sergio 1,199 Posted January 9, 2013 Share Posted January 9, 2013 I was wondering if it would be possible to sue the SFA if they allow the 12 12 18 league to go ahead for the start of next season.My thinking is that Rangers bought and paid players to win promotion out of the lowest tier (which barring a disaster will happen) which is being denied us.Surely this must breech some Football rule, I cannot remember when any league re-construction was pushed through during a season to be ready for the following season.Thoughts ? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
j1mgg 3,766 Posted January 9, 2013 Share Posted January 9, 2013 I would of thought their would of been something to say changes have to be put in 2 years in advance or something like that, similar to if a club wants to resign they need to give 2 years notice.We shouldn't let this get us down and just carry on with what we are doing on the field and in the terraces. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Faircity 186 Posted January 9, 2013 Share Posted January 9, 2013 I would of thought their would of been something to say changes have to be put in 2 years in advance or something like that, similar to if a club wants to resign they need to give 2 years notice.We shouldn't let this get us down and just carry on with what we are doing on the field and in the terraces....Now that would make me laugh if it was the case they had to give two years notice before reconstruction....someone needs to look into this.. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
D'Artagnan 13,319 Posted January 9, 2013 Share Posted January 9, 2013 SergioThey will just say they were entitled to do so courtesy of that rule they have which basically allows them to make up rules as they go along (Im not joking - their articles of regulation actually say something to that effect) Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blumhoilann 6,715 Posted January 9, 2013 Share Posted January 9, 2013 ...and they'd probably come out with 'but you're not MEMBERS only ASSOCIATES Let them have their way,they'll all look foolish enough given time. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JCDBigBear 10,971 Posted January 10, 2013 Share Posted January 10, 2013 I would think that every single supporter who has bought a ticket for a supposed "meaningful" league game in SFL3 could feasibly sue the SFL and / or SFA for wrongful description of a product or service or something along those lines. If you misrepresent a product or change a service then I would think you should be liable to refund money. It will depend on legal interpretation. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MikeBlue 136 Posted January 10, 2013 Share Posted January 10, 2013 I would think that every single supporter who has bought a ticket for a supposed "meaningful" league game in SFL3 could feasibly sue the SFL and / or SFA for wrongful description of a product or service or something along those lines. If you misrepresent a product or change a service then I would think you should be liable to refund money. It will depend on legal interpretation.Class action by all ST holder's? Worth a thought. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
theblueoysterbar 20,182 Posted January 10, 2013 Share Posted January 10, 2013 UEFA and FIFA would go in a mother of a huff if we even tried that. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.