OlegKuznetsov 10,816 Posted December 11, 2012 Share Posted December 11, 2012 Players distance themselves from Rangers employment tribunal claimhttp://sport.stv.tv/football/clubs/rangers/205351-players-distance-themselves-from-rangers-employment-tribunal-claim/?Current and former Rangers players have moved to distance themselves from employment tribunal claims that have been raised against the club.A share prospectus issued by the Ibrox club on Friday revealed that two separate cases had been opened against Rangers relating to the transfer of player contracts when Charles Green’s consortium bought assets from the old company.The prospectus said that union PFA Scotland had raised a claim on behalf of 67 players complaining that Rangers old and newco had not correctly explained the transfer of contracts under TUPE rules.McCulloch, currently captain of Rangers, took to Twitter to say that he had no involvement with the action being raised against the club.“For everyone asking, I'm not involved in the 67 people and if my name is there it will be getting taken off,” he tweeted.PFA Scotland have declined to comment.Wylde was one of the first players to leave Ibrox after Rangers appointed administrators earlier this year. The winger, who later signed for Bolton Wanderers, said that he was uncomfortable with taking a wage while redundancies were a possibility at the club.Though no longer a Rangers player, Wylde also used Twitter to deny any involvement.He said: “For all those Rangers fans asking, no, I am not involved. Cannot believe someone would want to do that.”The Rangers share prospectus also detailed a separate claim from Sone Aluko, Kyle Lafferty and Jamie Ness, stating that the three were claiming “constructive dismissal” at Ibrox when they left before signing with other clubs.Aluko claimed to have no knowledge of the claim on Monday evening, tweeting: “Generic response to so many tweets to. Can't explain something I wasn't aware of till u all started tweeting me about it!! Will find out.” Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ace 3,645 Posted December 11, 2012 Share Posted December 11, 2012 Current and former Rangers players have moved to distance themselves from employment tribunal claims that have been raised against the club.A share prospectus issued by the Ibrox club on Friday revealed that two separate cases had been opened against Rangers relating to the transfer of player contracts when Charles Green’s consortium bought assets from the old company.The prospectus said that union PFA Scotland had raised a claim on behalf of 67 players complaining that Rangers old and newco had not correctly explained the transfer of contracts under TUPE rules.McCulloch, currently captain of Rangers, took to Twitter to say that he had no involvement with the action being raised against the club.“For everyone asking, I'm not involved in the 67 people and if my name is there it will be getting taken off,” he tweeted.PFA Scotland have declined to comment.Wylde was one of the first players to leave Ibrox after Rangers appointed administrators earlier this year. The winger, who later signed for Bolton Wanderers, said that he was uncomfortable with taking a wage while redundancies were a possibility at the club.Though no longer a Rangers player, Wylde also used Twitter to deny any involvement.He said: “For all those Rangers fans asking, no, I am not involved. Cannot believe someone would want to do that.”The Rangers share prospectus also detailed a separate claim from Sone Aluko, Kyle Lafferty and Jamie Ness, stating that the three were claiming “constructive dismissal” at Ibrox when they left before signing with other clubs.Aluko claimed to have no knowledge of the claim on Monday evening, tweeting: “Generic response to so many tweets to. Can't explain something I wasn't aware of till u all started tweeting me about it!! Will find out.”http://sport.stv.tv/football/clubs/rangers/205351-players-distance-themselves-from-rangers-employment-tribunal-claim/ Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ace 3,645 Posted December 11, 2012 Share Posted December 11, 2012 It is beggining to appear that the SPFA have overstepped their bounds by taking action on behalf of players, without actually checking with the players themselves fi they wanted this to happen.Certainly raises questions over the SPFA ethics, wonder how Fraser Wishart, a man I have alot of time for, will explain this? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ace 3,645 Posted December 11, 2012 Share Posted December 11, 2012 Beat you to it ... i think Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
OlegKuznetsov 10,816 Posted December 11, 2012 Author Share Posted December 11, 2012 Beat you to it ... i thinkI think not.... OlegKuznetsovOleg KuznetsovSite Writer15,457 posts0 warning pointsGender:MalePosted Today, 01:32 PM Ace51 Cards Short of a Full DeckTrue Blue7,935 postsGender:MaleLocation:CastlemilkPosted Today, 01:33 PMSorry, that was childish, but since you mentioned it. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Straight-Edge-Loyal 6,700 Posted December 11, 2012 Share Posted December 11, 2012 It is beggining to appear that the SPFA have overstepped their bounds by taking action on behalf of players, without actually checking with the players themselves fi they wanted this to happen.Certainly raises questions over the SPFA ethics, wonder how Fraser Wishart, a man I have alot of time for, will explain this?Hard to believe someone who once played for us could cause us so much damage traitors excepted obviously. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bad Robot 21,513 Posted December 11, 2012 Share Posted December 11, 2012 I wonder when we get a statement from Fraser or the SPFA? 48 hours anyone, now where have I heard that before... Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ace 3,645 Posted December 11, 2012 Share Posted December 11, 2012 I think not....Sorry, that was childish, but since you mentioned it.Not childish at all ... lol Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bad Robot 21,513 Posted December 11, 2012 Share Posted December 11, 2012 THE Scottish Professional Footballers Association is set to make a statement this afternoon outlining their legal bid to claim wages for 67 Rangers players following the summer's Ibrox crisis.The club face a potential employment tribunal in relation to an alleged failure to inform and consult over the transfer of contracts from the old company to Charles Green's new company.Record Sport revealed this morning how 18 current players have been caught up in the wrangle with Lee McCulloch stating his desire to distance himself from any employment tribunal.Former Ibrox players Sone Aluko, Kyle Lafferty and Jamie Ness have raised separate constructive dismissal claims.Rangers lawyers' believe Green's case is watertight but the SPFA bosses have raised an employment tribunal claim and will make a statement this afternoon.http://www.<No links to this website>/sport/football/football-news/spfa-set-to-make-statement-on-rangers-1484542 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
rubyred90 118 Posted December 11, 2012 Share Posted December 11, 2012 Am i missing something here?The claim is for partly not being informed of what was happening i gather?And now without even informing the players the union has raised this claim? someone tell me im wrong Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
georgemcdonald9 5 Posted December 11, 2012 Share Posted December 11, 2012 If there's. Not a story in record. Tomorrow. About today's. Story. Being a load of pissh am finished. With that paper Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Godfather 76,003 Posted December 11, 2012 Share Posted December 11, 2012 If there's. Not a story in record. Tomorrow. About today's. Story. Being a load of pissh am finished. With that paperIf you are not already finished with the Record then words fail me mate. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
trueblueal 2,117 Posted December 11, 2012 Share Posted December 11, 2012 That was. Hard to. Read. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
linfield1690 4,249 Posted December 11, 2012 Share Posted December 11, 2012 Am i missing something here?The claim is for partly not being informed of what was happening i gather?And now without even informing the players the union has raised this claim? someone tell me im wrongNope that's the way I read it aswell Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluepeter9 5,167 Posted December 11, 2012 Share Posted December 11, 2012 Aluko (and alledgedly Lafferty) both saying they know fk all about this?? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.