DaleFo8 Posted June 25, 2012 Share Posted June 25, 2012 Right, basically I was talking to a few boys after work about the Naismith and Whittaker situation, and it came up that when the players took a wage cut, loads of them got a release fee clause added to their contracts.What I can't understand then, is why all the players would not just allow their contracts to be moved over to the newco, and then they could be sold on to at least make us some money. Especially Naismith. After all we've done for him when he was injured and since he is supposed to be a Rangers fan, and with teams sniffing around him, surely he could have agreed?Does this make any sense, or am I just being too simple, or missing something? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
elephants stoned Posted June 25, 2012 Share Posted June 25, 2012 Signing on fees, if they transfered over we could claim a small fee, by not transfering they get a signing on fee that would have gone to Rangers. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DaleFo8 Posted June 25, 2012 Author Share Posted June 25, 2012 Signing on fees, if they transfered over we could claim a small fee, by not transfering they get a signing on fee that would have gone to Rangers.Ahh, so it's total greed then, cheers for clearing that up Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RFCstuart Posted June 25, 2012 Share Posted June 25, 2012 Ahh, so it's total greed then, cheers for clearing that up Exactly. Took advantage of the situation to benefit their own pockets. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
A.T.G Posted June 25, 2012 Share Posted June 25, 2012 Guys guys guysPlease, they had no choice, they don't owe the newco anything (us fans and Ally etc etc)It is nothing to do with them being traitor cunty greedy disloyal wee fucking bastards Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
elephants stoned Posted June 25, 2012 Share Posted June 25, 2012 Ahh, so it's total greed then, cheers for clearing that up Sadly yes. I exspected Whittaker to do this but not Naismith, McCabe thinks hes alot better than he is and Sone i wish all the best to, he was out of contract and did pay to play for us at first so he is the only 1 so far im left with any respect for Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Muirheadbear Posted June 25, 2012 Share Posted June 25, 2012 Both players feel that there transfer fees are going to benefit investors rather than the club.Remember Naisy waived his signing on fee and gave it back to Killie when he joined Rangers 400ki believe so he doesn't seem the greedy type.He simply doesn't want the pish ripped out of him twice in the space of two months by venture capitalists. So who can blame him? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.