gogzy 31,195 Posted January 23, 2013 Share Posted January 23, 2013 One of the hosts just said on Clyde there, that there might be an alternative plan on the table "to appease Rangers".Would like to hear this plan lol.Wasn't hugh, it was the other one. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Edmiston Drive 3,846 Posted January 23, 2013 Share Posted January 23, 2013 One of the hosts just said on Clyde there, that there might be an alternative plan on the table "to appease Rangers".Would like to hear this plan lol.Wasn't hugh, it was the other one.What are they going to shoot Big Tam/Tommy as many alleged he prefers to be called instead of Peter ...............................That old Glasgow banter, shines through again Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MacNaCeardadh 94 Posted January 23, 2013 Share Posted January 23, 2013 It shouldn't be "to appease us", we're not the ones being unreasonable... it should be because the original idea was/is shocking and anyone with a brain wanted an alternative. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheOriginalHobo 34 Posted January 23, 2013 Share Posted January 23, 2013 Appease was probs chosen very specifically for that reason bud Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jack1690 793 Posted January 23, 2013 Share Posted January 23, 2013 You sure he didnt say "to disease Rangers"? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gogzy 31,195 Posted January 23, 2013 Author Share Posted January 23, 2013 Appease was probs chosen very specifically for that reason budyeah, i understand fully why he used that wording.To stir shit.There are multiple teams not happy about the current plan, it makes sense to have a back up plan. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
scarkev 3,540 Posted January 23, 2013 Share Posted January 23, 2013 Appease rangers? Are these morons at the wind up....it's not about appeasing us its about not treating us differently to how other clubs have been in the past and more importantly not making a league season almost irrelevant for the whole sfl3 and the fans who have attended games. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
boss 1,941 Posted January 23, 2013 Share Posted January 23, 2013 gogzy listening to SSB? He's a right scallywag. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gogzy 31,195 Posted January 23, 2013 Author Share Posted January 23, 2013 gogzy listening to SSB? He's a right scallywag. know thy enemy. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Senna 735 Posted January 23, 2013 Share Posted January 23, 2013 What are they going to shoot Big Tam/Tommy as many alleged he prefers to be called instead of Peter ...............................That old Glasgow banter, shines through again Nae offence ED, but your banter is pish these days. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Edmiston Drive 3,846 Posted January 23, 2013 Share Posted January 23, 2013 Nae offence ED, but your banter is pish these days. That's what a Forum is all about..........opinions .........even when so obviously wrong like the one you have just made Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BRITNEY IS NOT FEELING IT 8,293 Posted January 23, 2013 Share Posted January 23, 2013 Wouldny have opened this thread (apologies gogzy) if I never misread the title ,thought it was SSN Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Getstiffed 8,863 Posted January 23, 2013 Share Posted January 23, 2013 No Gogzy, this "plan B" has always been the plan, from the start as soon as they realized their own supporters had abandoned them.This was all an elaborate ruse to keep the blame for every single little thing squarely at our doorstep. Regardless of the fact it was they who led us down this path. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluechip 359 Posted January 23, 2013 Share Posted January 23, 2013 One of the hosts just said on Clyde there, that there might be an alternative plan on the table "to appease Rangers".Would like to hear this plan lol.Wasn't hugh, it was the other one.Did I hear them say two leagues of 21? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Senna 735 Posted January 23, 2013 Share Posted January 23, 2013 That's what a Forum is all about..........opinions .........even when so obviously wrong like the one you have just made Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gogzy 31,195 Posted January 23, 2013 Author Share Posted January 23, 2013 Di I hear them say two leagues of 21?that was a caller suggestion. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gogzy 31,195 Posted January 23, 2013 Author Share Posted January 23, 2013 Tannochside RSC @tannochside_rsc Charles Green says authorities are looking at 14 14 14 setup Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blueshoff 12,847 Posted January 23, 2013 Share Posted January 23, 2013 There is no appeasing. They will do what they want - after all Rangers are only associate members and have no vote.Probably (if true) an attempt to reintroduce the revenue generated by Rangers to the top level in Scotland and at the same time make Rangers look like the bad guys! Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
charleyfarley 14 Posted January 23, 2013 Share Posted January 23, 2013 Mentioned a extra 2 teams been introduced ? Flook knows how they were going tp split it though, more to the point did you hear that twat Delacunt again trying to ridicule CG saying that Talk sport were laughing at him in a interview a couple of weeks ago, far from it the only ones they were laughing at was the rest of Scottish football , yes I know we shouldn't listen but I hold out for old Speevins pegging it live on air Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buggleskelly 3,772 Posted January 23, 2013 Share Posted January 23, 2013 There's several clubs who don't want 12 12 18. Sounds like these plans are now being seen for what they are - ridiculous. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
nachothelegend 1,932 Posted January 23, 2013 Share Posted January 23, 2013 Its not the reconstruction they are interested in, its the immalgimation of the Leagues they want to Eat up The SFL for our TV rights. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
duns_90 12 Posted January 23, 2013 Share Posted January 23, 2013 The SPeLtic want ONE thing our TV money. They need to sell any restructure to their fans by keeping us oot the top league for another 3 years. It's unlikely we can leave Scotland any time soon so we should try to convince the SFL to stay as is and that a TV deal wi us is better. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smile 26,624 Posted January 23, 2013 Share Posted January 23, 2013 Not interested in being in a league run by bigots for bigots. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluesbro1976 162 Posted January 23, 2013 Share Posted January 23, 2013 aye and delacunt said they could havbe sold a hundred thousnd for juve game. seville calculator? plus they mhanks are selling to each other for over a grand. bheggars belief. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Douglas Cameron 179 Posted January 23, 2013 Share Posted January 23, 2013 If Charles Green makes it to Perth in a couple of weeks as reported then my number one question is understanding what is happening with the TV deals.The "5 year deal" is a tissue of lies. The amalgamation is transparently about securing our TV rights. Has anyone at the SFL actually spoken to the TV companies about a deal? Is that not potentially more beneficial to the SFL clubs than he SPL handouts being proposed? BT need content to fill their schedules next season. You just need to look at the viewing figures to see the value for money an SFL deal to show Rangers represents. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.