julescotia 11,407 Posted February 28, 2013 Share Posted February 28, 2013 Come on over ... we're having a party dougie76 and Redwhiteandblue 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ayrshireger 523 Posted February 28, 2013 Share Posted February 28, 2013 http://www.scotprem.com/content/mediaassets/doc/Commission%20Decision%2028%2002%202013.pdfDocument released. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
better than all the rest 153 Posted February 28, 2013 Share Posted February 28, 2013 SPL commission, chaired by Lord Nimmo Smith"Between the years 2000 and 2011 The Rangers Football Club Plc (now known as RFC2012 Plc (in liquidation) and referred to in the decision as "Oldco"), the owner andoperator of Rangers Football Club ("Rangers FC"), entered into side-letter arrangementswith a large number of its professional players under which Oldco undertook to makevery substantial payments to an offshore employee benefit remuneration trust, with theintent that such payments should be used to fund payments to be made to such playersin the form of loans(2) Those side-letter arrangements were required to be disclosed under the Rules of theScottish Premier League ("SPL") and the Scottish Football Association ("SFA") asforming part of the players' financial entitlement and as agreements providing forpayments to be received by the players;(3) Oldco through its senior management decided that such side-letter arrangements shouldnot be disclosed to the football authorities, and the Board of Directors sanctioned themaking of payments under the side-letter arrangements without taking any legal oraccountancy advice to justify the non-disclosure;(4) The relevant SPL Rules were designed to promote sporting integrity, by mitigating therisk of irregular payments to players;(5) Although the payments in this case were not themselves irregular and were not inbreach of SPL or SFA Rules, the scale and extent of the proven contraventions of thedisclosure rules require a substantial penalty to be imposed;(6) Rangers FC did not gain any unfair competitive advantage from the contraventions ofthe SPL Rules in failing to make proper disclosure of the side-letter arrangements, nordid the non-disclosure have the effect that any of the registered players were ineligibleto play, and for this and other reasons no sporting sanction or penalty should beimposed upon Rangers FC;(7) As noted in the Commission's earlier decision made on 12 September 2012 there is noallegation that the current owner and operator of the club, The Rangers Football ClubLimited ("Newco"), contravened the SPL Rules or could be held responsible for anybreach by Oldco;In all the circumstances the Commission has imposed a fine of £250,000 on Oldco." Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dutchy 1,200 Posted February 28, 2013 Share Posted February 28, 2013 Just turned the radio on and I thought I was on Radio Scotland(Ireland) with the sound of the voices, but it was 5Live and our friend(cunt), Chris McGobbleland was saying that we were not going to lose titles.Yiphee I thought then I thought, all this shit is the usual 'political' trick of heavy threats, just in order to get their own way by appearing to be nice to us.This has taken months and we've been ridiculed constantly by the real 'hate' fans in this country.Doncaaster has to go now, followed shortly by Regan.What a way to run a countries football??? dougie76 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BRITNEY IS NOT FEELING IT 8,293 Posted February 28, 2013 Share Posted February 28, 2013 1201: SPL commission, chaired by Lord Nimmo Smith"Between the years 2000 and 2011 The Rangers Football Club Plc (now known as RFC2012 Plc (in liquidation) and referred to in the decision as "Oldco"), the owner andoperator of Rangers Football Club ("Rangers FC"), entered into side-letter arrangementswith a large number of its professional players under which Oldco undertook to makevery substantial payments to an offshore employee benefit remuneration trust, with theintent that such payments should be used to fund payments to be made to such playersin the form of loans(2) Those side-letter arrangements were required to be disclosed under the Rules of theScottish Premier League ("SPL") and the Scottish Football Association ("SFA") asforming part of the players' financial entitlement and as agreements providing forpayments to be received by the players;(3) Oldco through its senior management decided that such side-letter arrangements shouldnot be disclosed to the football authorities, and the Board of Directors sanctioned themaking of payments under the side-letter arrangements without taking any legal oraccountancy advice to justify the non-disclosure;(4) The relevant SPL Rules were designed to promote sporting integrity, by mitigating