julescotia 11,407 Posted July 25, 2012 Share Posted July 25, 2012 almost every one of your posts are reeking of bheast.I concur.A -18 rep and he's been a member for less than 24hrs.Also his name seems to be a play on the tick tock shit they were spouting. I for one would punt him outta here. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
delamonty 992 Posted July 25, 2012 Share Posted July 25, 2012 Thing is.. Without OF matches, the TV contract has to be a fraction of the 'old' one? So the SPL pay for some media rights for a relatively minor pot of money? Need the details on all this... but no stripping of titles? Well done Charles Green and co (if indeed that is the case). Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gogzy 31,195 Posted July 25, 2012 Share Posted July 25, 2012 I concur.A -18 rep and he's been a member for less than 24hrs.Also his name seems to be a play on the tick tock shit they were spouting. I for one would punt him outta here.go on his profile and check his post history, its ugly viewing. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rfc#1. 1,877 Posted July 25, 2012 Share Posted July 25, 2012 "Seriously? I find sky full of ads except the movie channels. But that's my experience. "--To use someone else's turn of phrase; along with the internet also came Sky+Yeah that's ok if your using time shift but if not you can't fast forward the adverts. I have sky+Hd. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
WillWard 6 Posted July 25, 2012 Share Posted July 25, 2012 Really, well do tell us the correct numbers then to keep things right.I don't know what they are either but I'm not randomly pulling them from my arse Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
joker69 60 Posted July 25, 2012 Share Posted July 25, 2012 go on his profile and check his post history, its ugly viewing.He was already outed on another thread board is reeking again Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
stevotrueblue 382 Posted July 25, 2012 Share Posted July 25, 2012 I dont mind them getting some of the media cash if we keep all our titles and they have agreed 100% to drop all pursuit. We would have had to divide up what was coming into the SFL by 30 clubs anyway ,, so it wouldnt have been much.I know the principle may feel a little tarnished,,, but how bad will the tims feel if we keep ALL our titles,,and they will feel the "establishment " sold them out again,,, just wait for it. TIMPLOSION IF THIS IS TRUE WILL BE AN UNDERSTATEMENT. The_Blue_Flash 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlCapone 7,678 Posted July 25, 2012 Share Posted July 25, 2012 I don't know what they are either but I'm not randomly pulling them from my arse My point proved, you dont know.Lets just say its my job to know the figures Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bazzl82 2 Posted July 25, 2012 Share Posted July 25, 2012 No doubt there will be another three man protest at hampden about this from they yahoos Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
WillWard 6 Posted July 25, 2012 Share Posted July 25, 2012 My point proved, you dont know.Lets just say its my job to know the figures So instead of holding your hand up and admitting you were simply making it up you are going to insist that Sky losing rights to the EPL would mean 90%+ of their total subscribers leaving while losing the SPL rights would result in less than 1% doing the same? If you do this for a living I hope your CV is up to date TreyU 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Al 55 9,248 Posted July 25, 2012 Share Posted July 25, 2012 Yeah that's ok if your using time shift but if not you can't fast forward the adverts.Yes but that's not exactly difficult to manage is it? Record sky, stv, etc and watch bbc or film or footie, you never need to watch an advert again; 1hr programs are actually 40ish minutes, think how much of your life is wasted watching adverts. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
sergio 1,199 Posted July 25, 2012 Share Posted July 25, 2012 I can imagine we'll probably hear something at the close of play today.Aye ... this Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Redmond7 979 Posted July 25, 2012 Share Posted July 25, 2012 I dont mind them getting some of the media cash if we keep all our titles and they have agreed 100% to drop all pursuit. We would have had to divide up what was coming into the SFL by 30 clubs anyway ,, so it wouldnt have been much.I know the principle may feel a little tarnished,,, but how bad will the tims feel if we keep ALL our titles,,and they will feel the "establishment " sold them out again,,, just wait for it. TIMPLOSION IF THIS IS TRUE WILL BE AN UNDERSTATEMENT. Yeah and then the campaign is stepped up to have them stripped of titles during the sex abuse years and the Erskine Bridge will need to be closed for these poor buggers jumping off Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
krissg910 110 Posted July 25, 2012 Share Posted July 25, 2012 its tim for meltdown!!!!!someone call in the army!!!!giruy feenian cunts The_Blue_Flash 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peasie 103 Posted July 25, 2012 Share Posted July 25, 2012 Right guysIs this a good thing for us re tv rights??What does it mean for us , what does it mean for other SPL teams ??Well - it means Rangers get to play next season - so that's a good thing.It means Sky doesn't rip up the contract they still have for this season even if it is reduced substantially. So that's good for the SPL. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
nelsonRFC82 305 Posted July 25, 2012 Share Posted July 25, 2012 Yeah and then the campaign is stepped up to have them stripped of titles during the sex abuse years and the Erskine Bridge will need to be closed for these poor buggers horrible cunts jumping off Fixed that for you! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
OneDavidCooper 2,505 Posted July 25, 2012 Share Posted July 25, 2012 No Rangers fan should have paid for sky in the last 3/4 years, but they do, and still do. Sadly the internet militant is a small minority. Nothing but blackmail this and we just accept it, then we wonder why they walk all over us.What has it got to do with you what fellow fans watch on TV? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Redmond7 979 Posted July 25, 2012 Share Posted July 25, 2012 Fixed that for you! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
OneDavidCooper 2,505 Posted July 25, 2012 Share Posted July 25, 2012 So rangers to play 45 games next season ? :lol: Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JCDBigBear 10,824 Posted July 25, 2012 Share Posted July 25, 2012 So instead of holding your hand up and admitting you were simply making it up you are going to insist that Sky losing rights to the EPL would mean 90%+ of their total subscribers leaving while losing the SPL rights would result in less than 1% doing the same? If you do this for a living I hope your CV is up to date Al Capone is pretty near the mark on this. Most Scottish subscribers with the sports package pay to see the EPL and La Liga. If the EPL wasn't broadcast most Scottish Sky viewers would cancel the sports package. When you pay Sky for the sports package you are funding the EPL not the SPL. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
OneDavidCooper 2,505 Posted July 25, 2012 Share Posted July 25, 2012 Beside the fact that paying £500+ a year for any tv that carries advertising is stupid, sky have been underpaying for Scottish football for years. A team that gets relegated from the epl gets 10/20 times as much as the Scottish champions. Sky makes plenty from Scottish football, and give us buttons in return. As for missing your 5-6 games a week, then aye its a small price to pay to get a better deal instead of scrambling for the scraps. Besides, you can get anything that you can see on sky on this amazing new invention called the internet.Total shite. I'm not watching football on a pc screen and I'm not going to give up Sky when it will make fuck all impact anyway. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
islandblue 366 Posted July 25, 2012 Share Posted July 25, 2012 Has the transfer embargo been dropped? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ForeverBlue_Since91 2,895 Posted July 25, 2012 Share Posted July 25, 2012 So has been granted or not? Not reading through 7 pages. Quiet Jim 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
delamonty 992 Posted July 25, 2012 Share Posted July 25, 2012 Has the transfer embargo been dropped?Doubt that mate. Pretty sure it stands from Sept 1-Aug 31.. Meaning we can sign players in this window but then nothing until Jan, 2014. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
StevieMac90 65 Posted July 25, 2012 Share Posted July 25, 2012 amazing how much anxiety a wee rumour can cause. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts