King Jela 20,361 Posted June 1, 2012 Share Posted June 1, 2012 Would rather have Falcao myself. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
polishranger 98 Posted June 1, 2012 Share Posted June 1, 2012 I think Hulk is actually a bit underrated. Yeah, everybody knows he scores a lot, but actually his assist numbers are what impresses me the most about him: season 10/11 - 21 ast, 11/12 - 15 ast. To compare, Falcao had 7 assist in 11/12 season, Rooney 8, Gomez 4, Kagawa 9, Xavi 12, Iniesta 12. Great pickup Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
alstone 374 Posted June 1, 2012 Share Posted June 1, 2012 I think he's great, hope chelsea can challenge the 2 manchester clubs next season - can see them lagging a fair bit behind though for some reason!! Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Godfather 71,872 Posted June 1, 2012 Share Posted June 1, 2012 That doesn't make sense he won the CL with lowly Porto where he had all the reins of power why would any owner want to change that?Just the way some of them work, shevchenko was a step too far for Jose though.It has continued with Torres, Hazard and Hulk. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Godfather 71,872 Posted June 1, 2012 Share Posted June 1, 2012 Would rather have Falcao myself.Me too although Hulk can play 2 positions so that probably swung it. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chambo 197 Posted June 1, 2012 Share Posted June 1, 2012 Would rather have Falcao myself.I think Falcao is a better goal scorer and maybe would have been a direct replacement for Drogba however Hulk is a really good signing and along with Hazard and whoever else they may sign i'm quite excited about watching Chelsea next season even though i'm not a great fan of them. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
50ShadesofBlue 667 Posted June 1, 2012 Share Posted June 1, 2012 City and Chelsea two horse race next season. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Godfather 71,872 Posted June 1, 2012 Share Posted June 1, 2012 City and Chelsea two horse race next season.It certainly leaves the likes of Arsenal and Liverpool miles behind now. The 2 Manchester clubs and Chelsea look so much better equipped than the rest now especially when players like Hazard and Hulk go to Chelsea and Kagawa going to United. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Creampuff 22,628 Posted June 1, 2012 Share Posted June 1, 2012 Hazard Mata HulkTorres Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NessFTW 40 Posted June 1, 2012 Share Posted June 1, 2012 Well you certainy can't accuse them of a lack of ambition, can't wait to see these guys in premiership next year Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
WilliamFyfe 1,438 Posted June 1, 2012 Share Posted June 1, 2012 Can't wait to see him and Hazzard next season Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ferdasyn 431 Posted June 1, 2012 Share Posted June 1, 2012 Hazard, Hulk, and Marin have cost Chelsea £2 million more than Carroll, Downing and Henderson cost Liverpool.Incredible. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
G.E.C. 18,753 Posted June 1, 2012 Share Posted June 1, 2012 Nope, players have been and continue to be bought regardless of the managers consent. They may earmark certain ones and bring them too.It's not uncommon at clubs where the owners pump in billions.Mourinho signed a few Porto players that won the CL in his first season. Surely that was his signings? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueSuedeSambas 53,775 Posted June 1, 2012 Share Posted June 1, 2012 The only players who Chelsea have signed that have made me really think they were probably signed by Abramovich rather than the manager are Smertin, Shevchenko & Zhirkov. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Godfather 71,872 Posted June 1, 2012 Share Posted June 1, 2012 Mourinho signed a few Porto players that won the CL in his first season. Surely that was his signings?He signed a few but also RA sanctioned a fair few which Jose did not agree with which was why there was so much friction with them. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Godfather 71,872 Posted June 1, 2012 Share Posted June 1, 2012 The only players who Chelsea have signed that have made me really think they were probably signed by Abramovich rather than the manager are Smertin, Shevchenko & Zhirkov.Torres was defiantly a RA signing I think while Lukaku, the Belgian Keeper and De Bruyne were stated as RA signings as AVB said this was a method which was important to the club, there was an article at the time of the De Bruyne singing. Chelsea manager Andre Villas-Boas had insisted the arrival of De Bruyne was nothing to do with him and that it was down to "club policy for the future". He explained: "It's a target that's decided by the club, that I knew about for quite some time. "In the sense that it's the club policy for the future, it's the right thing [to buy him] and I'll do everything in my power for him to reach maximum potential. "But it's down to the club in decision-making. I'm a manager who respects club policy. "A club has to look to the future, whether it's with this manager or another. He's a good bet for the future." Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SwallowsHisOwnSpunk 7,798 Posted June 1, 2012 Share Posted June 1, 2012 If Chelsea were to sign a top quality RB or CB (Hummels, Sakho, Silva, Alves) then I could see them winning the league they do't need another out and out striker Torres, Hulk, Sturridge and Lukaku are more than good enough options and with Marin, Mata, Hazard, De Bruyne, Kalou and Malouda behind them they will be a superb attacking side they just need to add some quality defenders. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Daniel Amokachi 14 Posted June 1, 2012 Share Posted June 1, 2012 Ramires LampardHulk------Mata------HazardTorresNot bad.Need a RB IMO.The main thing Chelsea need is a whole new central midfield. Looking awesome attack wise but Ramires is a sort of bit part utility player and Lampard, some key passes in the CL apart, is a shadow of the player he was. I honestly think they need at least 2 world class central midfielders as a bare minimum. Essien is finished as well. Say Chelsea went out and signed Snieidjer and De Rossi for example (not going to happen I know), they would walk the league next year Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the goal machine 7,801 Posted June 1, 2012 Share Posted June 1, 2012 Hulk is a big improvement on Sturridge on the right hand side of attack. Both are left footed, and cut on and shoot but Hulk is a lot better at it than Sturridge although Sturridge is very talented. Good signing. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gazza27 15,283 Posted June 1, 2012 Share Posted June 1, 2012 Ramires LampardHulk------Mata------HazardTorresNot bad.Need a RB IMO.4 defenders and a goalie going on that Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
messiah10 58 Posted June 2, 2012 Share Posted June 2, 2012 Gregory Van Der Weil is in talks apparently.hope this is true, he is class Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
messiah10 58 Posted June 2, 2012 Share Posted June 2, 2012 The main thing Chelsea need is a whole new central midfield. Looking awesome attack wise but Ramires is a sort of bit part utility player and Lampard, some key passes in the CL apart, is a shadow of the player he was. I honestly think they need at least 2 world class central midfielders as a bare minimum. Essien is finished as well. Say Chelsea went out and signed Snieidjer and De Rossi for example (not going to happen I know), they would walk the league next yearramires is a bit part utilty player hahahadid u watch any of the last season, chelseas best player Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillyBoy11 63 Posted June 2, 2012 Share Posted June 2, 2012 ramires is a bit part utilty player hahahadid u watch any of the last season, chelseas best player Spot On.Ramires and Scott Brown would compliment that attacking 5 perfectly. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
derek1872 548 Posted June 2, 2012 Share Posted June 2, 2012 Very good player but in all honesty not as good as Drogba so i dont see this as a big strenghten of the squad. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
waltzer83 27 Posted June 3, 2012 Share Posted June 3, 2012 Have chelsea actually got him? He's playing for brazil just now and he has been chronic! Never worth 38 million all he does is shoot from anywhere and he's rotten at that too Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.