therisk of irregular payments to players;(5) Although the payments in this case were not themselves irregular and were not inbreach of SPL or SFA Rules, the scale and extent of the proven contraventions of thedisclosure rules require a substantial penalty to be imposed;(6) Rangers FC did not gain any unfair competitive advantage from the contraventions ofthe SPL Rules in failing to make proper disclosure of the side-letter arrangements, nordid the non-disclosure have the effect that any of the registered players were ineligibleto play, and for this and other reasons no sporting sanction or penalty should beimposed upon Rangers FC;(7) As noted in the Commission's earlier decision made on 12 September 2012 there is noallegation that the current owner and operator of the club, The Rangers Football ClubLimited ("Newco"), contravened the SPL Rules or could be held responsible for anybreach by Oldco;In all the circumstances the Commission has imposed a fine of £250,000 on Oldco." Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RFC55 108,841 Posted February 28, 2013 Share Posted February 28, 2013 (5) Although the payments in this case were not themselves irregular and were not inbreach of SPL or SFA Rules, the scale and extent of the proven contraventions of thedisclosure rules require a substantial penalty to be imposed;(6) Rangers FC did not gain any unfair competitive advantage from the contraventions ofthe SPL Rules in failing to make proper disclosure of the side-letter arrangements, nordid the non-disclosure have the effect that any of the registered players were ineligibleto play, and for this and other reasons no sporting sanction or penalty should beimposed upon Rangers FC;Says it all really Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
keithgersbear 3,225 Posted February 28, 2013 Share Posted February 28, 2013 They will not catch it by the time we get back. Haha. Get it up them. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gogzy 31,195 Posted February 28, 2013 Share Posted February 28, 2013 (6) Rangers FC did not gain any unfair competitive advantage from the contraventions ofthe SPL Rules in failing to make proper disclosure of the side-letter arrangements, nordid the non-disclosure have the effect that any of the registered players were ineligibleto play, and for this and other reasons no sporting sanction or penalty should beimposed upon Rangers FC;There it is in a nutshell. Very happy with this. Bears r us and Fools Gold 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Godfather 71,874 Posted February 28, 2013 Share Posted February 28, 2013 Anyone else post the ruiling for me cheers? StornowayBlue 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Edmiston Drive 3,846 Posted February 28, 2013 Share Posted February 28, 2013 They will try and steal the headlines, to keep our news off the front pages............ Like dope resigns or senior cardinal resigns following allegations against him in the papers,Far fetched I know. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnw 22 Posted February 28, 2013 Share Posted February 28, 2013 . Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
nelsonRFC82 305 Posted February 28, 2013 Share Posted February 28, 2013 THE SCOTTISH PREMIER LEAGUE LIMITEDDECISIONbyTHE RT HON LORD NIMMO SMITH,NICHOLAS STEWART QCandCHARLES FLINT QCthe Commission appointed by Resolution of the Board of Directors of The Scottish PremierLeague Limited dated 1 August 2012 in relation to RFC 2012 Plc (now in liquidation) andRangers Football Club__________________Summary[1] For the reasons which are set out in detail below the Commission has unanimouslydecided:(1) Between the years 2000 and 2011 The Rangers Football Club Plc (now known as RFC2012 Plc (in liquidation) and referred to in the decision as “Oldco”), the owner andoperator of Rangers Football Club (“Rangers FC”), entered into side-letter arrangementswith a large number of its professional players under which Oldco undertook to makevery substantial payments to an offshore employee benefit remuneration trust, with theintent that such payments should be used to fund payments to be made to such playersin the form of loans;(2) Those side-letter arrangements were required to be disclosed under the Rules of theScottish Premier League (“SPL”) and the Scottish Football Association (“SFA”) asforming part of the players’ financial entitlement and as agreements providing forpayments to be received by the players;2(3) Oldco through its senior management decided that such side-letter arrangements shouldnot be disclosed to the football authorities, and the Board of Directors sanctioned themaking of payments under the side-letter arrangements without taking any legal oraccountancy advice to justify the non-disclosure;(4) The relevant SPL Rules were