan discussing all this in public, surely rules have to be in place with the sfa to stop employees doing this..................would not be surprised if regan has been using the works pc to go on the porn sites.............now I cannot say this is fact or even if it's homo porn or straight porn.

Get his hard drive checked now sfa.

Don't just just love the Glaswegian humouruk.gif

Link to post
Share on other sites

What the fuck is Campbell Ogilvie doing with regards to regan discussing all this in public, surely rules have to be in place with the sfa to stop employees doing this..................would not be surprised if regan has been using the works pc to go on the porn sites.............now I cannot say this is fact or even if it's homo porn or straight porn.

Get his hard drive checked now sfa.

Don't just just love the Glaswegian humouruk.gif

I was actually thinking that,most companies have policies jn place that mean they can't discuss work matters outside of work wether on social networks or with friends,it's usually fairly frowned upon.

Also it a bit hypocritical of him to say this about judges decisions yet players and managers alike would be hammered for doing likewise toward any sfa decision they don't agree with.......

Link to post
Share on other sites

Regan fails to understand why he is wrong.

A business that requires to buy and sell players

In order to continue trading... and he takes that away? No wonder a court of law deemed the ruling illegal <cr>

"deemed fit" - If the SFA said death to all Rangers employees, would he have the same argument? <cr>

Link to post
Share on other sites

Regan fails to understand why he is wrong.

A business that requires to buy and sell players

In order to continue trading... and he takes that away? No wonder a court of law deemed the ruling illegal <cr>

"deemed fit" - If the SFA said death to all Rangers employees, would he have the same argument? <cr>

The last company I seen go into Admin was Clinton cards, could you imagine hallmark lobbied the birthday and greetings cards association who then hammered them with a, no buying of any cards sanction?? Of course its a restriction of trade and a shocking one at that!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I was actually thinking that,most companies have policies jn place that mean they can't discuss work matters outside of work wether on social networks or with friends,it's usually fairly frowned upon.

Also it a bit hypocritical of him to say this about judges decisions yet players and managers alike would be hammered for doing likewise toward any sfa decision they don't agree with.......

He looks and acts like a no mark , you is suddenly in the spotlight.

The man has no class

Link to post
Share on other sites

5lea1k.jpg

When you're in a hole of your own making...

Stewart, fancy turning up at the Court of Session to tell Lord Glennie that his judgements are mince?

When it comes to who out of the two is best at distinguishing normative propositions of Law, and Regulatory practices, my money is on Lord Glennie.

Link to post
Share on other sites

When it comes to who out of the two is best at distinguishing normative propositions of Law, and Regulatory practices, my money is on Lord Glennie.

One could be persuaded to put money on Regan. For his head. On a platter. Figuratively. :craphead:

(Note for plod - that was a joke, hence the emoticon...)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Upcoming Events

    • 28 April 2024 11:30 Until 13:30
      0  
      St Mirren v Rangers
      The SMiSA Stadium
      Scottish Premiership
      Live on Sky Sports Main Event and Sky Sports Football

×
×
  • Create New...