Jump to content

Rangers/Elgin versus Hibs/Hearts (tv figures)


Peasie

Recommended Posts

Figures for week ending Sunday 2nd December (Scottish Cup weekend) show 291,000 watched Rangers v Elgin City and 124,000 watched Hibs v Hearts. (An improvement of 99,000 on the 25,000 that watched the league match).

129,000 watched the midweek league game between Hearts and Celtic. Last season this match (both venues) had 303,000, 242,000 and 205,000 viewers. 183,000 watched the match at Torbett Towers earlier this season. Should be pointed out all these earlier games were weekend games on Sky compared to a midweek game on ESPN.

Figures from http://www.barb.co.uk/viewing/weekly-top-10?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Figures for week ending Sunday 2nd December (Scottish Cup weekend) show 291,000 watched Rangers v Elgin City and 124,000 watched Hibs v Hearts. (An improvement of 99,000 on the 25,000 that watched the league match).

129,000 watched the midweek league game between Hearts and Celtic. Last season this match (both venues) had 303,000, 242,000 and 205,000 viewers. 183,000 watched the match at Torbett Towers earlier this season. Should be pointed out all these earlier games were weekend games on Sky compared to a midweek game on ESPN.

Figures from http://www.barb.co.uk/viewing/weekly-top-10?

So basically, it's apples and oranges?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Figures for week ending Sunday 2nd December (Scottish Cup weekend) show 291,000 watched Rangers v Elgin City and 124,000 watched Hibs v Hearts. (An improvement of 99,000 on the 25,000 that watched the league match).

129,000 watched the midweek league game between Hearts and Celtic. Last season this match (both venues) had 303,000, 242,000 and 205,000 viewers. 183,000 watched the match at Torbett Towers earlier this season. Should be pointed out all these earlier games were weekend games on Sky compared to a midweek game on ESPN.

Figures from http://www.barb.co.u.../weekly-top-10?

what is it you're trying to show here?

Link to post
Share on other sites

what is it you're trying to show here?

The fact that the game that was supposed to replace the "Old Firm" game and the game that all the diddy club teams were bigging it up like it was a huge rivalry yet it is still living in the shadow of a 3rd division Rangers game. Also it also proves that Celtic are a smaller club than us we have many more fans watching our games both on TV and in our respective stadiums.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The fact that the game that was supposed to replace the "Old Firm" game and the game that all the diddy club teams were bigging it up like it was a huge rivalry yet it is still living in the shadow of a 3rd division Rangers game. Also it also proves that Celtic are a smaller club than us we have many more fans watching our games both on TV and in our respective stadiums.

(tu)

Link to post
Share on other sites

The fact that the game that was supposed to replace the "Old Firm" game and the game that all the diddy club teams were bigging it up like it was a huge rivalry yet it is still living in the shadow of a 3rd division Rangers game. Also it also proves that Celtic are a smaller club than us we have many more fans watching our games both on TV and in our respective stadiums.

You can't compare figures for games played at different times, on different days, on different channels and also failing to take into account what was taking place at the same time on other channels.

Until those figures can be gathered, there can be no proper comparison.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The fact that the game that was supposed to replace the "Old Firm" game and the game that all the diddy club teams were bigging it up like it was a huge rivalry yet it is still living in the shadow of a 3rd division Rangers game. Also it also proves that Celtic are a smaller club than us we have many more fans watching our games both on TV and in our respective stadiums.

Ah I see I couldn't see what he was trying to show. Wether it was more watch us or less have started watching them or even that sky have more viewers than ESPN.

Us being in the 3rd division is irrelavant. We had more viewers and a higher percentage of people going to our games per seats well before this season

Link to post
Share on other sites

You can't compare figures for games played at different times, on different days, on different channels and also failing to take into account what was taking place at the same time on other channels.

Until those figures can be gathered, there can be no proper comparison.

What you are looking for casey is for two games to be on sky at the same time.

Fact is no matter which it is getting more people are tuning in to watch Rangers. This is consistent throughout the season to date.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Upcoming Events

    No upcoming events found
×
×
  • Create New...