designed to promote sporting integrity, by mitigating therisk of irregular payments to players;(5) Although the payments in this case were not themselves irregular and were not inbreach of SPL or SFA Rules, the scale and extent of the proven contraventions of thedisclosure rules require a substantial penalty to be imposed;(6) Rangers FC did not gain any unfair competitive advantage from the contraventions ofthe SPL Rules in failing to make proper disclosure of the side-letter arrangements, nordid the non-disclosure have the effect that any of the registered players were ineligibleto play, and for this and other reasons no sporting sanction or penalty should beimposed upon Rangers FC;(7) As noted in the Commission’s earlier decision made on 12 September 2012 there is noallegation that the current owner and operator of the club, The Rangers Football ClubLimited (“Newco”), contravened the SPL Rules or could be held responsible for anybreach by Oldco;(8) In all the circumstances the Commission has imposed a fine of £250,000 on Oldco.Players were eligible, and no advantage gained!Hugely significant! The bit about eligibility actually contradicts what the media have been saying this past hour.Bheasts go and take a fuck to yourself! Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hairy Rz 35 Posted February 28, 2013 Share Posted February 28, 2013 250,000 fine. BBC news just skimmed over it Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack The Flipper 5,936 Posted February 28, 2013 Share Posted February 28, 2013 Just had a little cry, and don't want to say anything other than - payback time rangers. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Godfather 71,874 Posted February 28, 2013 Share Posted February 28, 2013 This is breaking news Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ronniemca 479 Posted February 28, 2013 Share Posted February 28, 2013 Who's the mason in the wig?Well done brother LNS ,drinks and hokey kokey at the lodge tonight. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Right_To_Censor 1,951 Posted February 28, 2013 Share Posted February 28, 2013 i'll bring this backthe seal delivers the news to lennon Craigie79, RetroCase, Zaitsev and 1 other 4 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RFC55 108,841 Posted February 28, 2013 Share Posted February 28, 2013 Yaaaaaas. Thank fuck, I thought someone would have made a thread by now telling us. Cheers mate RockwellGers and Hairy Rz 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Godfather 71,874 Posted February 28, 2013 Share Posted February 28, 2013 If someone could post this in General Sports for Deek then that would be great, he will need this info to keep up the charade... BRITNEY IS NOT FEELING IT 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bears r us 30,793 Posted February 28, 2013 Share Posted February 28, 2013 and to all fellow Bears/Bearettes Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheBluebells 6,898 Posted February 28, 2013 Share Posted February 28, 2013 Fucking yes!! Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dunny_01 2,007 Posted February 28, 2013 Share Posted February 28, 2013 Thank God for That !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Can we get on with rebuilding our club now............ but should the Illegall Transfer ban now be dropped........ ??? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
better than all the rest 153 Posted February 28, 2013 Share Posted February 28, 2013 i just don't get it,so we didn't do anything wrong. (6) Rangers FC did not gain any unfair competitive advantage from the contraventions of the SPL Rules in failing to make proper disclosure of the side-letter arrangements, nor did the non-disclosure have the effect that any of the registered players were ineligible to play, and for this and other reasons no sporting sanction or penalty should be imposed upon Rangers FC;(7) As noted in the Commission's earlier decision made on 12 September 2012 there is no allegation that the current owner and operator of the club, The Rangers Football Club Limited ("Newco"), contravened the SPL Rules or could be held responsible for any breach by Oldco;In all the circumstances the Commission has imposed a fine of £250,000 on Oldco." Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Edmiston Drive 3,846 Posted February 28, 2013 Share Posted February 28, 2013 I'm pretty certain that the SPL held back payment from last season for RFC finishing second.Indeed they did, also made a statement they the new Ltd Co could not claim this prize money, so BDO should really be knocking on their door for said money. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gogzy 31,195 Posted February 28, 2013 Share Posted February 28, 2013 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.